I was originally hoping to reuse mark_must_check for multiple types of checkers.
In practice, this is not what happened... so giving it a name specifically to do
with non copyable types makes more sense and makes the code clearer.
Just a pure rename.
These are the same semantically, just the mangling is slightly different. The
benefit of doing this is that we are actually testing what we expect our users
to do.
rdar://108511703
the main things still left behind the experimental flag(s) are
- move-only classes (guarded by MoveOnlyClasses feature)
- noimplicitcopy
- the _borrow operator
Consider the following example:
```
class Klass {}
@_moveOnly struct Butt {
var k = Klass()
}
func mixedUse(_: inout Butt, _: __owned Butt) {}
func foo() {
var y = Butt()
mixedUse(&y, y)
}
```
In this case, we want to have an exclusivity violation. Before this patch, we
did a by-value load [copy] of y and then performed the inout access. Since the
access scopes did not overlap, we would not get an exclusivity violation.
Additionally, since the checker assumes that exclusivity violations will be
caught in such a situation, we convert the load [copy] to a load [take] causing
a later memory lifetime violation as seen in the following SIL:
```
sil hidden [ossa] @$s4test3fooyyF : $@convention(thin) () -> () {
bb0:
%0 = alloc_stack [lexical] $Butt, var, name "y" // users: %4, %5, %8, %12, %13
%1 = metatype $@thin Butt.Type // user: %3
// function_ref Butt.init()
%2 = function_ref @$s4test4ButtVACycfC : $@convention(method) (@thin Butt.Type) -> @owned Butt // user: %3
%3 = apply %2(%1) : $@convention(method) (@thin Butt.Type) -> @owned Butt // user: %4
store %3 to [init] %0 : $*Butt // id: %4
%5 = begin_access [modify] [static] %0 : $*Butt // users: %7, %6
%6 = load [take] %5 : $*Butt // user: %10 // <————————— This was a load [copy].
end_access %5 : $*Butt // id: %7
%8 = begin_access [modify] [static] %0 : $*Butt // users: %11, %10
// function_ref mixedUse2(_:_:)
%9 = function_ref @$s4test9mixedUse2yyAA4ButtVz_ADntF : $@convention(thin) (@inout Butt, @owned Butt) -> () // user: %10
%10 = apply %9(%8, %6) : $@convention(thin) (@inout Butt, @owned Butt) -> ()
end_access %8 : $*Butt // id: %11
destroy_addr %0 : $*Butt // id: %12
dealloc_stack %0 : $*Butt // id: %13
%14 = tuple () // user: %15
return %14 : $() // id: %15
} // end sil function '$s4test3fooyyF'
```
Now, instead we create a [consume] access and get the nice exclusivity error we
are looking for.
NOTE: As part of this I needed to tweak the verifier so that [deinit] accesses
are now allowed to have any form of access enforcement before we are in
LoweredSIL. I left in the original verifier error in LoweredSIL and additionally
left in the original error in IRGen. The reason why I am doing this is that I
need the deinit access to represent semantically what consuming from a
ref_element_addr, global, or escaping mutable var look like at the SIL level so
that the move checker can error upon it. Since we will error upon such
consumptions in Canonical SIL, such code patterns will never actually hit
Lowered/IRGen SIL, so it is safe to do so (and the verifier/errors will help us
if we make any mistakes). In the case of a non-escaping var though, we will be
able to use deinit statically and the move checker will make sure that it is not
reused before it is reinitialized.
rdar://101767439
