Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Doug Gregor
e4cf74abfa Update expected diagnostics to match what SwiftIfConfig produces
For the most part, the differences between the diagnostics introduced
by the C++ implementation and the new SwiftIfConfig implementation are
cosmetic, so these are only wording changes.

The one major difference is that we've dropped the warnings about
potential typos in os/arch checks. For example, if one writes:

    #if os(bisionos)
    // ...
    #endif

The C++ implementation will produce a warning "unknown operating system
for build configuration 'os'" with a note asking "did you mean
'visionOS'"? These warnings rely on a static list of known operating
systems and architectures, which is somewhat unfortunate: the whole
point of these checks is that the Swift you're dealing with might not
have support for those operating systems/architectures, so while these
warnings can be helpful in a few cases, they also cause false
positives when porting. Therefore, I chose not to bring them forward.
2024-08-24 21:31:41 -07:00
Becca Royal-Gordon
3843c7cd5e Update SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION language features
The `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` define is used to stamp a vendor’s version number into a Swift compiler binary. It can be queried from Swift code using `#if _compiler_version` and from Clang by using a preprocessor definition called `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION`. These are unsupported compiler-internal features used primarily by Apple Swift.

In Swift 1.0 through 5.5, Apple Swift used a scheme for `SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` where the major version matched the embedded clang (e.g. 1300 for Apple Clang 13.0.0) and the minor version was ignored. Starting in Swift 5.6, Apple Swift started using major and minor version numbers that matched the Swift.org version number. This makes them easier to understand, but it means that version 1300.0.x was followed by version 5.6.x. Not only did version numbers go backwards, but also the old logic to ignore minor versions was now a liability, because it meant you would not be able to target a change to 5.7.x compilers but not 5.6.x compilers.

This commit addresses the problem by:

* Modifying the existing `#if _compiler_version(string-literal)` feature so it transforms the major version into a major and minor that will compare correctly to new version numbers. For instance, “1300.*” is transformed into “1.300”, which will compare correctly to a “5.6” or “5.7” version even if it doesn’t really capture the fact that “1300” was a Swift 5.5 compiler. As a bonus, this allows you to use the feature to backwards-compatibly test new compilers using the existing feature: “5007.*” will be seen by compilers before 5.7 as an unknown future version, but will be seen by 5.7 compilers as targeting them.

* Modifying the `__SWIFT_COMPILER_VERSION` clang define similarly so that, to preprocessor conditions written for the old scheme, a 5.7 compiler will appear to have major version 5007.

* Adding a new variant of `#if _compiler_version` with the same syntax as `#if swift` and `#if compiler`—that is, taking a comparison operator and a bare set of dotted version numbers, rather than a string literal. Going forward, this will be how version checks are written once compatibility with compilers before this change is no longer a concern.

These changes are only lightly tested because tests have to work without any compiler version defined (the default in most configurations), but I’ve tested what I can.

Fixes rdar://89841295.
2022-04-27 18:27:52 -07:00
David Farler
b7d17b25ba Rename -parse flag to -typecheck
A parse-only option is needed for parse performance tracking and the
current option also includes semantic analysis.
2016-11-28 10:50:55 -08:00
Robert Widmann
389f779a27 Fixup tests 2016-07-31 19:28:45 -07:00
Jordan Rose
7954be4d87 [test] Move BuildConfigurations/ to Parse/ConditionalCompilation/.
Also move a Parse test that's really about conditional compilation
directives into the new folder.
2016-02-12 11:10:32 -08:00