The names of the private witness table accessor thunks we generate for
an opaque return type mangle the concrete conformance of the underlying
type.
If a conformance requirement of the opaque return type was witnessed by
a conditional conformance of a variadic generic type, we would crash
because of an unimplemented case in the mangler.
Fixes rdar://problem/125668798.
Emit metadata for runtime checks of conformances of associated types to
invertible protocols, e.g., `T.Assoc: Copyable`. This allows us to
correctly handle, e.g., dynamic casting involving conditional
conformances that have such constraints.
The model we use here is to emit an invertible-protocol constraint
that leaves only the specific bit clear in the invertible protocol
set.
Invertible protocols are currently always mangled with `Ri`, followed by
a single letter for each invertible protocol (e.g., `c` and `e` for
`Copyable` and `Escapable`, respectively), followed by the generic
parameter index. However, this requires that we extend the mangling
for any future invertible protocols, which mean they won't be
backward compatible.
Replace this mangling with one that mangles the bit # for the
invertible protocol, e.g., `Ri_` (followed by the generic parameter
index) is bit 0, which is `Copyable`. `Ri0_` (then generic parameter
index) is bit 1, which is `Escapable`. This allows us to round-trip
through mangled names for any invertible protocol, without any
knowledge of what the invertible protocol is, providing forward
compatibility. The same forward compatibility is present in all
metadata and the runtime, allowing us to add more invertible
protocols in the future without updating any of them, and also
allowing backward compatibility.
Only the demangling to human-readable strings maps the bit numbers
back to their names, and there's a fallback printing with just the bit
number when appropriate.
Also generalize the mangling a bit to allow for mangling of invertible
requirements on associated types, e.g., `S.Sequence: ~Copyable`. This
is currently unsupported by the compiler or runtime, but that may
change, and it was easy enough to finish off the mangling work for it.
Pitch - https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/2305
Changes highlights:
dependsOn(paramName) and dependsOn(scoped argName) syntax
dependsOn(paramName) -> copy lifetime dependence for all parameters/self except
when we have Escapable parameters/self, we assign scope
lifetime dependence.
Allow lifetime dependence on parameters without ownership modifier.
Always infer copy lifetime dependence except when we have
Escapable parameters/self, we infer scope lifetime dependence.
Allow lifetime dependence inference on parameters without ownership modifier.
For entities that must be part of the primary definition of a type,
mangle without inverses on the generic parameters of the enclosing
type. This ensures that we can adopt noncopyable on the generic
parameters without breaking the mangling of the fundamental entities
that describe the layout of the type.
Do this for enum elements first, so we don't break the mangling of
`Optional`. There will be other cases to consider as well.
This way distributed thunks could be formed in contexts that don't
know what concrete actor they'd be dispatched to on the other side
i.e. `distributed` members in protocol extensions should refer to
protocol requirement accessors.
This includes runtime support for instantiating transferring param/result in
function types. This is especially important since that is how we instantiate
function types like: typealias Fn = (transferring X) -> ().
rdar://123118061
[transferring] Implement transferring result and clean up transferring param support by making transferring a bit on param instead of a ParamSpecifier.
The reason why I am doing this is that I am going to be changing transferring to
not be a true ParamSpecifier. Instead, it is going to be a bit on Param that
changes the default ParamSpecifier used. That being said, I cannot use consuming
for this purpose since consuming today implies no implicit copy semantics, which
we do not want unless the user specifically asks for it by writing consuming.
Test shadowed variable of same type
Fully type check caller side macro expansion
Skip macro default arg caller side expr at decl primary
Test macro expand more complex expressions
Set synthesized expression as implicit
Add test case for with argument, not compiling currently
Test with swiftinterface
Always use the string representation of the default argument
Now works across module boundary
Check works for multiple files
Make default argument expression work in single file
Use expected-error
Disallow expression macro as default argument
Using as a sub expression in default argument still allowed as expression macros behave the same as built-in magic literals
Requirements for invertible protocols are always assumed to exist
unless opted-out via an inverse requirement. Thus, it's the
absence of those requirements that will (eventually) get mangled
into symbols.
When an actual instance of a distributed actor is on the local node, it is
has the capabilities of `Actor`. This isn't expressible directly in the type
system, because not all `DistributedActor`s are `Actor`s, nor is the
opposite true.
Instead, provide an API `DistributedActor.asLocalActor` that can only
be executed when the distributed actor is known to be local (because
this API is not itself `distributed`), and produces an existential
`any Actor` referencing that actor. The resulting existential value
carries with it a special witness table that adapts any type
conforming to the DistributedActor protocol into a type that conforms
to the Actor protocol. It is "as if" one had written something like this:
extension DistributedActor: Actor { }
which, of course, is not permitted in the language. Nonetheless, we
lovingly craft such a witness table:
* The "type" being extended is represented as an extension context,
rather than as a type context. This hasn't been done before, all Swift
runtimes support it uniformly.
* A special witness is provided in the Distributed library to implement
the `Actor.unownedExecutor` operation. This witness back-deploys to the
Swift version were distributed actors were introduced (5.7). On Swift
5.9 runtimes (and newer), it will use
`DistributedActor.unownedExecutor` to support custom executors.
* The conformance of `Self: DistributedActor` is represented as a
conditional requirement, which gets satisfied by the witness table
that makes the type a `DistributedActor`. This makes the special
witness work.
* The witness table is *not* visible via any of the normal runtime
lookup tables, because doing so would allow any
`DistributedActor`-conforming type to conform to `Actor`, which would
break the safety model.
* The witness table is emitted on demand in any client that needs it.
In back-deployment configurations, there may be several witness tables
for the same concrete distributed actor conforming to `Actor`.
However, this duplication can only be observed under fairly extreme
circumstances (where one is opening the returned existential and
instantiating generic types with the distributed actor type as an
`Actor`, then performing dynamic type equivalence checks), and will
not be present with a new Swift runtime.
All of these tricks together mean that we need no runtime changes, and
`asLocalActor` back-deploys as far as distributed actors, allowing it's
use in `#isolation` and the async for...in loop.
It's not clear that its worth keeping this as a
base class for SerializedAbstractClosure and
SerializedTopLevelCodeDecl, most clients are
interested in the concrete kinds, not only whether
the context is serialized.
I am doing this in preparation for adding options to SILParameterInfo/
SILResultInfo that state that a parameter/result is transferring. Even though I
could have just introduced a new bit here, I instead streamlined the interface
of SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo to use an OptionSet instead of individual bits
to make it easier to add new flags here. The reason why it is easier is that
along API (e.x.: function argument) boundaries one does not have to marshal each
field or pass each field. Instead one can just pass the whole OptionSet as an
opaque thing. Using this I was able to change serialization/deserialization of
SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo so that one does not need to update them if one
adds new fields!
The reason why I am doing this for both SILParameterInfo/SILResultInfo in the
same commit is because they share code in the demangler that I did not want to
have to duplicate in an intervening commit. By changing them both at the same
type, I didn't have to change anything without an actual need to.
I am doing this in a separate commit from adding transferring support so I can
validate correctness using the tests for the options already supported
(currently only differentiability).
rdar://119329771
This layout allows adding pre-specializations for trivial types that have a different size, but the same stride. This is especially useful for collections, where the stride is the important factor.
The errorUnion type operation specifies how thrown error types are
combined when multiple errors are thrown in the same context. When
thrown error types can have type variables in them, we sometimes cannot
resolve the errorUnion until the type variables have substitutions. In
such cases, we need to persist the result of errorUnion in the
constraint solver.
Introduce the ErrorUnionType to do exactly that, and update the core
errorUnion operation to produce an ErrorUnionType when needed. At
present, this code is inert, because any errorUnion operation today
involves only concrete types. However, inference of thrown errors in
closures will introduce type variables, and depend on this.
We already need to track the inverses separate from the members in a
ProtocolCompositionType, since inverses aren't real types. Thus, the
only purpose being served by InverseType is to be eliminated by
RequirementLowering when it appears in a conformance requirement.
Instead, we introduce separate type InverseRequirement just to keep
track of which inverses we encounter to facilitate cancelling-out
defaults and ensuring that the inverses are respected after running
the RequirementMachine.
Yet more preprocessor metaprogramming to eliminate per-macro-role boilerplate
in the compiler. This time, focused on mangling, demangling, and remangling
of the accessor macro roles.
