Also mark them as not executable, since they don't call `%target-run`.
This is needed in back deployment configurations where StringProcessing is
not supported.
Addresses rdar://159635486
Since we can't do a proper "deep" clone of expression nodes, cloning
such a CustomAttr is necessarily shallow. In such cases, don't cache
the swift_attr source files at all, so we get fresh attribute nodes
for each such usage.
Introduce a number of fixes to allow us to fully use declarations that
are produced by applying a peer macro to an imported declarations.
These changes include:
* Ensuring that we have the right set of imports in the source file
containing the macro expansion, because it depends only on the module
it comes from
* Ensuring that name lookup looks in that file even when the
DeclContext hierarchy doesn't contain the source file (because it's
based on the Clang module structure)
Expand testing to be sure that we're getting the right calls,
diagnostics, and generated IR symbols.
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
These currently end up as "open", which is incorrect (we need to make them
"final"). This cannot be addressed until we pass the lexical context
down to the macro, which is currently... a bit tricky.
The Clang importer maps arbitrary attributes spelled with `swift_attr("...")`
over to Swift attributes, using the Swift parser to process those attributes.
Extend this mechanism to allow `swift_attr` to refer to an attached macro,
expanding that macro as needed.
When a macro is applied to an imported declaration, that declaration is
pretty-printed (from the C++ AST) to provide to the macro implementation.
There are a few games we need to place to resolve the macro, and a few more
to lazily perform pretty-printing and adjust source locations to get the
right information to the macro, but this demonstrates that we could
take this path.
As an example, we use this mechanism to add an `async` version of a C
function that delivers its result via completion handler, using the
`@AddAsync` example macro implementation from the swift-syntax
repository.
