Disable the assert:
// At least one payload is non-empty (otherwise this // would get laid out as a non-payload enum) assert(getNumNonEmptyPayloadCases() > 0);
in TaggedMultiPayloadEnumTypeInfo because it fails when you have
generic but zero-sized payload enum cases.
Also remove unnecessary "REQUIRES: objc_interop" lines from the enum
reflection tests.
This adds a new reflection record type carrying spare bit information for multi-payload enums.
The compiler includes this for any type that might need it in order to accurately reflect the contents of the enum. The RemoteMirror library will use this if present to determine how to project the contents of the enum. If not present (for example, in older binaries), the RemoteMirror library falls back on an internal calculation of the spare bitmask.
A few notes:
* The internal calculation is not perfect. In particular, it does not support MPEs that contain other enums (e.g., optionals). It should accurately refuse to project any MPE that it does not correctly support.
* The new reflection field is designed to be expandable; this might someday avoid the need for a new section.
Resolves rdar://61158214
This code rearchitects and simplifies the projectEnumValue support by
introducing a new `TypeInfo` subclass for each kind of enum, including trivial,
no-payload, single-payload, and three different classes for multi-payload enums:
* "UnsupportedEnum" that we don't understand. This returns "don't know" answers for all requests in cases where the runtime lacks enough information to accurately handle a particular enum.
* MP Enums that only use a separate tag value. This includes generic enums and other dynamic layouts, as well as enums whose payloads have no spare bits.
* MP Enums that use spare bits, possibly in addition to a separate tag. This logic can only be used, of course, if we can in fact compute a spare bit mask that agrees with the compiler.
The final challenge is to choose one of the above three handlings for every MPE. Currently, we do not have an accurate source of information for the spare bit mask, so we never choose the third option above. We use the second option for dynamic MPE layouts (including generics) and the first for everything else.
TODO: Once we can arrange for the compiler to expose spare bit mask data, we'll be able to use that to drive more MPE cases.
