Due to the fact that AnyClass is not Hashable, and that currently
NSKeyedArchiver/Unarchiver work with NSObject-derived, NSCoding
compliant classes, we are marking the decodeObjectOfClasses API refined
for Swift in our objc header and providing the desired overlay in our
overlay as shown below.
Arrays were also considered (for both API), but the underlying
implementation is entirely set-based, and using Arrays in Swift vs Sets
in objective C felt like too far a deviation.
Patch by Michael LeHew Jr.
Changes to the Dictionary test are caused by bumping the Fonudation API
epoch and taking in a fix in the types used in an NSDictionary
initializer.
rdar://21486551
Swift SVN r30297
This fixes a surprising number of compiler crashers. The reason this is an issue
at all is because we visit variables before their parent pattern binding decls.
(At least, that's one of the reasons...)
Swift SVN r30293
into trouble when we dive into a subexpr of a ClosureExpr, because that subexpr
may refer to type variables on the closureexpr's parameters.
Check for this case, and refuse to dive into the subexpr in this case. It would
be great to rewrite the closure parameter types to Type() or ErrorType or something
so that we can proceed even in this case, but this causes us to fail to catch
nested constraint checking failures.
This was figured out while working on other things, but fixes a validation test.
Swift SVN r30135
Otherwise, the length of the sequence is in principle lost. If you know
you have a sequence of less than 100 elements, you still want to know
exactly how many elements you initialized from it.
Swift SVN r30104
The way we pass and compose source locations, messages, etc. needs to be
brought under control before too many more tests get written. This is
the first step.
Swift SVN r29928
Remove these standard library types in favor of (T) -> () closures.
It was originally believed that generic optimizations would make these
types profitable, however:
// FIXME: Insert benchmarks here.
rdar://problem/21663799
Swift SVN r29927
Compiler output at least up to serialization should be deterministic at this point,
at least when not taking SIL into account. This /should/ mean that changing a
function body should not affect the final built swiftmodule, which means downstream
targets don't need to be rebuilt. Leaving the previous swiftmodule output in place
signals that.
A while back I put in a push to get all the non-determinism out of type checking,
importing, and serialization itself; it looks like we've finally made it. Let's keep
it that way!
rdar://problem/20539158 and others
Swift SVN r29923
Add a shared buffer to every range replaceable mutable collection to
track logical mutations, and invalidate all indices on every mutation.
Swift SVN r29917
For now, just update NameLookup's FindLocalVal to use a
VisibleDeclConsumer just like lookupVisibleDecl().
A subsequent patch will continue removing duplicated code
now that this is place.
This fixes compiler crashers where we were not handling
declarations with duplicate names (which of course is an
error, diagnosed elsewhere).
Swift SVN r29913
