Instead of creating the AST directly in the parser (and libSyntax or
SwiftSyntax via SyntaxParsingContext), make Parser to explicitly create
a tree of ParsedSyntaxNodes. Their OpaqueSyntaxNodes can be either
libSyntax or SwiftSyntax. If AST is needed, it can be generated from the
libSyntax tree.
In parser, 'parseExprPostfixSuffix()' can parse postfix expression for
'super'. 'parseExprSuper()' doesn't need to parse them.
In code-completion, 'completeExprSuper()' and 'completeExprSuperDot()'
can be consolidated to 'completePostfixExpr()' and 'completeDotExpr()'.
For invalid code, lexer is forgiving enough to allow single quote '\'' as the starting point
of string literals. Later, parser assumes the string literals are always using double quote "\"", and passes
such knowledge to SwiftSyntax side, leading to the round-trip failure we observed in the radar.
This commit fixes the issue by introducing another token kind for single quote.
rdar://51071021
This change permits UnresolvedDotExpr to have both a name and a base that are implicit, but a valid DotLoc, and to treat that DotLoc as the node’s location. It then changes the generation of string interpolation code so that `$stringInterpolation.appendInterpolation` references have a DotLoc corresponding to the backslash in the string literal.
This makes it possible for `ExprContextAnalyzer` in IDE to correctly detect when you are code-completing in a string interpolation and treat it as an `appendInterpolation` call.
Now that we manipulate the argument list to correct strange interpolations in Sema, we can parse interpolations directly as argument lists, simplifying the parser.
By itself, this refactoring causes a code completion regression; a subsequent commit will fix that.
This defers diagnosis until a stage where #if conditions have definitely been evaluated, at the cost of a slightly more complex implementation. We’ll gain some of that complexity back in a subsequent refactoring. Fixes SR-9937.
Allow the use of declarations whose names start with $ in all
modes. However, normal code cannot define new entities with names that
start with $: only the implementation can do that, e.g., for property
delegates.
Instead of re-typechecking parsed expression, find typechecked
expression that corresponds to the parsed expression from the
typechecked decl context, because the sub expressions of the parsed
expression can be weirdly mutated/replaced by decl context typechecking.
rdar://problem/48141174
This eliminates the overhead of ParsedRawSyntaxNode needing to do memory management.
If ParsedRawSyntaxNode needs to point to some data the memory is allocated from a bump allocator.
There are also some improvements on how the ParsedSyntaxBuilders work.
Doing a "direct ParsedSyntaxRecorder::record[some syntax]" call from the parser is not a good idea due to possibility
of being in a backtracking context when the call is made. Replace them with "ParsedSyntaxRecorder::make[some syntax]"
which will implicitly check for backtracking and create a recorded or deferred node accordingly.
Instead of creating syntax nodes directly, modify the parser to invoke an abstract interface 'SyntaxParseActions' while it is parsing the source code.
This decouples the act of parsing from the act of forming a syntax tree representation.
'SyntaxTreeCreator' is an implementation of SyntaxParseActions that handles the logic of creating a syntax tree.
To enforce the layering separation of parsing and syntax tree creation, a static library swiftSyntaxParse is introduced to compose the two.
This decoupling is important for introducing a syntax parser library for SwiftSyntax to directly access parsing.
Parsing collection literal expression used to take exponential time
depending on the nesting level of the first element.
Stop using 'parseList()' because using it complicates libSyntax parsing.
rdar://problem/45221238 / https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9220
rdar://problem/38913395 / https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7283
<rdar://problem/46548531> Extend @available to support PackageDescription
This introduces a new private availability kind "_PackageDescription" to
allow availability testing by an arbitary version that can be passed
using a new command-line flag "-swiftpm-manifest-version". The semantics
are exactly same as Swift version specific availability. In longer term,
it maybe possible to remove this enhancement once there is
a language-level availability support for 3rd party libraries.
Motivation:
Swift packages are configured using a Package.swift manifest file. The
manifest file uses a library called PackageDescription, which contains
various settings that can be configured for a package. The new additions
in the PackageDescription APIs are gated behind a "tools version" that
every manifest must declare. This means, packages don't automatically
get access to the new APIs. They need to update their declared tools
version in order to use the new API. This is basically similar to the
minimum deployment target version we have for our OSes.
This gating is important for allowing packages to maintain backwards
compatibility. SwiftPM currently checks for API usages at runtime in
order to implement this gating. This works reasonably well but can lead
to a poor experience with features like code-completion and module
interface generation in IDEs and editors (that use sourcekit-lsp) as
SwiftPM has no control over these features.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Dynamic replacements are currently written in extensions as
extension ExtendedType {
@_dynamicReplacement(for: replacedFun())
func replacement() { }
}
The runtime implementation allows an implementation in the future where
dynamic replacements are gather in a scope and can be dynamically
enabled and disabled.
For example:
dynamic_extension_scope CollectionOfReplacements {
extension ExtentedType {
func replacedFun() {}
}
extension ExtentedType2 {
func replacedFun() {}
}
}
CollectionOfReplacements.enable()
CollectionOfReplacements.disable()
For example, given:
[.foo(), .bar()]
If user want to insert another element in between:
[.foo(), <HERE> .bar()]
'.bar()' is probably not a part of the inserting element. Moreover, having
the suffix doesn't help type inference in any way.
