Because actors don't have inheritance, ban "open" and "required", which
don't make sense. We will permit "final" which, although it doesn't
have any semantic impact, is still used to determine whether the ABI
of the actor itself might permit subclassing in the future. This
leaves the door slightly ajar for actor inheritance should we need to
revisit that decision.
Fixes SR-14785 / rdar://79401150.
Actor inheritance was removed in the second revision of SE-0306. Remove
the ability to inherit actors.
Note that this doesn't fully eliminate all vestigates of inheritance
from actors. There are simplifications that need to be performed
still, e.g., there's no need to distinguish
designated/convenience/required initializers. That will follow.
Repurpose mangling operator `Y` as an umbrella operator that covers new attributes on function types. Free up operators `J`, `j`, and `k`.
```
async ::= 'Ya' // 'async' annotation on function types
sendable ::= 'Yb' // @Sendable on function types
throws ::= 'K' // 'throws' annotation on function types
differentiable ::= 'Yjf' // @differentiable(_forward) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjr' // @differentiable(reverse) on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjd' // @differentiable on function type
differentiable ::= 'Yjl' // @differentiable(_linear) on function type
```
Resolves rdar://76299796.
Most of the async runtime functions have been changed to not
expect the task and executor to be passed in. When knowing the
task and executor is necessary, there are runtime functions
available to recover them.
The biggest change I had to make to a runtime function signature
was to swift_task_switch, which has been altered to expect to be
passed the context and resumption function instead of requiring
the caller to park the task. This has the pleasant consequence
of allowing the implementation to very quickly turn around when
it recognizes that the current executor is satisfactory. It does
mean that on arm64e we have to sign the continuation function
pointer as an argument and then potentially resign it when
assigning into the task's resume slot.
rdar://70546948
This is conditional on UseAsyncLowering and in the future should also be
conditional on `clangTargetInfo.isSwiftAsyncCCSupported()` once that
support is merged.
Update tests to work either with swiftcc or swifttailcc.
This adds new kinds of link entities corresponding to the three
dispatch thunk link entity kinds:
- DispatchThunkAsyncFunctionPointer
- DispatchThunkInitializerAsyncFunctionPointer
- DispatchThunkAllocatorAsyncFunctionPointer
Previously, the "bare" linkage of a link entity was used to determine
whether to put an async function pointer into the tbd. That did not
match the mechanism by which the linkage was determined in IRGen.
There, the linkage is the "_effective_" linkage (i.e. the value returned
from SILFunction::getEffectiveSymbolLinkage).
Here, whether to put the async function pointer corresponding to a class
method is determined on the basis of that effective linkage.
rdar://problem/73203508
Previously, when looking up a protocol method, the witness table was
always exepcted to be the final argument passed to the function.
That is true for sync protocol witnesses but not for async witnesses.
In the async case, the witness table is embedded in the async context.
Here, the witness table is dug out of the async context.
rdar://problem/71491604
Metadata for an instance of a type is resolved by extracting it from an
instance of the class. When doing method lookup for an instance method
of a resilient class, the lowered self value was being obtained from the
list of arguments directly by indexing. That does not apply to async
functions where self is embedded within the async context. Here, the
self parameter is extracted from the async context so that the metadata
can in turn be extracted from it.
rdar://problem/71260862
