Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
This adds a mostly flow-insensitive analysis that runs before the
dominator-based transformations. The analysis is simple and efficient
because it only needs to track data flow of currently in-scope
accesses. The original dominator tree walk remains simple, but it now
checks the flow insensitive analysis information to determine general
correctness. This is now correct in the presence of all kinds of nested
static and dynamic nested accesses, call sites, coroutines, etc.
This is a better compromise than:
(a) disabling the pass and taking a major performance loss.
(b) converting the pass itself to full-fledged data flow driven
optimization, which would be more optimal because it could remove
accesses when nesting is involved, but would be much more expensive
and complicated, and there's no indication that it's useful.
The new approach is also simpler than adding more complexity to
independently handle to each of many issues:
- Nested reads followed by a modify without a false conflict.
- Reads nested within a function call without a false conflict.
- Conflicts nested within a function call without dropping enforcement.
- Accesses within a generalized accessor.
- Conservative treatment of invalid storage locations.
- Conservative treatment of unknown apply callee.
- General analysis invalidation.
Some of these issues also needed to be considered in the
LoopDominatingAccess sub-pass. Rather than fix that sub-pass, I just
integrated it into the main pass. This is a simplification, is more
efficient, and also handles nested loops without creating more
redundant accesses. It is also generalized to:
- hoist non-uniquely identified accesses.
- Avoid unnecessarily promoting accesses inside the loop.
With this approach we can remove the scary warnings and caveats in the
comments.
While doing this I also took the opportunity to eliminate quadratic
behavior, make the domtree walk non-recursive, and eliminate cutoff
thresholds.
Note that simple nested dynamic reads to identical storage could very
easily be removed via separate logic, but it does not fit with the
dominator-based algorithm. For example, during the analysis phase, we
could simply mark the "fully nested" read scopes, then convert them to
[static] right after the analysis, removing them from the result
map. I didn't do this because I don't know if it happens in practice.
