This change introduces a new compilation target platform to the Swift compiler - visionOS.
- Changes to the compiler build infrastrucuture to support building compiler-adjacent artifacts and test suites for the new target.
- Addition of the new platform kind definition.
- Support for the new platform in language constructs such as compile-time availability annotations or runtime OS version queries.
- Utilities to read out Darwin platform SDK info containing platform mapping data.
- Utilities to support re-mapping availability annotations from iOS to visionOS (e.g. 'updateIntroducedPlatformForFallback', 'updateDeprecatedPlatformForFallback', 'updateObsoletedPlatformForFallback').
- Additional tests exercising platform-specific availability handling and availability re-mapping fallback code-path.
- Changes to existing test suite to accomodate the new platform.
The implementation of `#if hasAttribute(...)` only accepted declaration
attributes. It should also accept type attributes, like `@retroactive`.
Resolves rdar://125195051
Custom attributes like global actors carry crucial semantic information
and should never be suppressed in the ASTPrinter. In particular,
`printQuickHelpDeclaration()` sets `PrintImplicitAttrs` to false,
but it's important for quick help / cursor info to include global
actors.
Our standard conception of suppressible features assumes we should
always suppress the feature if the compiler doesn't support it.
This presumes that there's no harm in suppressing the feature, and
that's a fine assumption for features that are just adding information
or suppressing new diagnostics. Features that are semantically
relevant, maybe even ABI-breaking, are not a good fit for this,
and so instead of reprinting the decl with the feature suppressed,
we just have to hide the decl entirely. The missing middle here
is that it's sometimes useful to be able to adopt a type change
to an existing declaration, and we'd like older compilers to be
able to use the older version of the declaration. Making a type
change this way is, of course, only really acceptable for
@_alwaysEmitIntoClient declarations; but those represent quite a
few declarations that we'd like to be able to refine the types of.
Rather than trying to come up with heuristics based on
@_alwaysEmitIntoClient or other sources of information, this design
just requires the declaration to opt in with a new attribute,
@_allowFeatureSuppress. When a declaration opts in to suppression
for a conditionally-suppressible feature, the printer uses the
suppression serially-print-with-downgraded-options approach;
otherwise it uses the print-only-if-feature-is-available approach.
When determining whether a declaration should be considered unavailable at
runtime, ignore `@available` attributes for application extension platforms but
continue searching for other `@available` attributes that might still make the
declaration unavailable. This ensures corner cases like these are handled:
```
// Dubious, but allowed
@available(macOS, unavailable)
@available(macOSApplicationExtension, unavailable)
public func doublyUnavailableOnMacOSFunc() {}
// Expresses an uncommon, but valid constraint
@available(macCatalyst, unavailable)
@available(iOSApplicationExtension, unavailable)
public func confusingDiamondAvailabilityInheritanceFunc() {}
```
Use similar scheme as DeclAttribute.
* Create `BridgedTypeAttribute.createSimple()` and
`BridgedTypeAttributes.add()`, instead of
`BridgedTypeAttributes.addSimple()`
* Create `DeclAttributes::createSimple()` to align with `TypeAttribute`
The old TypeAttributes reprsentation wasn't too bad for a small number of
simple attributes. Unfortunately, the number of attributes has grown over
the years by quite a bit, which makes TypeAttributes fairly bulky even at
just a single SourceLoc per attribute. The bigger problem is that we want
to carry more information than that on some of these attributes, which is
all super ad hoc and awkward. And given that we want to do some things
for each attribute we see, like diagnosing unapplied attributes, the linear
data structure does require a fair amount of extra work.
I switched around the checking logic quite a bit in order to try to fit in
with the new representation better. The most significant change here is the
change to how we handle implicit noescape, where now we're passing the
escaping attribute's presence down in the context instead of resetting the
context anytime we see any attributes at all. This should be cleaner overall.
The source range changes around some of the @escaping checking is really a
sort of bugfix --- the existing code was really jumping from the @ sign
all the way past the autoclosure keyword in a way that I'm not sure always
works and is definitely a little unintentional-feeling.
I tried to make the parser logic more consistent around recognizing these
parameter specifiers; it seems better now, at least.
Obsolete the `-enable-swift3-objc-inference` option and related options by
removing support for inferring `@objc` attributes using Swift 3 rules.
Automated migration from Swift 3 has not been supported by the compiler for
many years.
We already need to track the inverses separate from the members in a
ProtocolCompositionType, since inverses aren't real types. Thus, the
only purpose being served by InverseType is to be eliminated by
RequirementLowering when it appears in a conformance requirement.
Instead, we introduce separate type InverseRequirement just to keep
track of which inverses we encounter to facilitate cancelling-out
defaults and ensuring that the inverses are respected after running
the RequirementMachine.
Add a new flag to enable package interface loading.
Use the last value of package-name in case of dupes.
Rename PrintInterfaceContentMode as InterfaceMode.
Update diagnostics.
Test package interface loading with various scenarios.
Test duplicate package-name.
It has an extension .package.swiftinterface and contains package decls
as well as SPIs and public/inlinable decls. When a module is loaded
from interface, it now looks up the package-name in the interface
and checks if the importer is in the same package. If so, it uses
that package interface found to load the module. If not, uses the existing
logic to load modules.
Resolves rdar://104617854
To match terminology used elsewhere in the compiler (e.g. "parsed accessor")
rename "original attributes" to "parsed atributes". Additionally, make sure the
attributes returned by `getParsedAttrs()` really are just the parsed ones by
skipping implicit attributes in addition to the ones expanded from macros.
When printing the CustomAttrs attached to a decl, those attrs may not have been
type checked yet if lazy typechecking is enabled. We need to make sure that
printing invokes a request that will resolve the type.
Resolves rdar://117443319
This attribute instructs the compiler that this function declaration
should be "import"ed from host environment. It's equivalent of Clang's
`__attribute__((import_module("module"), import_name("field")))`
This attribute instructs the compiler that this function declaration
should be "export"ed from this .wasm module. It's equivalent of Clang's
`__attribute__((export_name("name")))`
In order to support lazy typechecking during module emission for modules
containing specialized functions, the computation of generic signatures for
`@_specialized` attributes must be requestified.
Resolves rdar://115569606
Provide member macros with similar information about conformances to
what extension macros receive, allowing member macros to document
which conformances they care about (e.g., Decodable) and then
receiving the list of conformances that aren't already available for
the type in question. For example, a macro such as
@attached(member, conformances: Decodable, Encodable, names:
named(init(from:), encode(to:)))
macro Codable() = ...
Expanded on a type that is not already Decodable/Encodable would be
provided with Decodable and Encodable (via the new
`missingConformancesTo:` argument to the macro implementation) when
the type itself does not conform to those types.
Member macros still cannot produce conformances, so this is likely to
be used in conjunction with extension macros most of the time. The
extension macro declares the conformance, and can also declare any
members that shouldn't be part of the primary type definition---such
as initializers that shouldn't suppress the memberwise initializer. On
the other hand, the member macro will need to define any members that
must be in the primary definition, such as required initializers,
members that must be overridable by subclasses, and stored properties.
Codable synthesis is an example that benefits from member macros with
conformances, because for classes it wants to introduce a required
initializer for decoding and an overridable encode operation, and
these must be members of the nominal type itself. Specifically, the
`Codable` macro above is likely to have two attached member roles:
@attached(member, conformances: Decodable, Encodable, names:
named(init(from:), encode(to:)))
@attached(extension, conformances: Decodable, Encodable, names:
named(init(from:), encode(to:)))
macro Codable() = ...
where the "extension" role is responsible for defining the conformance
(always), and the "member" creates the appropriate members for classes
(`init` vs. `required init`).
Tracked by rdar://112532829.
