Avoids an assertion failure emitting an `explicit_copy_value` on the trivial
value, which is unsupported. This allows `copy x` to compile, albeit with
no effect (which is not ideal, but also not a regression, since no-implicit-copy
controls still don't fully work on trivial values). Fixes#80573 and rdar://148712387.
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Today ParenType is used:
1. As the type of ParenExpr
2. As the payload type of an unlabeled single
associated value enum case (and the type of
ParenPattern).
3. As the type for an `(X)` TypeRepr
For 1, this leads to some odd behavior, e.g the
type of `(5.0 * 5).squareRoot()` is `(Double)`. For
2, we should be checking the arity of the enum case
constructor parameters and the presence of
ParenPattern respectively. Eventually we ought to
consider replacing Paren/TuplePattern with a
PatternList node, similar to ArgumentList.
3 is one case where it could be argued that there's
some utility in preserving the sugar of the type
that the user wrote. However it's really not clear
to me that this is particularly desirable since a
bunch of diagnostic logic is already stripping
ParenTypes. In cases where we care about how the
type was written in source, we really ought to be
consulting the TypeRepr.
Some notes:
1. I implemented this as a contextual keyword that can only apply directly to
lvalues. This ensures that we can still call functions called copy, define
variables named copy, etc. I added tests for both the c++ and swift-syntax based
parsers to validate this. So there shouldn't be any source breaks.
2. I did a little bit of type checker work to ensure that we do not treat
copy_expr's result as an lvalue. Otherwise, one could call mutating functions on
it or assign to it, which we do not want since the result of copy_value is
3. As expected, by creating a specific expr, I was able to have much greater
control of the SILGen codegen and thus eliminate extraneous copies and other
weirdness than if we used a function and had to go through SILGenApply.
rdar://101862423
