Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
The reason why is that we want to distinguish inbetween SILFunction's that are
marked as unspecified by SILGen and those that are parsed from textual SIL that
do not have any specified isolation. This will make it easier to write nice
FileCheck tests against SILGen output on what is the inferred isolation for
various items.
NFCI.
Instead of constructing an LValue and storing the result of the
stored property initializer to the lvalue, let's emit the call
of the stored property initializer directly into an initialization
pointing at the stored properties named by the pattern.
SIL type lowering erases DynamicSelfType, so we generate
incorrect code when casting to DynamicSelfType. Fixing this
requires a fair amount of plumbing, but most of the
changes are mechanical.
Note that the textual SIL syntax for casts has changed
slightly; the target type is now a formal type without a '$',
not a SIL type.
Also, the unconditional_checked_cast_value and
checked_cast_value_br instructions now take the _source_
formal type as well, just like the *_addr forms they are
intended to replace.
Since 'decl' was already a StructDecl, 'decl->getDeclContext()' was
giving us a non-generic module scope context.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-10075>.
For context, String, Nil, Bool, and Int already behave this way.
Note: Swift can compile against 80 or 64 bit floats as the builtin
literal type. Thus, it was necessary to capture this bit somehow in the
FloatLiteralExpr. This was done as another Type field capturing this
info.
For context, String, Nil, and Bool already behave this way.
Note: Before it used to construct (call, ... (integer_literal)), and the
call would be made explicit / implicit based on if you did eg: Int(3) or
just 3. This however did not translate to the new world so this PR adds
a IsExplicitConversion bit to NumberLiteralExpr. Some side results of
all this are that some warnings changed a little and some instructions are
emitted in a different order.
integer protocols changed the way basic arithmetic operations were
called. <rdar://29939484> has more information.
This commit re-enables those tests and updates the SIL that was checked
in the tests to be consistent with the one generated by the current
compiler.
<rdar://29939484>
This does not eliminate the entrypoints on SILBuilder yet. I want to do this in
two parts so that it is functionally easier to disentangle changing the APIs
above SILBuilder and changing the underlying instruction itself.
rdar://33440767
The SILGen testsuite consists of valid Swift code covering most language
features. We use these tests to verify that no unknown nodes are in the
file's libSyntax tree. That way we will (hopefully) catch any future
changes or additions to the language which are not implemented in
libSyntax.
I put in a simple fixup pass (MarkUninitializedFixup) for staging purposes. I
don't expect it to be in tree long. I just did not feel comfortable fixing up in
1 commit all of the passes up to DI.
rdar://31521023
The goal here is to make the short demangling as short and readable as possible, also at the cost of omitting some information.
The assumption is that whenever the short demangling is displayed, there is a way for the user to also get the full demangled name if needed.
*) omit <where ...> because it does not give useful information anyway
Deserializer.deserialize<A where ...> () throws -> [A]
--> Deserializer.deserialize<A> () throws -> [A]
*) for multiple specialized functions only emit a single “specialized”
specialized specialized Constructible.create(A.Element) -> Constructible<A>
--> specialized Constructible.create(A.Element) -> Constructible<A>
*) Don’t print function argument types:
foo(Int, Double, named: Int)
--> foo(_:_:named:)
This is a trade-off, because it can lead to ambiguity if there are overloads with different types.
*) make contexts of closures, local functions, etc. more readable by using “<a> in <b>” syntax
This is also done for the full and not only for the simplified demangling.
Renderer.(renderInlines([Inline]) -> String).(closure #1)
--> closure #1 in Renderer.renderInlines
*) change spacing, so that it matches our coding style:
foo <A> (x : A)
--> foo<A>(x: A)
Officially kick SILBoxType over to be "nominal" in its layout, with generic layouts structurally parameterized only by formal types. Change SIL to lower a capture to a nongeneric box when possible, or a box capturing the enclosing generic context when necessary.
When forming a call to an initialization function for a stored
property (e.g., which sets the default value for that stored
property), make sure to use the constructor's archetypes in the set of
substitutions provided in that call, rather than the enclosing type's
archetypes.
Use a syntax that declares the layout's generic parameters and fields,
followed by the generic arguments to apply to the layout:
{ var Int, let String } // A concrete box layout with a mutable Int
// and immutable String field
<T, U> { var T, let U } <Int, String> // A generic box layout,
// applied to Int and String
// arguments
Keep in mind that these are approximations that will not impact correctness
since in all cases I ensured that the SIL will be the same after the
OwnershipModelEliminator has run. The cases that I was unsure of I commented
with SEMANTIC ARC TODO. Once we have the verifier any confusion that may have
occurred here will be dealt with.
rdar://28685236
This ensures that ownership is properly propagated forward through the use-def
graph.
This was the work that was stymied by issues relating to SILBuilder performing
local ARC dataflow. I ripped out that local dataflow in 6f4e2ab and added a
cheap ARC guaranteed dataflow pass that performs the same optimization.
Also in the process of doing this work, I found that there were many SILGen
tests that were either pattern matching in the wrong functions or had wrong
CHECK lines (for instance CHECK_NEXT). I fixed all of these issues and also
expanded many of the tests so that they verify ownership. The only work I left
for a future PR is that there are certain places in tests where we are using the
projection from an original value, instead of a copy. I marked those with a
message SEMANTIC ARC TODO so that they are easy to find.
rdar://28685236
Previously, if a generic type had a stored property with
a generic type and an initializer expression, we would
emit the expression directly in the body of each designated
initializer.
This is a problem if the designated initializer is defined
within an extension (even in the same source file), because
extensions have a different set of generic parameters and
archetypes.
Also, we've had bugs in the past where emitting an
expression multiple times didn't work properly. While these
might currently all be fixed, this is a tricky case to test
and it would be best to avoid it.
Fix both problems by emitting the initializer expression
inside its own function at the SIL level, and call the
initializer function from each designated initializer.
I'm using the existing 'variable initializer' mangling for this;
it doesn't seem to be used for anything else right now.
Currently, the default memberwise initializer does not use
this, because the machinery for emitting it is somewhat
duplicated and separate from the initializer expressions in
user-defined constructors. I'll clean this up in an upcoming
patch.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-488>.
For long names this is easier to read and in most cases the omitted information can be seen in the actual SIL code.
With the option -Xllvm -sil-full-demangle the old behavior can be restored.
When the nearest implementation of a superclass's implementation of a
method is in the same module, eagerly emit a direct call to the method
instead of relying on the devirtualizer for these, since this is a very
lightweight check and can make -Onone builds faster.
