I think that preferring identical over convertible makes sense in e.g. C++ where we have implicit user-defined type conversions but since we don’t have them in Swift, I think the distinction doesn’t make too much sense, because if we have a `func foo(x: Int?)`, want don’t really want to prioritize variables of type `Int?` over `Int` Similarly if we have `func foo(x: View)`, we don’t want to prioritize a variable of type `View` over e.g. `Text`.
rdar://91349364
`CodeCompletioString::getName()` was used only as the sorting keys in
`CodeCompletionContext::sortCompletionResults()` which is effectively
deprecated. There's no reason to check them in `swift-ide-test`. Instead,
check `printCodeCompletionResultFilterName()` that is actually used for
filtering.
To describe fine grained priorities.
Introduce 'CodeCompletionFlair' that is a set of more descriptive flags for
prioritizing completion items. This aims to replace '
SemanticContextKind::ExpressionSpecific' which was a "catch all"
prioritization flag.
Calculate and set the type relation in each result building logic which
knows the actual result type.
CodeCompletionResultBuilder couldn't know the actual result type. From
the declaration alone, it cannot know the correct result type because it
doesn't know how the declaration is used (e.g. calling? referencing by
compound name? curried?)
Implement basic code completion support for #selector with property
getters/setters. The vast majority of this implementation comes from
Alex Hoppen (@ahoppen), with only a handful of my own tweaks. Alex has
more interesting ideas on improving this that I wasn't quite ready to
commit to, so this is more basic than the overall goal.
When we're code completing a postfix or dot expression inside the
subexpression of an #selector expression, prefer compound function
names. This helps us write, e.g.,
#selector(UIView.
and get completions such as "insertSubview(_:aboveSubview:)". Fixes
rdar://problem/24470075.
