Use the `%target-swift-5.1-abi-triple` substitution to compile the tests for
deployment to the minimum OS versions required for use of _Concurrency APIs,
instead of disabling availability checking.
This warnings don't give much benefits for developers. Code completion
UI tends to show them unusable. But usually, developers can modify the
context to accept async calls, e.g. by wrapping it with `Task { }`
rdar://126737530
I had to change the APIs to always be always emit into client instead of back
deployable since silgen_name seems to interfere with @backDeployment. So I
switched the implementation so that it instead uses an always emit into client
thunk with the in source function name and a usableFromInline function that has
the silgen_name. This ensures that we still appropriately export the same symbol
as we did before, so it is ABI stable.
This was approved as part of se-0414.
rdar://122030520
Store whether a result is async in the `ContextFreeCodeCompletionResult` and determine whether an async method is used in a sync context when promoting the context free result to a contextual result.
rdar://78317170
I think that preferring identical over convertible makes sense in e.g. C++ where we have implicit user-defined type conversions but since we don’t have them in Swift, I think the distinction doesn’t make too much sense, because if we have a `func foo(x: Int?)`, want don’t really want to prioritize variables of type `Int?` over `Int` Similarly if we have `func foo(x: View)`, we don’t want to prioritize a variable of type `View` over e.g. `Text`.
rdar://91349364
Computing the type relation for every item in the code completion cache is way to expensive (~4x slowdown for global completion that imports `SwiftUI`). Instead, compute a type’s supertypes (protocol conformances and superclasses) once and write their USRs to the cache. To compute a type relation we can then check if the contextual type is in the completion item’s supertypes.
This reduces the overhead of computing the type relations (again global completion that imports `SwiftUI`) to ~6% – measured by instructions executed.
Technically, we might miss some conversions like
- retroactive conformances inside another module (because we can’t cache them if that other module isn’t imported)
- complex generic conversions (just too complicated to model using USRs)
Because of this, we never report an `unrelated` type relation for global items but always default to `unknown`.
But I believe this change covers the most common cases and is a good tradeoff between accuracy and performance.
rdar://83846531
Computing the type relation for every item in the code completion cache is way to expensive (~4x slowdown for global completion that imports `SwiftUI`). Instead, compute a type’s supertypes (protocol conformances and superclasses) once and write their USRs to the cache. To compute a type relation we can then check if the contextual type is in the completion item’s supertypes.
This reduces the overhead of computing the type relations (again global completion that imports `SwiftUI`) to ~6% – measured by instructions executed.
Technically, we might miss some conversions like
- retroactive conformances inside another module (because we can’t cache them if that other module isn’t imported)
- complex generic conversions (just too complicated to model using USRs)
Because of this, we never report an `unrelated` type relation for global items but always default to `unknown`.
But I believe this change covers the most common cases and is a good tradeoff between accuracy and performance.
rdar://83846531
'InvalidAsyncContext' depends on the decl context. That may case
"sticky" not-recommended If it's cached for a non-async context.
To workaround this, stop checking 'InvalidAsyncContext' when collecting
completion items for caching. Also consistently use the 'SourceFile' as
the decl context to avoid decl context specific behavior.
rdar://78315441
