This is a diagnostic that is only really emitted as a fallback when
the constraint system isn't able to better diagnose the expression.
It's not particulary helpful for the user, and can be often be
misleading since the underlying issue might not actually be an
ambiguity, and the user may well already have a type annotation. Let's
instead just emit the fallback diagnostic that we emit in all other
cases, asking the user to file a bug.
Now look through other opaque return types that appear in the
underlying type. This catches various forms of recursion that
otherwise would cause a SILGen or SILOptimizer crash.
- Fixes rdar://82992151.
If a type gets `Sendable` conformace requirement through another
`@preconcurrency` protocol the error should be downgraded even
with strict concurrency checking to allow clients time to address
the new requirement.
Resolves: rdar://146027395
The proposal states that this should work, but this was never
implemented:
protocol P<A> {
associatedtype A
}
struct S: P<Int> {}
- Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/62906.
- Fixes rdar://91842338.
This matches send non sendable but importantly also makes it clear that we are
talking about something that doesn't conform to the Sendable protocol which is
capitalized.
rdar://151802975
Print diagnostic groups as part of the LLVM printer in the same manner as the
Swift one does, always. Make `-print-diagnostic-groups` an inert option, since we
always print diagnostic group names with the `[#GroupName]` syntax.
As part of this, we no longer render the diagnostic group name as part
of the diagnostic *text*, instead leaving it up to the diagnostic
renderer to handle the category appropriately. Update all of the tests
that were depending on `-print-diagnostic-groups` putting it into the
text to instead use the `{{documentation-file=<file name>}}`
diagnostic verification syntax.
We've been converging the implementations of educational notes and
diagnostic groups, where both provide category information in
diagnostics (e.g., `[#StrictMemorySafety]`) and corresponding
short-form documentation files. The diagnostic group model is more
useful in a few ways:
* It provides warnings-as-errors control for warnings in the group
* It is easier to associate a diagnostic with a group with
GROUPED_ERROR/GROUPED_WARNING than it is to have a separate diagnostic
ID -> mapping.
* It is easier to see our progress on diagnostic-group coverage
* It provides an easy name to use for diagnostic purposes.
Collapse the educational-notes infrastructure into diagnostic groups,
migrating all of the existing educational notes into new groups.
Simplify the code paths that dealt with multiple educational notes to
have a single, possibly-missing "category documentation URL", which is
how we're treating this.
* [CS] Decline to handle InlineArray in shrink
Previously we would try the contextual type `(<int>, <element>)`,
which is wrong. Given we want to eliminate shrink, let's just bail.
* [Sema] Sink `ValueMatchVisitor` into `applyUnboundGenericArguments`
Make sure it's called for sugar code paths too. Also let's just always
run it since it should be a pretty cheap check.
* [Sema] Diagnose passing integer to non-integer type parameter
This was previously missed, though would have been diagnosed later
as a requirement failure.
* [Parse] Split up `canParseType`
While here, address the FIXME in `canParseTypeSimpleOrComposition`
and only check to see if we can parse a type-simple, including
`each`, `some`, and `any` for better recovery.
* Introduce type sugar for InlineArray
Parse e.g `[3 x Int]` as type sugar for InlineArray. Gated behind
an experimental feature flag for now.
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/72659 turned out to have some
source compatibility fallout that we need to fix. Instead of introducing
yet another brittle compatibility hack, stop emitting errors about a
missing `any` altogether until a future language mode.
Besides resolving the compatibility issue, this will encourage
developers to adopt any sooner and grant us ample time to gracefully
address any remaining bugs before the source compatibility burden
resurfaces.
A subsequent commit adds a diagnostic group that will allow users to
escalate these warnings to errors with `-Werror ExistentialAny`.
This workaround is no longer needed because `TypeAliasType` is now
modeled using generic arguments (as opposed to a substitution map).
Previously, computing the substitution map in `StructuralTypeRequest` to
construct the resulting `TypeAliasType` could cause a request cycle
around generic signature computation.
Instead of making an undo() do an infer(), let's record fine-grained
changes about what was retracted, and directly re-insert the same
elements into the data structures.
Also stop suggesting a '?' fix-it for casts, where it is not likely to
be helpful because the common intention is either to force the optional
or declare an IUO.
Recent refactoring fixed a bug that previously caused `f()` to be checked as if
it were unavailable only on macOS in the following example:
```
@available(macOS, unavailable)
struct Outer {
@available(*, unavailable)
func f() {
someFunctionUnavailableOnMacOS()
}
}
```
Unfortunately, fixing that bug made a different existing availability checking
rule more problematic. References to declarations that are unavailable on the
current platform have been diagnosed as unavailable even in contexts that are
universally unavailable. This long standing behavior is overly strict but it
rarely had consequences. However, now that the example above is modeled
correctly, this overly strict behavior is causing some source compatibility
issues. The easiest solution is to relax the overly strict checking.
Resolves rdar://141124478.
Just because the type of the initializer expression is an opaque return type,
does not mean it is the opaque return type *for the variable being initialized*.
It looks like there is a bit of duplicated logic and layering violations going
on so I only fixed one caller of openOpaqueType(). This addresses the test case
in the issue. For the remaining calls I added FIXMEs to investigate what is
going on.
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/73245.
Fixes rdar://127180656.
Previously we would check if we have a SwitchStmt,
and apply diagnostics such as `checkExistentialTypes`
to the CaseStmts individually. This however would
have been missed for `catch` statements. The change
to consistently call `performStmtDiagnostics` in
closures fixed this for `do-catch`'s in closures,
this commit fixes it for those outside of closures.
Because this is source breaking, the existential
diagnostic is downgraded to a warning until Swift
7 for catch statements specifically.
While here, also apply the ambiguous where clause
diagnostic to `catch` statements.
A function declaration cannot have an opaque parameter type appearing in
consuming position:
func f(_: (some P) -> ()) {}
However, we should skip this check for a closure, because if the
closure's parameter list references an opaque parameter declaration,
it means something else: namely, the inferred type of the closure
refers to an opaque parameter from an outer scope. That's allowed.
This unnecessary prohibition has been there ever since the check was
added, but only for multi-statement closures, so nobody seemed to
notice.
When https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/76473 made it so we always
call TypeChecker::checkParameterList(), this exposed the problem in a
single-expression closure in an existing project.
Fixes rdar://139237671.
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Today ParenType is used:
1. As the type of ParenExpr
2. As the payload type of an unlabeled single
associated value enum case (and the type of
ParenPattern).
3. As the type for an `(X)` TypeRepr
For 1, this leads to some odd behavior, e.g the
type of `(5.0 * 5).squareRoot()` is `(Double)`. For
2, we should be checking the arity of the enum case
constructor parameters and the presence of
ParenPattern respectively. Eventually we ought to
consider replacing Paren/TuplePattern with a
PatternList node, similar to ArgumentList.
3 is one case where it could be argued that there's
some utility in preserving the sugar of the type
that the user wrote. However it's really not clear
to me that this is particularly desirable since a
bunch of diagnostic logic is already stripping
ParenTypes. In cases where we care about how the
type was written in source, we really ought to be
consulting the TypeRepr.
During the lifecycle of a feature, it may start as an experimental feature and
then graduate to become an upcoming feature. To preserve compatibility with
projects that adopted the feature when it was experimental,
`-enable-experimental-feature` ought to be able to enable upcoming features,
too.
Since projects may use `-enable-experimental-feature` for compatibility with an
older toolchain that does not have the feature as an upcoming feature, there is
no warning when the flag is used to enable an upcoming feature.
Note that if the semantics of a feature change when it graduates from
experimental to upcoming, then the feature must be renamed so that projects
using the experimental feature have an opportunity opt-in to the new semantics
of the upcoming feature.
Resolves rdar://134276783.
Some editors use diagnostics from SourceKit to replace build issues. This causes issues if the diagnostics from SourceKit are formatted differently than the build issues. Make sure they are rendered the same way, removing most uses of `DiagnosticsEditorMode`.
To do so, always emit the `add stubs for conformance` note (which previously was only emitted in editor mode) and remove all `; add <something>` suffixes from notes that state which requirements are missing.
rdar://129283608
