We don't have any language or runtime support for noncopyable types as generic
or dynamic types yet, and existing reflection code almost certainly assumes it
can copy the values it's working with, and will trap or corrupt state if it does
so with noncopyable types. But a class can have noncopyable fields while the
type itself is copyable, and existing code assumes that it can use `Mirror` or
other reflection mechanisms to safely traverse the contents of an arbitrary
class.
Allow this sort of code to continue working, while still preparing for forward
compatibility with future runtimes that do support noncopyable generics, by
emitting the type references for fields using a function that probes the
address of a new symbol in the Swift runtime. The symbol will either be missing
or defined with an absolute address of zero in current or previous runtime
versions, but can be changed to a non-null address in the future.
