- Don't attempt to insert fixes if there are restrictions present, they'd inform the failures.
Inserting fixes too early doesn't help the solver because restriction matching logic would
record the same fixes.
- Adjust impact of the fixes.
Optional conversions shouldn't impact the score in any way because
they are not the source of the issue.
- Look through one level of optional when failure is related to optional injection.
The diagnostic is going to be about underlying type, so there is no reason to print
optional on right-hand side.
Let's consider conditional requirement failure to mean that parent
conformance requirement wasn't satisfied and nothing more, that helps
to disambiguate certain situations and avoid filtering out conditional
failures.
Resolves: rdar://problem/64844584
If there is a conditional requirement failure associated with
member/function reference used in a call let's increase a score
of a fix for such failure because it renders member/function
unreachable in current context or with a given set of arguments.
This makes it possible to diagnose all implicit pointer
conversions in argument positions with a better error
message which preserves enclosing types, and allows to
share base type matching logic across all pointer conversions.
Since this kind of failure is really a conversion failure, let's
inherit from `Contextual{Mismatch, Failure}` which also helps with
storage for from/to types and their resolution.
Also let's use original types involved in conversion to form
this fix, which helps to perserve all of the original sugar.
Example:
```swift
func foo(_ x: UnsafePointer<Int>) {}
var arr: [Float] = [0, 1, 2]
foo(&arr) // Cannot convert [Float] to UnsafePointer<Int> because of Float vs. Int
```
Detect and diagnose a contextual mismatch between expected
collection element type and the one provided (e.g. source
of the assignment or argument to a call) e.g.:
```swift
let _: [Int] = ["hello"]
func foo(_: [Int]) {}
foo(["hello"])
```
This makes diagnostics more verbose and accurate, because
it's possible to distinguish how many parameters there are
based on the message itself.
Also there are multiple diagnostic messages in a format of
`<descriptive-kind> <decl-name> ...` that get printed as
e.g. `subscript 'subscript'` if empty labels are omitted.
When we determine that an optional value needs to be unwrapped to make
an expression type check, use notes to provide several different
Fix-It options (with descriptions) rather than always pushing users
toward '!'. Specifically, the errors + Fix-Its now looks like this:
error: value of optional type 'X?' must be unwrapped to a value of
type 'X'
f(x)
^
note: coalesce using '??' to provide a default when the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
?? <#default value#>
note: force-unwrap using '!' to abort execution if the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
!
Fixes rdar://problem/42081852.
And provide better semantic background by surrounding 'nil' in ticks when it is referred to as a value
Added missing tests for certain cases involving nil capitalization
The amp_prefix token is currently tolerated in any unary expression
context and then diagnosed later by Sema. This patch changes parsing to
only accept tok::amp_prefix in its allowed position: parameter lists.
This also fixes two "compiler crasher" tests.
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
Also remove mention of the word “contextual” type from the diagnostic
that rewrites array literals into dictionary literals and scale back
the scope of the diagnostic. This method was catching and
mis-diagnosing too many errors that could better be handled by invalid
conversion diagnostics.
* Refactor Indices and Slice to use conditional conformance
* Replace ReversedRandomAccessCollection with a conditional extension
* Refactor some types into struct+extensions
* Revise Slice documentation
* Fix test cases for adoption of conditional conformances.
* [RangeReplaceableCollection] Eliminate unnecessary slicing subscript operator.
* Add -enable-experimental-conditional-conformances to test.
* Gruesome workaround for crasher in MutableSlice tests
Consider different overload choices for the same location in evaluation
order, this makes overload resolution more predictable because it's going
to follow expression bottom-up, that prevents situations when some
expressions are considered ambigious because choices taken further up
equate the score, instead each level is given distinct weight
based on evaluation order.
Resolves: rdar://problem/31888810
This includes functions without type parameters that are generic
because they are members of a generic context. This addresses a
diagnostics regression because the '==' operators for Optional, Array,
and Dictionary were made into members.
The resulting error message is a little ugly, but is more informative
(and much shorter) than what we had before.
Currently `visitAssignExpr` always attempts to use type
derived from destination as a contextual type for assignment
source type-checking, which doesn't always lead to better
results.
Resolves: SR-5081
Previously we had more ad hoc logic that tried to decide if it was
worth desugaring a type based on its structure. Now we instead look
for a typealias that might actually benefit from desugaring, and if
we don't find one we won't show the 'aka' note.
Allows converting a raw slice into a zero-based raw buffer,
which is a common operation on flat memory.
Add and update UnsafeRawBufferPointer unit tests.
* Add sliceability tests for Unsafe(Raw)BufferPointer.
Improve the generic sliceability tests to verify that SubSequence indices are
compatible with their parents indices.
* Fix and enable testing stdlib Collection instances.
Top-level entry points fully testing a collection instance:
check${Traversal}Collection
One level of recursion into all slices of the collection instance
O(n^2). (Not combinatorial).
Previously, checkCollection() did nothing. So much of the testing infrastructure was inactive. Now it runs all forward collection tests.
Fixes a bug in subscriptRangeTests.
The UnsafeRawBufferPointer and Data collection testing is disabled and
will be fixed in the following commit.
* Give UnsafeRawBufferPointer a distinct slice type.
SubSequence = RandomAccessSlice<Self>
* Fix raw buffer pointer tests after changing the API
* Add UnsafeRawBuffer(rebasing:) initializers.
Allows converting a raw slice into a zero-based raw buffer,
which is a common operation on flat memory.
Add and update UnsafeRawBufferPointer unit tests.
* Do not run recursive O(n^2) collection slice testing on large collections.
Now, even with collection unit testing wired up, the validation tests
take the same amount of time to execute.
* Add init(rebasing:) to UnsafeBufferPointer.
This is required for consistency with UnsafeRawBufferPointer.
* Update CHANGELOG.md for SE-0138 amendment: UnsafeRawBufferPointer slice type.
Update for SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer
This adds a "mutating" initialize to UnsafePointer to make
Immutable -> Mutable conversions explicit.
These are quick fixes to stdlib, overlays, and test cases that are necessary
in order to remove arbitrary UnsafePointer conversions.
Many cases can be expressed better up by reworking the surrounding
code, but we first need a working starting point.
* Migrate from `UnsafePointer<Void>` to `UnsafeRawPointer`.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
`void*` imports as `UnsafeMutableRawPointer`.
`const void*` imports as `UnsafeRawPointer`.
Occurrences of `UnsafePointer<Void>` are replaced with UnsafeRawPointer.
* Migrate overlays from UnsafePointer<Void> to UnsafeRawPointer.
This requires explicit memory binding in several places,
particularly in NSData and CoreAudio.
* Fix a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* qsort takes IUO values
* Bridge `Unsafe[Mutable]RawPointer as `void [const] *`.
* Parse #dsohandle as UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Update a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* Trivial fix for the SceneKit test case.
* Add an UnsafeRawPointer self initializer.
This is unfortunately necessary for assignment between types imported from C.
* Tiny simplification of the initializer.
* Migrate from `UnsafePointer<Void>` to `UnsafeRawPointer`.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
`void*` imports as `UnsafeMutableRawPointer`.
`const void*` imports as `UnsafeRawPointer`.
Occurrences of `UnsafePointer<Void>` are replaced with UnsafeRawPointer.
* Migrate overlays from UnsafePointer<Void> to UnsafeRawPointer.
This requires explicit memory binding in several places,
particularly in NSData and CoreAudio.
* Fix a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* qsort takes IUO values
* Bridge `Unsafe[Mutable]RawPointer as `void [const] *`.
* Parse #dsohandle as UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Update a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* Trivial fix for the SceneKit test case.
* Add an UnsafeRawPointer self initializer.
This is unfortunately necessary for assignment between types imported from C.
* Tiny simplification of the initializer.
* [Type System] Handle raw pointer conversion.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0107-unsaferawpointer.md#implicit-argument-conversion
UnsafeMutablePointer<T> -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
UnsafeMutablePointer<T> -> UnsafeRawPointer
UnsafePointer<T> -> UnsafeRawPointer
UnsafeMutableRawPointer -> UnsafeRawPointer
inout:
&anyVar -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
&anyVar -> UnsafeRawPointer
array -> UnsafeRawPointer
string -> UnsafeRawPointer
varArray -> UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Rename expectEqual(_, _, sameValue:) to expectEqualTest to workaround a type system bug.
<rdar://26058520> Generic type constraints incorrectly applied to functions with the same name
This is exposed by additions to the type system for UnsafeRawPointer.
Warning: unit tests fail very confusingly without this fix.
