Otherwise, when one diagnoses code like the following:
```
Task {
{
use($0)
}(x)
}
```
One gets that $0 was captured instead of x. Unfortunately, since function
parameters do not have locations associated with them, we do not mark x
itself... instead, we mark the closure... which is unfortunate.
The reason why I am doing this is that in certain cases the AST captures indices
will never actually line up with partial apply capture indices since we seem to
"smush" together closures and locally defined functions.
NOTE: The reason for the really small amount of test changes is that this change
does not change the actual output by design. The only cases I had to change were
a case where we began to emit a better diagnostic and also where I added code
coverage around _ and let _ since those require ignored_use to be implemented so
that they would be diagnosed (previously we just did not emit anything so we
couldn't emit the diagnostic at the SIL level).
rdar://142661388
Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
Instead, use the `%target-swift-5.1-abi-triple` substitution to compile the tests
for deployment to the minimum OS versions required for use of _Concurrency APIs.
This only occurs specifically for async nonisolated functions with an isolated
parameter that passes a disconnected value in its body off to a nonisolated
async function as a sending parameter.
rdar://134409359
Specifically:
I changed the main error message to focus on the closure and that the closure
is being accessed concurrently.
If we find that we captured a value that is the actual isolation source, we
emit that the capture is actually actor isolated.
If the captured value is in the same region as the isolated value but is not
isolated, we instead say that the value is accessible from *-isolated code or
code within the current task.
If we find multiple captures and we do not which is the actual value that was
in the same region before we formed the partial apply, we just emit a note on
the captures saying that the closure captures the value.
I changed the diagnostics from using the phrase "task-isolated" to use some
variant of accessible to code in the current task.
The idea is that in all situations we provide a breadcrumb that the user can
start investigating rather than just saying that the closure is "task-isolated".
From a preconcurrency perspective, I made it so that we apply the preconcurrency
behavior of all of the captures. This means that if one of the captures is
preconcurrency, we apply the preconcurrency restriction to the closure. This is
one step towards making it so that preconcurrency applies at the region level...
we just are not completely there yet.
rdar://133798044
Specifically:
1. We error now if one transfers an 'inout sending' parameter and does not
reinitialize it before the end of the function.
2. We error now if one merges an 'inout sending' parameter into an actor
isolated region and do not reinitialize it with a non-actor isolated value
before the end of the function.
rdar://126303739
The reason why I am doing this is that:
1. We don't support no escaping closure parameters today and would like
to leave the design space open.
2. These closures are bitwise copyable/trivial so marking them as
specifically consuming doesn't really make sense.
applying `@Sendable` inference for global-actor-isolated function types.
Otherwise, for libraries that do not enable `GlobalActorIsolatedTypesUsability`,
clients that do will encounter mangling mismatches for any library APIs that
have global-actor-isolated function types that are not explicitly `@Sendable`.
TLDR: This makes it so that we always can parse sending/transferring but changes
the semantic language effects to be keyed on RegionBasedIsolation instead.
----
The key thing that makes this all work is that I changed all of the "special"
semantic changes originally triggered on *ArgsAndResults to now be triggered
based on RegionBasedIsolation being enabled. This makes a lot of sense since we
want these semantic changes specifically to be combined with the checkers that
RegionBasedIsolation turns on. As a result, even though this causes these two
features to always be enabled, we just parse it but we do not use it for
anything semantically.
rdar://128961672
This fixes a few issues I missed in the past bit of commits.
I need to fix one issue around async let, but I am going to fix it when I do a
sweep across async let.
