This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
The code completion might occur inside an attriubte that isn’t part of the AST because it’s missing a `VarDecl` that it could be attached to. In these cases, record the `CustomAttr` and type check it standalone, pretending it was part of a `DeclContext`.
This also fixes a few issues where code completion previously wouldn’t find the attribute constructor call and thus wasn’t providing code completion inside the property wrapper.
rdar://92842803
This bool was true only for single-expression closure and function bodies that
do not have an explicit `return` in the source. Rename it and its associated
methods, to avoid confusion with the hasSingleExpressionBody methods on
ClosureExpr and AbstractFuncDecl. Those don't care whether the expression was
explicitly written in the source or not.
If the type check return type from the context has unresolved types, it
can't be used for checking convertibility. Fallback to get
'TypeContextInfo' of the closure position.
rdar://problem/66002497
instead of the pre-typechecked type and the referenced decl in the AST
so that we can suggests all overloads even if it happen to be
typechecked to a method. For example
struct MyType {
func foo() {}
func foo(_ int: Int) {}
func foo(name: String, value: String) {}
}
func test(val: MyType) {
value.foo(#^COMPLETE^#)
}
In this case, the call is typechecked to 'MyType.foo(_:)', but we want
to suggest all overloads.
rdar://problem/59285399
When completing in the only expression of closure, use the return type
of the closure as the type context for the code-completion. However,
since code-completion may be on an incomplete input, we only use the
return type to improve the quality of the result, not to mark it
invalid, since (a) we may add another statement afterwards, or (b) if
the context type is Void it doesn't need to match the value.
Instead of re-typechecking parsed expression, find typechecked
expression that corresponds to the parsed expression from the
typechecked decl context, because the sub expressions of the parsed
expression can be weirdly mutated/replaced by decl context typechecking.
rdar://problem/48141174
`source.request.conformingmethods` is a new SourceKit request which
receives a source position and a list of protocol namses, returns a list
of methods whose return type conforms to the requested protocols.
rdar://problem/44699573
