In code like the following:
```
protocol P { associatedtype A: Hashable }
protocol Q { associatedtype A: Comparable }
func fn<T: P & Q>(_: T) where T.A == Int { … }
```
`T.A` is actually the union of `P.A` and `Q.A`—it satisfies both associated types and has both of their constraints. This means it doesn’t actually make sense to apply a module selector to `A`—even if `P` and `Q` are in different modules, `T.A` always represents both of the declarations, not one or the other. We therefore now ban module selectors in this position, since they don’t actually jibe with the nature of a generic signature.
This justification technically doesn’t hold for *every* member type of a generic parameter—a member type can refer to a concrete typealias in a protocol extension, for instance—but in those situations, you can disambiguate (and add module selectors) by writing `P.A` or `Q.A` instead of `T.A`, so we’re not really worried about this limitation.
