Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
I also removed the -verify-sil-ownership flag in favor of a disable flag
-disable-sil-ownership-verifier. I used this on only two tests that still need
work to get them to pass with ownership, but whose problems are well understood,
small corner cases. I am going to fix them in follow on commits. I detail them
below:
1. SILOptimizer/definite_init_inout_super_init.swift. This is a test case where
DI is supposed to error. The only problem is that we crash before we error since
the code emitting by SILGen to trigger this error does not pass ownership
invariants. I have spoken with JoeG about this and he suggested that I fix this
earlier in the compiler. Since we do not run the ownership verifier without
asserts enabled, this should not affect compiler users. Given that it has
triggered DI errors previously I think it is safe to disable ownership here.
2. PrintAsObjC/extensions.swift. In this case, the signature generated by type
lowering for one of the thunks here uses an unsafe +0 return value instead of
doing an autorelease return. The ownership checker rightly flags this leak. This
is going to require either an AST level change or a change to TypeLowering. I
think it is safe to turn this off since it is such a corner case that it was
found by a test that has nothing to do with it.
rdar://43398898
I have been meaning to do this change for a minute, but kept on putting it off.
This describes what is actually happening and is a better name for the option.
If the derived class is final and the base class is not, the
protocol requirement can be witnessed by a non-required
initializer. Non-required initializers have initializing
but not allocating entry points in the vtable.
The fix here statically dispatches to the allocating
initializer instead. The test verifies that the allocating
entry point uses alloc_ref_dynamic, so you will get an
instance of the correct subclass.
This fix does not handle the resilient case where the
conformance is defined in a different module, and the original
module adds an override of the convenience init later.
I filed <rdar://problem/40639124> to track the resilient case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/40003840>.
The SILGen testsuite consists of valid Swift code covering most language
features. We use these tests to verify that no unknown nodes are in the
file's libSyntax tree. That way we will (hopefully) catch any future
changes or additions to the language which are not implemented in
libSyntax.
We used to give witness thunks public linkage if the
conforming type and the protocol are public.
This is completely unnecessary. If the conformance is
fragile, the thunk should be [shared] [serialized],
allowing the thunk to be serialized into callers after
devirtualization.
Otherwise for private protocols or resilient modules,
witness thunks can just always be private.
This should reduce the size of compiled binaries.
There are two other mildly interesting consequences:
1) In the bridged cast tests, we now inline the witness
thunks from the bridgeable conformances, which removes
one level of indirection.
2) This uncovered a flaw in our accessibility checking
model. Usually, we reject a witness that is less
visible than the protocol; however, we fail to
reject it in the case that it comes from an
extension.
This is because members of an extension can be
declared 'public' even if the extended type is not
public, and it appears that in this case the 'public'
keyword has no effect.
I would prefer it if a) 'public' generated a warning
here, and b) the conformance also generated a warning.
In Swift 4 mode, we could then make this kind of
sillyness into an error. But for now, live with the
broken behavior, and add a test to exercise it to ensure
we don't crash.
There are other places where this "allow public but
ignore it, kinda, except respect it in some places"
behavior causes problems. I don't know if it was intentional
or just emergent behavior from general messiness in Sema.
3) In the TBD code, there is one less 'failure' because now
that witness thunks are no longer public, TBDGen does not
need to reason about them (except for the case #2 above,
which will probably require a similar workaround in TBDGen
as what I put into SILGen).
