Calling '@objc optional func' requires '?' or '!' after its name. When
completing method calls for them, 'key.sourcetext' should have '?'
whereas 'key.name' shouldn't.
Note that we deliberately do not use optional type name for
'key.typename'. This is consistent with optional chain '?.<propertyName>'
behavior.
rdar://problem/37904574
For call argument completion, if the expected type and completion result type are
both GenericTypeParameterTypes, comparing them doesn't make sense we can't account
for their different contexts at this point in the code, and hit assertions in the
constraint solver if we try.
For now, don't attempt to add a type relation for this case.
Resolves rdar://problem/38153332.
This was caused by two separate issues:
1. If given a function type with an IUO return, it would add function call
completions, set Done=true, and then progress to some logic to add
completions for the unwrapped type of optionals. That code would check if
the corresponding decl has the IUO attribute set and, if it was but couldn't
be unwrapped, assert. For function types, it now early exits after adding
call completions.
2. If given the type of a bound (`blah?.`) or forced (`blah!.`) optional,
the type is non-optional and can't be unwrapped and the decl still has the
IUO so it asserts. Refined the assertion to account for this case.
Resolves rdar://problem/38188989.
Rather than relying on the NameAliasType we get by default for references
to non-generic typealiases, use BoundNameAliasType consistently to handle
references to typealiases that are formed by the type checker.
This doesn't have a specific effect now, because all of these places
are likely to only see NameAliasType, but it is refactoring with the
intent of eliminating NameAliasType entirely.
* Implement #warning and #error
* Fix #warning/#error in switch statements
* Fix AST printing for #warning/#error
* Add to test case
* Add extra handling to ParseDeclPoundDiagnostic
* fix dumping
* Consume the right paren even in the failure case
* Diagnose extra tokens on the same line after a diagnostic directive
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
Update the code that prints types for constructor results to take
into account IUO types being removed from the type system.
NFC on master. Results in better fidelity with what we have today when
IUOs are removed from the type system in a future commit.
[ClangImporter] Make sure that headers from the bridging header are considered 'isBeforeInTranslationUnit' compared to headers imported from swift code
This has three principal advantages:
- It gives some additional type-safety when working
with known accessors.
- It makes it significantly easier to test whether a declaration
is an accessor and encourages the use of a common idiom.
- It saves a small amount of memory in both FuncDecl and its
serialized form.
As soon as you had one &&/|| in your chain of expressions we would lose
infix completions for Bool because we got confused by the autoclosure,
so strip it off.
rdar://32016622
Constructor call patterns already get a real priority, but because of
the way we do function call patterns we don't have enough information,
and previously we were setting it to "expression specific", which is
unnecessarily high, particularly since functions (unlike inits) have
other better ways to code-complete already.
rdar://31113161
When completing
Foo(<here>
We will now provide
bar: <#value#>
instead of
bar: <#value#>)
Inserting the rparen caused some problems in practice:
* the old behaviour optimized for typing Foo(<complete> instead of
Foo(<complete>), which can conflict with user behaviours or ...
* in editors with automatic brace-matching, we often conflicted with the
editor, leading to extraneous closing parens
And in general, it is much more predictable for tooling to either insert
matching ( and ) or to not insert either. While this change may not be
ideal For users of editors that do not do automatic brace-matching, I
believe it is still better overall to have to type a missing paren than
to have to delete an extraneous one.
rdar://31113161
The original hope was we could make these heuristics really good, but
since that is not currently in sight (and may never be), we want to be
able to turn them off. For now, just plumb through an internal flag to
control the behaviour. A future change will customize the behaviour in
SourceKit.
rdar://31113161
Except GenericEnvironment.h, because you can't meaningfully use a
GenericEnvironment without its signature. Lots less depends on
GenericSignature.h now. NFC
... and UnicodeScalar, which is technically more correct than only
showing it for String. This also happens to workaround a bug where we
won't show "" for string.contains.
rdar://problem/34746368
In one place we were calling hasError() and in another directly checking
for ErrorType; if we had a type containing an ErrorType as a structural
component, we would hit an assertion.
