These are tests that fail in the next commit without this flag. This
does not add -verify-ignore-unrelated to all tests with -verify, only
the ones that would fail without it. This is NFC since this flag is
currently a no-op.
Some editors use diagnostics from SourceKit to replace build issues. This causes issues if the diagnostics from SourceKit are formatted differently than the build issues. Make sure they are rendered the same way, removing most uses of `DiagnosticsEditorMode`.
To do so, always emit the `add stubs for conformance` note (which previously was only emitted in editor mode) and remove all `; add <something>` suffixes from notes that state which requirements are missing.
rdar://129283608
The `isBoolType` operation within the Clang importer has a historical
definition that excludes the C++ `bool` and its use in C as an
extension. Retain that definition, and check for the actual `bool`
when importing C++ conversion functions into Swift.
Fixes two regressions in the Clang importer:
1. We started to import `bool`-typed Objective-C properties with their
getter names.
2. We started importing `bool`-typed Objective-C methods with an
NSError** parameter as `throws`.
Both of these changes could be considered improvements, but they
cannot be made without breaking source compatibility, so roll those
changes back to maintain source compatibility.
We should have a separate discussion about enabling this behavior for
Swift >= 6.
* [Sema] Reject `@objc` functions with incompatible property wrapper in params
rdar://99443365
When generating `@objc` functions, the parameters were not checked for property wrapper and instead only the wrapped type was checked for compatibility. Added checks and diagnostics for incompatible property wrappers.
These conformances are banned when using NSObjectProtocl in the real
SDK. Adding the `self` member has exposed these few places and started
diagnosing them as invalid again.
When `nil` is passed as an argument to call with multiple overloads
it's possible that this would result in ambiguity where matched
expected argument type doesn't conform to `ExpressibleByNilLiteral`.
To handle situations like this locator for contextual mismatch
has to be adjusted to point to the call where `nil` is used, so
`diagnoseAmbiguityWithFixes` can identify multiple overloads and
produce a correct ambiguity diagnostic.
Resolves: rdar://75514153
* [TypeChecker] Enclosing stubs protocol note within editor mode
* [test] Removing note from test where there is no -diagnostics-editor-mode flag
* Formatting modified code
* [tests] Fixing tests under validation-tests
Detect and diagnose contextual failures originating in an attempt
to convert `nil` to some other non-optional type e.g.
```swift
let _: Int = nil // can't initialize `Int` with `nil`
func foo() -> Int {
return nil // can't return `nil` from `foo`
}
_ = 1 + nil // there is no `+` overload which accepts `Int` and optional
```
Under non-editor mode, the fixit for inserting protocol stubs is associated with a note
pointing to the missing protocol member declaration which could stay in a separate file from
the conforming type, leading to the behavior of rdar://51534405. This change checks if
the fixit is in a separate file and issues another note to carry the fixit if so.
rdar://51534405
Extend use of "instance member on type" fix to cover potentially
invalid partial applications, references to instance members on
metatypes, and remove related and now obsolete code from `CSDiag`.
Resolves: [SR-9415](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-9415)
The special rule for NSUInteger in system headers was colliding with
the behavior of NS_TYPED_ENUM (swift_newtype/swift_wrapper). Let
NS_TYPED_ENUM take precedence here.
(I also future-proofed this for BOOL and Boolean, but those don't
NS_TYPED_ENUM correctly right now for another reason: Bool is bridged
to Objective-C via NSNumber, but ObjCBool is not, even though it could
be.)
rdar://problem/50076612
When we determine that an optional value needs to be unwrapped to make
an expression type check, use notes to provide several different
Fix-It options (with descriptions) rather than always pushing users
toward '!'. Specifically, the errors + Fix-Its now looks like this:
error: value of optional type 'X?' must be unwrapped to a value of
type 'X'
f(x)
^
note: coalesce using '??' to provide a default when the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
?? <#default value#>
note: force-unwrap using '!' to abort execution if the optional
value contains 'nil'
f(x)
^
!
Fixes rdar://problem/42081852.
• Change name to match names of member diagnostics.
• Explicitly call out that this is a "value of type". This matches the error from non-existent methods and properties.
• Don't call them "subscript members". That term is never used in documentation and "member" doesn't add anything besides confusion.
Ensure that we grab the decl from the subscript expression so that we
can check whether it returns an IUO.
Also add tests for subscripts and failable inits.
These warnings are turning out to be pretty noisy for code that
declares IUOs (e.g. for @IBOutlets) and then passes them to
Objective-C APIs with parameters declared as _Nonnull id.
Since we bridge non-nil values successfully in most cases, and
previuosly written and correctly executing code is either not seeing
nil values passed in or are handling the nil (which is bridged as
NSNull), it seems like a nuisance to warn about these for existing
Swift versions.
We'll conditionalize the warning, and then users can deal with these
when moving to the new language version.
Fixes: rdar://problem/39886178
* [Diagnostics] SR-7445 Improve diagnostics for assignment failures
* modified messages for assignments to function calls,
modified messages for assignments to methods.
removed comment for resolved radar.
* removed extra line and braces
* added tests for assignment_lhs_is_apply_expression
eliminated redundant literal check which is always invoked before call
reverted 'cannot assign to value' for literal assignments in subexpressions
* Complemented assigning to literal tests & reverted to 'cannot asign to value' for methods (was 'cannot assign to member')
* removed extra tabs
* eliminated one more accidental spacing
* Update CSDiag.cpp
* added highlighting, fixed & rechecked tests
* added highlighting for complex expressions involving assigning to literals
Resolves: [SR-7445](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-7445)
When lazily resolving witnesses, we would fail to diagnose missing
witnesses for which we had no specific diagnostic to give, leading to
AST verifier errors and crashes later on. Make sure we call the
operation to diagnose missing witnesses along these paths, too.
Fixes SR-7364 / rdar://problem/39239629 as well as the older
rdar://problem/36278079.
This allows them to be used in generic arguments for NSArray et al.
We already do this for the ones that wrap bridged values (like
NSString/String), but failed to do it for objects that /weren't/
bridged to Swift values (class instances and protocol compositions),
or for Error-which-is-special.
In addition to this being a sensible thing to do, /not/ doing this led
to IRGen getting very confused (i.e. crashing) when we imported a
Objective-C protocol that actually used an NS_TYPED_ENUM in this way.
(We actually shouldn't be using Swift's IRGen logic to emit protocol
descriptors for imported protocols at all, because it's possible we
weren't able to import all the requirements. But that's a separate
issue.)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-6844
Swift currently assumes that copies and deinitializations of C structs
are always "trivial", i.e. a copy can be done by just copying the raw
bits of the value, and a deinit requires no work at all. Until we do
anything to change that, just don't import any of the new C structs
that have non-trivial copy or deinitialization operations (those with
ARC references in them).
rdar://problem/35698831
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
For Swift 3 / 4:
Deprecate the spelling "ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional", emitting a warning
and suggesting "!" in places where they are allowed according to
SE-0054.
In places where SE-0054 disallowed IUOs but we continued to accept them
in previous compilers, emit a warning suggesting "Optional" or "?" as
an alternative depending on context and treat the IUO as an Optional,
noting this in the diagnostic.
For Swift 5:
Treat "ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional" as an error, suggesting
"!" in places where they are allowed by SE-0054.
In places where SE-0054 disallowed IUOs, emit an error suggestion
"Optional" or "?" as an alternative depending on context.
Typedefs tend to be imported without bridging the underlying
type. However, when a typedef is used within a bridging context, we
should bridge based on the underlying type. That wasn't being done
consistently, causing us to import various typedefs without bridging
at all. Update the logic to use the bridged underlying type whenever
the (often unbridged) typedef type itself doesn't line up.
Fixes rdar://problem/34913507.
