This avoids the potential to race with the triggering coming from
task_cancel, because we first set the cancelled flag, and only THEN
take the lock and iterate over the inserted records. Because of this we
could: T1 flip the cancelled bit; T2 observes that, and triggers
"immediately" during installing the handler record. T1 then proceeds to
lock records and trigger it again, causing a double trigger of the
cancellation handler.
resolves https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/80161
resolves rdar://147493150
Remove Malloc Type Descriptor cache and trivialize
`computeMallocTypeSummary()` to only provide
language. The remaining info in
`malloc_type_summary_t` are currently not used by
the allocator.
The principled, long-term solution is to have the
Swift compiler compute type descriptors for Swift
types.
rdar://137993434
This caused a hard-to-reproduce bug where a machine that had slept for
a long time would take a very long time to run some of the tests because
we'd be scheduling Dispatch executions with the wrong clock.
rdar://148337712
* [Swiftify] Emit Mutable[Raw]Span when possible
Previously wrappers would use UnsafeMutable[Raw]Pointer for mutable
pointers, and Span for non-const std::span, to prevent the compiler from
complaining that MutableSpan didn't exist.
Now that MutableSpan has landed we can finally emit MutableSpan without
causing compilation errors. While we had (disabled) support for MutableSpan
syntax already, some unexpected semantic errors required additional
changes:
- Mutable[Raw]Span parameters need to be inout (for mutation)
- inout ~Escapable paramters need explicit lifetime annotations
- MutableSpan cannot be directly bitcast to std::span, because it is
~Copyable, so they need unwrapping to UnsafeMutableBufferPointer
rdar://147883022
* [Swiftify] Wrap if-expressions in Immediately Called Closures
When parameters in swiftified wrapper functions are nullable, we use
separate branches for the nil and nonnil cases, because
`withUnsafeBufferPointer` (and similar) cannot be called on nil.
If-expressions have some limitations on where they are allowed in the
grammar, and cannot be passed as arguments to a function. As such, when
the return value is also swiftified, we get an error when trying to
pass the if-expression to the UnsafeBufferPointer/Span constructor.
While it isn't pretty, the best way forward seems to be by wrapping the
if-expressions in Immediately Called Closures.
The closures have the side-effect of acting as a barrier for 'unsafe':
unsafe keywords outside the closure do not "reach" unsafe expressions
inside the closure. We therefore have to emit "unsafe" where unsafe
expressions are used, rather than just when returning.
rdar://148153063
This feature only exists as a mechanism to suppress the warning introduced in
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/75378. The RegexParser module, which is
effectively part of the standard library, declares a Swift runtime symbol and
as a result every build of the compiler and stdlib produces warnings which
there are no plans to address. Warnings that are not going to be addressed need
some way of being suppressed, and an experimental features seems like a
reasonable mechanism for this one.
Tweaked diagnostic to use a string instead of a type. Renamed the
feature in `FeatureAvailability.def` (and added the `TaskExecutor`
feature to 6.2). Also fixed the `swift_getActiveExecutor()`
function to return the main executor only when on the main thread.
rdar://141348916
