Updates the message to use the type or ValueDecl instead of this on previous 'Found this candidate' messages
Note: doees not yet change all test cases so more tests are failing
Improve Diagnostic message on overload ambiguitiy
Remove messages that say 'found this candidate' in favour of providing the type for the candidate to aid in selection when the candidates are presented in a dialogue window.
Fix more tests
For example @objc lookup could find multiple instance members
on `AnyObject`. It should be allowed to diagnose issues with
that as non-ambiguous if all fixes have the same kind/base type.
Resolves: rdar://102412006
This is a case where a constructor overload choice
might currently have an optional opened type, so
make sure we can handle it. Arguably we shouldn't
even be introducing constructors into the overload
set here though, as it's invalid anyway.
In Swift < 6 warn about plain type name passed as an
argument to a subscript, dynamic subscript, or ObjC
literal since it used to be accepted.
Resolves: rdar://80270126
* [Sema] Implementing is runtime check always true diagnostic as a fix
* [AST] Implement getWithoutThrows on function type
* [CSSimplify] Detect that checked cast types conversion is always true and record warning fix
* [test] Some additional test cases for SR-13789
* [Sema] Fixing typo on fix name
* [Sema] Move and adjust the ConditionalCast diagnostics to the fix format
* [Sema] Remove some checked cast diagnostics from check constraints and move to fix
* [Sema] Renaming checked cast coercible types fix
* [Sema] Some adjustments and rewrite on the logic for downcast record fix
* [Sema] Move logic of runtime function type to AllowUnsupportedRuntimeCheckedCast::attempt
* [Sema] Abstract checked cast fix logic to static function and minor adjustments
* [Sema] Renamings from review
Previously we would always consider an AnyObject
subscript lookup to be ambiguous if there was a
candidate in both a class and protocol, even if
the selectors and types matched. This was due to
the protocol's generic signature preventing the
signatures from being coalesced.
Tweak the logic to strip generic signatures when
comparing for AnyObject lookup, matching what we
do for @objc methods.
Resolves SR-8611.
Resolves rdar://43645564 & rdar://62906344.
Register DynamicSubscriptExpr's index expression
as a call argument in MiscDiagnostics to avoid it
being diagnosed as a single element labelled tuple.
Resolves SR-12799.
Rather than attempting to pull out a concrete decl
ref from the rewritten function expr, retrieve the
callee from the solution using a callee locator
computed before the apply is rewritten, and then
pass this callee down through `finishApply` and
`coerceCallArguments`.
Resolves SR-11648.
Detect and fix situations when (force) unwrap is used on
a non-optional type, this helps to diagnose invalid unwraps
precisely and provide fix-its.
Resolves: [SR-8977](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-8977)
Resolves: rdar://problem/45218255
This rule caused us to lose ambiguities in places where we really want ambiguity for `AnyObject` lookup, so only apply it when not comparing such overloads. This whole situation is a bit of a hack – really we shouldn't be applying any type-based or context-based overload ranking rules to overloads found through `AnyObject` lookup, but unfortunately we don't have syntax to precisely disambiguate overloads.
This commit can be reverted if/when we ever remove `AnyObject` lookup.
This builds on initial commit which added `RelabelArguments` fix
to the solver that only supported `missingLabels` at that moment,
but now it supports all three posibilities - missing/extraneous and
incorrect labels.
When we perform AnyObject lookup, we can find multiple declarations with
the same signature. When we do so, we pick fairly arbitrarily among them.
However, make sure that we don’t pick an unavailable declaration when
an available declaration is… available.
Fixes rdar://problem/39115471.
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
We weren't previously testing every combination of dynamic with and
without IUO, so I've added tests to attempt to improve the situation.
We currently produce rvalues for dynamic lookups, which is incorrect,
and can be seen in some of the test output.
When in Swift 3 compatibility mode without
`-warn-swift3-objc-inference`, warn on the *uses* of declarations that
depend on the Objective-C runtime that became `@objc` due to the
deprecated inference rule. This far more directly captures important
uses of the deprecated Objective-C entrypoints. We diagnose:
* `#selector` expressions that refer to one of these `@objc` members
* `#keyPath` expressions that refer to one of these `@objc` members
* Dynamic lookup (i.e., member access via `AnyObject`) that refers to
one of these `@objc` members.
We can end up with IUOs bound as a result of overload resolution. When
this happens and the resulting type is used as a generic, we can end up
with dependent member types that fail to simplify properly as a result
of failing to substitute due to the IUO getting in the way. In these
cases it should be completely safe to strip the IUO off and retry
substitution with the base type.
This isn't really an ideal fix by any means, and we need to revisit how
we handle bindings to make it more uniform, but for now I think this is
a reasonable path to move forward.
Fixes a source compatibility regression.
rdar://problem/29960575
and provide a fix-it to move it to the new location as referenced
in SE-0081.
Fix up a few stray places in the standard library that is still using
the old syntax.
Update any ./test files that aren't expecting the new warning/fix-it
in -verify mode.
While investigating what I thought was a new crash due to this new
diagnostic, I discovered two sources of quite a few compiler crashers
related to unterminated generic parameter lists, where the right
angle bracket source location was getting unconditionally set to
the current token, even though it wasn't actually a '>'.
This commit defines the ‘Any’ keyword, implements parsing for composing
types with an infix ‘&’, and provides a fixit to convert ‘protocol<>’
- Updated tests & stdlib for new composition syntax
- Provide errors when compositions used in inheritance.
Any is treated as a contextual keyword. The name ‘Any’
is used emit the empty composition type. We have to
stop user declaring top level types spelled ‘Any’ too.
along with recent policy changes:
- For expression types that are not specifically handled, make sure to
produce a general "unused value" warning, catching a bunch of unused
values in the testsuite.
- For unused operator results, diagnose them as uses of the operator
instead of "calls".
- For calls, mutter the type of the result for greater specificity.
- For initializers, mutter the type of the initialized value.
- Look through OpenExistentialExpr's so we can handle protocol member
references propertly.
- Look through several other expressions so we handle @discardableResult
better.
