For the most part, the differences between the diagnostics introduced
by the C++ implementation and the new SwiftIfConfig implementation are
cosmetic, so these are only wording changes.
The one major difference is that we've dropped the warnings about
potential typos in os/arch checks. For example, if one writes:
#if os(bisionos)
// ...
#endif
The C++ implementation will produce a warning "unknown operating system
for build configuration 'os'" with a note asking "did you mean
'visionOS'"? These warnings rely on a static list of known operating
systems and architectures, which is somewhat unfortunate: the whole
point of these checks is that the Swift you're dealing with might not
have support for those operating systems/architectures, so while these
warnings can be helpful in a few cases, they also cause false
positives when porting. Therefore, I chose not to bring them forward.
As much as possible, we should avoid using `REQUIRES: maccatalyst_support`
since tests restricted this way are not run in PR tests. Many tests that
exercise macCatalyst behaviors can be run in a macOS configuration, without
full macCatalyst standard library support.
Also, adopt `%target-cpu` lit substitution where appropriate to avoid needless
standard library module rebuilds when running tests locally.
Add support for conditional compilation under macCatalyst
Developers can now detect whether they are compiling for macCatalyst at
compile time with:
#if targetEnvironment(macCatalyst)
// Code only compiled under macCatalyst.
#end
