Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
Previously, when a pseudogeneric function returned a type parameter, it
was unowned. That resulted in invalid OSSA out of SILGen. Here, this
is fixed to use the @autoreleasing convention.
rdar://64375208
Types that have "value semantics" should not have lexical lifetimes.
Value types are not expected to have custom deinits. Are not expected to
expose unsafe interior pointers. And cannot have weak references because
they are structs. Therefore, deinitialization barriers are irrelevant.
rdar://107076869
Now that
- owned arguments don't get lexical borrow scopes from SILGen
- owned arguments get lexical moves during inlining unless the value
passed for that argument is already lexical
- guaranteed arguments don't get lexical borrow scopes during inlining
when the value passed for that argument is already lexical
tests involving owned argument emission from SILGen and inlining need to
be updated.
Previously we gave them the same SIL linkage as the method, then changed
the LLVM IR linkage to 'internal' (which is roughly equivalent to
SIL 'private') in IRGen.
This would crash in the SIL verifier if an @objc method was
'@_alwaysEmitIntoClient'. While such a combination of attributes is
silly since '@objc' methods are intrinsically part of the ABI, we
should not crash in this case.
The simplest fix is to just set the linkage to private at the SIL
level, avoiding the IRGen hack entirely.
When a method is called with fewer than two parameter lists,
transform it into a fully-applied call by wrapping it in a
closure.
Eg,
Foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }
foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }(self)
super.bar => { args... in super.bar(args...) }
With this change, SILGen only ever sees fully-applied calls,
which will allow ripping out some code.
This new way of doing curry thunks fixes a long-standing bug
where unbound references to protocol methods did not work.
This is because such a reference must open the existential
*inside* the closure, after 'self' has been applied, whereas
the old SILGen implementation of curry thunks really wanted
the type of the method reference to match the opened type of
the method.
A follow-up cleanup will remove the SILGen curry thunk
implementation.
Fixes rdar://21289579 and https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-75.
The same base value is necessary to invoke other accessors as part of the same access, but we would end up consuming it as part of materializing the base value for calls into nonmutating setters.
Fixes SR-8990 | rdar://problem/45274900.
This does not eliminate the entrypoints on SILBuilder yet. I want to do this in
two parts so that it is functionally easier to disentangle changing the APIs
above SILBuilder and changing the underlying instruction itself.
rdar://33440767
The SILGen testsuite consists of valid Swift code covering most language
features. We use these tests to verify that no unknown nodes are in the
file's libSyntax tree. That way we will (hopefully) catch any future
changes or additions to the language which are not implemented in
libSyntax.
I am going to leave in the infrastructure around this just in case. But there is
no reason to keep this in the tests themselves. I can always just revert this
and I don't think merge conflicts are likely due to previous work I did around
the tooling for this.
Otherwise, the plus_zero_* tests will have plus_zero_* as a module name, causing
massive FileCheck problems.
The reason why I am doing it with the main tests is so that I can use it when
syncing branches/etc.
radar://34222540
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
This replaces the '[volatile]' flag. Now, class_method and
super_method are only used for vtable dispatch.
The witness_method instruction is still overloaded for use
with both ObjC protocol requirements and Swift protocol
requirements; the next step is to make it only mean the
latter, also using objc_method for ObjC protocol calls.
This will let me treat self during delegating initialization as an lvalue and
thus be emitted later without a scope. Thus I can simplify delegating
initialization slightly and land my argument scoping work.
rdar://33358110
conversions that reverse an implicit conversion done to align
foreign declarations with their imported types.
For example, consider an Objective-C method that returns an NSString*:
- (nonnull NSString*) foo;
This will be imported into Swift as a method returning a String:
func foo() -> String
A call to this method will implicitly convert the result to String
behind the scenes. If the user then casts the result back to NSString*,
that would normally be compiled as an additional conversion. The
compiler cannot simply eliminate the conversion because that is not
necessarily semantically equivalent.
This peephole recognizes as-casts that immediately reverse a bridging
conversion as a special case and gives them special power to eliminate
both conversions. For example, 'foo() as NSString' will simply return
the original return value. In addition to call results, this also
applies to call arguments, property accesses, and subscript accesses.
I tried to do a more complex fix, but it will take more time than I have now.
This change at least ensures that we maintain correctness both in terms of the
super types and in terms of the semantic sil verifier.
rdar://31880847
This fixes a crash when referencing partially-applied methods
from @_inlineable functions.
Also, curry thunks for private methods do not need shared
linkage; private is sufficient.
In the case where we already have a guaranteed value, the borrow operation will
just return the guaranteed manage value. Thus it is ok to always just perform
the borrow unconditionally.
rdar://29791263
In 74d979f0ac, the policy was changed
so that only value type accessors are ever marked transparent, and
not class accessors.
This was intended to fix a bug where inlining an accessor of an
Objective-C-derived class across module boundaries caused a linker
failure because the accessor referenced a field offset variable,
which has hidden visibility.
However, this also caused a performance regression for Swift native
classes. Bring back the old behavior for Swift native classes in
non-resilient modules.
Fixes <rdar://problem/29884727>.
Textual SIL was sometimes ambiguous when SILDeclRefs were used, because the textual representation of SILDeclRefs was the same for functions that have the same name, but different signatures.
Textual SIL was sometimes ambiguous when SILDeclRefs were used, because the textual representation of SILDeclRefs was the same for functions that have the same name, but different signatures.
In SIL, the distinction between IUO and Optional is now lowered away, so there's no reason to emit any SIL at all when an IUO is converted to Optional formally in the AST. (Eventually this distinction ought to go away at the type system level too…) Memory promotion didn't understand initializations through unchecked_*_casts and would incorrectly flag them as improper captures, causing rdar://problem/26899492.
