For now these are underscored attributes, i.e. compiler internal attributes:
@_optimize(speed)
@_optimize(size)
@_optimize(none)
Those attributes override the command-line specified optimization mode for a specific function.
The @_optimize(none) attribute is equivalent to the already existing @_semantics("optimize.sil.never") attribute
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
Inheritance of a protocol from JavaScriptCore's JSExport protocol is
used to indicate that the methods and properties of that protocol
should be exported to JavaScript. The actual check to determine
whether a protocol (directly) inherits JSExport is performed via the
Objective-C runtime. Note that the presence of JSExport in the
protocol hierarchy is not sufficient; the protocol must directly
inherit JSExport.
Swift warns about redundant conformance requirements and eliminates
them from the requirement signature (and, therefore, the Objective-C
metadata). This behavior is incorrect for JSExport, because the
conformance is actually needed for this API to work properly.
Recognize a protocol's inheritance JSExport specifically (by
name) when computing the requirement signature of the protocol. When
we find such a redundancy, suppress the "redundant conformance
constraint" diagnostic and add a new (hidden) attribute
@_restatedObjCConformance(proto). The attribute is used only by Objective-C
protocol metadata emission to ensure that we get the expected metadata
in the Objective-C runtime.
Fixes rdar://problem/32674145.
Using these in declaration position has been deprecated and
removed in Swift 3. These attributes were not being parsed and
contained deadweight diagnostics that should have been moved
when these attributes became type attributes.
This is accomplished by recognizing this specific situation and
replacing the 'objc' attribute with a hidden '_objcRuntimeName'
attribute. This /only/ applies to classes that are themselves
non-generic (including any enclosing generic context) but that have
generic ancestry, and thus cannot be exposed directly to Objective-C.
This commit also eliminates '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName'. It was
decided that the distinction between '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' and
'@objc' was too subtle to be worth explaining to developers, and that
any case where you'd use '@NSKeyedArchiverClassName' was already a
place where the ObjC name wasn't visible at compile time.
This commit does not update diagnostics to reflect this change; we're
going to change them anyway.
rdar://problem/32414557
Dispatch requests the ability to add a new case, but to treat missing
instances of that case in patterns as warnings instead of errors. It is
still an error to make reference to the annotated case in at least one
pattern then not cover the rest of the space, but it is not an error
to omit the space of patterns referencing the case entirely.
This attribute is private and uglified to intentionally discourage
its use outside just this one use case.
Currently inactive, this attribute indicates that a static initializer should be emitted to register the Objective-C metadata when the image is loaded, rather than on first use of the Objective-C metadata. Infer this attribute for NSCoding classes that won’t have static Objective-C metadata or have an @NSKeyedArchiveLegacy attributed.
This attribute allows one to provide the "legacy" name of a class for
the purposes of archival (via NSCoding). At the moment, it is only
useful for suppressing the warnings/errors about classes with unstable
archiving names.
When in Swift 3 compatibility mode without
`-warn-swift3-objc-inference`, warn on the *uses* of declarations that
depend on the Objective-C runtime that became `@objc` due to the
deprecated inference rule. This far more directly captures important
uses of the deprecated Objective-C entrypoints. We diagnose:
* `#selector` expressions that refer to one of these `@objc` members
* `#keyPath` expressions that refer to one of these `@objc` members
* Dynamic lookup (i.e., member access via `AnyObject`) that refers to
one of these `@objc` members.
Textual SIL containing something like: `infix static func ==(a: T, b: T) -> Bool` cannot be parsed and results in an error like:
```
error: 'infix' modifier is not required or allowed on func declarations
```
Interestingly enough, `prefix` and `postfix` attributes do not result in the same kind of errors.
UnconditionalAvailabilityKind => PlatformAgnosticAvailabilityKind
::UnavailableInCurrentSwift => ::SwiftVersionSpecific
Plus a couple related method renamings. Prep work for SR-2709.
I misled Argyrios into thinking we only had a wrapper for the name when
we also have one for the whole attribute. Fix that for @escaping and
@autoclosure.
rdar://problem/27867763
Flush out the ASTPrinter's ability to exclude and include specific
attributes to cover TypeAttrKinds and have code-completion use this to
print @escaping in override completions. Incidentally fix a case where
we weren't forwarding important options after type transformation, which
prevented printing @escaping in transformed parameter types.
rdar://problem/27772722
One minor revision: this lifts the proposed restriction against
overriding a non-open method with an open one. On reflection,
that was inconsistent with the existing rule permitting non-public
methods to be overridden with public ones. The restriction on
subclassing a non-open class with an open class remains, and is
in fact consistent with the existing access rule.
'fileprivate' is considered a broader level of access than 'private',
but for now both of them are still available to the entire file. This
is intended as a migration aid.
One interesting fallout of the "access scope" model described in
758cf64 is that something declared 'private' at file scope is actually
treated as 'fileprivate' for diagnostic purposes. This is something
we can fix later, once the full model is in place. (It's not really
/wrong/ in that they have identical behavior, but diagnostics still
shouldn't refer to a type explicitly declared 'private' as
'fileprivate'.)
As a note, ValueDecl::getEffectiveAccess will always return 'FilePrivate'
rather than 'Private'; for purposes of optimization and code generation,
we should never try to distinguish these two cases.
This should have essentially no effect on code that's /not/ using
'fileprivate' other than altered diagnostics.
Progress on SE-0025 ('fileprivate' and 'private')
This attribute is an implementation detail of how 'rethrows' works, and
you can't actually mark declarations @rethrows directly. So hide it
from cursor info, and other places that use the ASTPrinter.
rdar://problem/26638597
In C++ we can't have nice things. The macro name 'defer' collided with
use of 'defer' in the Tokens.def file and we were already doing horrible
workarounds in a couple of places to allow them to be included into the
same file. So use a less awesome but more robust name (thanks to Joe for
suggesting SWIFT_DEFER).
Incidentally, sort a bunch of #inlcudes.
When attempting to compile Swift 2 code (or any Swift code using the
Swift 2 names) in Swift 3, the compiler diagnostics are often entirely
useless because the names have changed radically enough that one
generally gets "no member named 'foo'" errors rather than a helpful
"'foo' was renamed to 'bar'" error. This makes for a very poor user
experience when (e.g.) trying to move Swift 2 code forward to Swift 3.
To improve the experience, when the Swift 2 and Swift 3 names of an
API differ, the Clang importer will produce a "stub" declaration that
matches the Swift 2 API. That stub will be marked with a synthesized
attribute
@available(unavailable, renamed: "the-swift-3-name")
that enables better diagnostics (e.g., "'foo' is unavailable: renamed
to 'bar') along with Fix-Its (courtesy of @jrose-apple's recent work)
that fix the Swift 2 code to compile in Swift 3.
This change addresses much of rdar://problem/25309323 (concerning QoI
of Swift 2 code compiled with a Swift 3 compiler), but some cleanup
remains.
This was mistakenly reverted in an attempt to fix buildbots.
Unfortunately it's now smashed into one commit.
---
Introduce @_specialize(<type list>) internal attribute.
This attribute can be attached to generic functions. The attribute's
arguments must be a list of concrete types to be substituted in the
function's generic signature. Any number of specializations may be
associated with a generic function.
This attribute provides a hint to the compiler. At -O, the compiler
will generate the specified specializations and emit calls to the
specialized code in the original generic function guarded by type
checks.
The current attribute is designed to be an internal tool for
performance experimentation. It does not affect the language or
API. This work may be extended in the future to add user-visible
attributes that do provide API guarantees and/or direct dispatch to
specialized code.
This attribute works on any generic function: a freestanding function
with generic type parameters, a nongeneric method declared in a
generic class, a generic method in a nongeneric class or a generic
method in a generic class. A function's generic signature is a
concatenation of the generic context and the function's own generic
type parameters.
e.g.
struct S<T> {
var x: T
@_specialize(Int, Float)
mutating func exchangeSecond<U>(u: U, _ t: T) -> (U, T) {
x = t
return (u, x)
}
}
// Substitutes: <T, U> with <Int, Float> producing:
// S<Int>::exchangeSecond<Float>(u: Float, t: Int) -> (Float, Int)
---
[SILOptimizer] Introduce an eager-specializer pass.
This pass finds generic functions with @_specialized attributes and
generates specialized code for the attribute's concrete types. It
inserts type checks and guarded dispatch at the beginning of the
generic function for each specialization. Since we don't currently
expose this attribute as API and don't specialize vtables and witness
tables yet, the only way to reach the specialized code is by calling
the generic function which performs the guarded dispatch.
In the future, we can build on this work in several ways:
- cross module dispatch directly to specialized code
- dynamic dispatch directly to specialized code
- automated specialization based on less specific hints
- partial specialization
- and so on...
I reorganized and refactored the optimizer's generic utilities to
support direct function specialization as opposed to apply
specialization.
Temporarily reverting @_specialize because stdlib unit tests are
failing on an internal branch during deserialization.
This reverts commit e2c43cfe14, reversing
changes made to 9078011f93.
This attribute can be attached to generic functions. The attribute's
arguments must be a list of concrete types to be substituted in the
function's generic signature. Any number of specializations may be
associated with a generic function.
This attribute provides a hint to the compiler. At -O, the compiler
will generate the specified specializations and emit calls to the
specialized code in the original generic function guarded by type
checks.
The current attribute is designed to be an internal tool for
performance experimentation. It does not affect the language or
API. This work may be extended in the future to add user-visible
attributes that do provide API guarantees and/or direct dispatch to
specialized code.
This attribute works on any generic function: a freestanding function
with generic type parameters, a nongeneric method declared in a
generic class, a generic method in a nongeneric class or a generic
method in a generic class. A function's generic signature is a
concatenation of the generic context and the function's own generic
type parameters.
e.g.
struct S<T> {
var x: T
@_specialize(Int, Float)
mutating func exchangeSecond<U>(u: U, _ t: T) -> (U, T) {
x = t
return (u, x)
}
}
// Substitutes: <T, U> with <Int, Float> producing:
// S<Int>::exchangeSecond<Float>(u: Float, t: Int) -> (Float, Int)
There's an immediate need for this in the core libs, and we have most of the necessary pieces on hand to make it easy to implement. This is an unpolished initial implementation, with the following limitations, among others:
- It doesn't support bridging error conventions,
- It relies on ObjC interop,
- It doesn't check for symbol name collisions,
- It has an underscored name with required symbol name `@cdecl("symbol_name")`, awaiting official bikeshed painting.
As a first foray into annotating attribute, add tags around attribute
names. For now, treat any decl-modifiers as keywords. We will also want
to wrap the whole attribute (including any parameters) into tags as
well, but that will require more work in the callback hanlding.
Also factor the attribute printing to handle any special cases early,
which will simplify wrapping attributes in tags, since we can then just
put the whole switch intside the pre/post callbacks.
rdar://problem/24292226
This class formalizes the common case of the "trailing allocation" idiom we use
frequently. I didn't spot any true bugs while making this change, but I did see
places where we were using the wrong pointer type or casting through void* for
no good reason. This will keep us honest.
I'll get to the other libraries soon.
Introduce a new attribute, swift3_migration, that lets us describe the
transformation required to map a Swift 2.x API into its Swift 3
equivalent. The only transformation understood now is "renamed" (to
some other declaration name), but there's a message field where we can
record information about other changes. The attribute can grow
somewhat (e.g., to represent parameter reordering) as we need it.
Right now, we do nothing but store and validate this attribute.
