A bug in `@objc @implementation` is causing incorrect `@_hasStorage` attributes to be printed into module interfaces. As an initial step towards fixing this, diagnose bad `@_hasStorage` attributes and treat them as computed properties so that these malformed interfaces don’t cause compiler crashes.
Partially fixes rdar://144811653.
We were previously checking the optional type,
which would never say that parens were needed.
Unwrap the type before checking, ensuring we
correctly handle e.g protocol compositions.
Custom attributes were not printed because they are marked
'UserInaccesible'.
* Make CustomAttr 'RejectByParser' instead of 'UserInaccessible'
* Remove special treatment for Result Builder attributes
* Load implicit modules in module/header interface gen requests
rdar://79927502
The `@exclusivity(unchecked)` attribute can be used on variables to selectively disable exclusivity checking.
For completeness, also the `@exclusivity(checked)` variant is supported: it turns on exclusivity checking for specific variables if exclusivity enforcement is disabled by the command line option.
This new attribute is a missing implementation part of SE-0176 (https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0176-enforce-exclusive-access-to-memory.md).
rdar://31121356
Extend the parsing of custom attributes to apply to types. Improve the
lookahead for the arguments so we don't arbitrarily consume the parameter
list of a function type as an attribute argument, or consume a tuple type
as the attribute argument.
Doesn't actually change behavior, because after parsing the custom
attribute on a type, we reject it as an unknown attribute.
This non-user-facing attribute is used to denote pointer parameters
which do not accept pointers produced from temporary pointer conversions
such as array-to-pointer, string-to-pointer, and in some cases
inout-to-pointer.
Some diagnostics got worse, but I think the reduction in compiler complexity
is worth it, and copy-and-pasting Swift 2 code is not likely to produce great
results anyway.
Also, this corrects an oversight where we did not reject @pseudogeneric on
function types in AST parsing.
Unlike weak values of optional type, an unowned or unowned(unsafe)
value of optional type will not silently become 'nil' when the
referenced instance goes away: rather, the program will trap. Don't
reject unowned or unowned(unsafe) optional lets.
Fixes rdar://problem/45732251.
Previously we only permitted it on the accessor itself, but there is
no reason not to allow it on the storage declaration.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3624> / <rdar://problem/31865137>.
By formalizing ReferenceOwnership as a diagnostic argument kind, we get
less boilerplate, better type safety, better output consistency, and
last but not least: future proofing.
When performing a binding/assignment to a weak or unowned variable/property from an initialiser call, emit a warning that the instance will be immediately deallocated.
For now these are underscored attributes, i.e. compiler internal attributes:
@_optimize(speed)
@_optimize(size)
@_optimize(none)
Those attributes override the command-line specified optimization mode for a specific function.
The @_optimize(none) attribute is equivalent to the already existing @_semantics("optimize.sil.never") attribute
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
This also removes some dead code, where an early assert() ensures that
'strong' is never passed into the function, but then the function later
tries to handle 'strong'.
Finally, use a switch statement for future proofing.
Quiz: What does @_transparent on an extension actually *do*?
1) Make all members @_transparent?
2) Allow your members to be @_transparent?
3) Some other magical effect that has nothing to do with members?
The correct answer is 1), however a few places in the stdlib defined
a @_transparent extension and then proceeded to make some or all members
also @_transparent, and in a couple of places we defined a @_transparent
extension with no members at all.
To avoid cargo culting and confusion, remove the ability to make
@_transparent extensions altogether, and force usages to be explicit.
By consuming parens.
As for type attributes, handle `@unknownAttribute(Arg) -> Ret` case.
Improves diagnostic QoI. For example, on:
func foo(x: @unknown(x) Int) {}
Before:
test.swift:1:14: error: unknown attribute 'unknown'
test.swift:1:25: error: expected ',' separator
test.swift:1:25: error: unnamed parameters must be written with the empty name '_'
test.swift:1:22: error: use of undeclared type 'x'
Now, we just emit the first one:
test.swift:1:14: error: unknown attribute 'unknown'
func foo(x: @unknown(x) Int) {}
^
When declaring a nominal type:
struct Weak<T> {
weak var value: T
}
The diagnostic might mislead the developer to adding ': class' literally
to the 'T' in the generic parameters for `Weak`:
"'weak' may not be applied to non-class-bound protocol 'T'; consider
adding a class bound"
This is misleading in two ways: 1, 'T' isn't necessarily a protocol
(this patch generalizes that part of the message) and 2, you can't put
`: class` in the generic parameter list for `Weak`. In addition, the
stray class constraint causes diagnostic spew that also hides the issue.
Also provide a fix-it to constrain with 'AnyObject', which is probably
what the devloper means in this case.
rdar://problem/25481209
At some point I want to propose a revised model for exports, but for now
just mark that support for '@exported' is still experimental and subject
to change. (Thanks, Max.)
