Find all the usages of `--enable-experimental-feature` or
`--enable-upcoming-feature` in the tests and replace some of the
`REQUIRES: asserts` to use `REQUIRES: swift-feature-Foo` instead, which
should correctly apply to depending on the asserts/noasserts mode of the
toolchain for each feature.
Remove some comments that talked about enabling asserts since they don't
apply anymore (but I might had miss some).
All this was done with an automated script, so some formatting weirdness
might happen, but I hope I fixed most of those.
There might be some tests that were `REQUIRES: asserts` that might run
in `noasserts` toolchains now. This will normally be because their
feature went from experimental to upcoming/base and the tests were not
updated.
The model for associated types hasn't been fully worked-out for
noncopyable generics, but there is some support already that is being
used by the stdlib for an internal-only (and rather cursed) protocol
`_Pointer` to support `UnsafePointer`, etc.
This patch gates the existing experimental support for associated types
behind a feature flag. This flag doesn't emit feature-guards in
interfaces, since support for it is tied closely to NoncopyableGenerics
and has been there from its early days.
These tests were not updated in the transition to
`REQUIRES: noncopyable_generics` and thus running them with a
correctly-built stdlib that has the Copyable requirements.
We want extensions to introduce default Copyable/Escapable just like
other generic contexts, so that once Optional adopts ~Copyable,
an `extension Optional` actually adds `Wrapped: Copyable` by default.
Follow the feature flag convention for capitalization and be
consistent with the related NoncopyableGenerics feature.
This is a new feature that no wild Swift code has used it yet:
commit e99ce1cc5d
Author: Kavon Farvardin <kfarvardin@apple.com>
Date: Tue Dec 5 23:25:09 2023
[NCGenerics] add `~Escapable`
Basic implementation of `~Escapable` in the type system.
We already need to track the inverses separate from the members in a
ProtocolCompositionType, since inverses aren't real types. Thus, the
only purpose being served by InverseType is to be eliminated by
RequirementLowering when it appears in a conformance requirement.
Instead, we introduce separate type InverseRequirement just to keep
track of which inverses we encounter to facilitate cancelling-out
defaults and ensuring that the inverses are respected after running
the RequirementMachine.
This implementation has the function execute a request to scan the
inheritance clause of non-protocol nominals for a `~Copyable`. For
protocols, we look in the requirement signature.
This isn't our final state, as the GenericEnvironment needs to be
queried in general to determine of a Type is noncopyable. So for now
checking for a `~Copyable` only makes sense for Decls.
