Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.
```
%3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```
Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.
But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:
* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located
* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger
The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
a closure expression, then don't actually do it. The long term plan is
to actually do this, which should just be a matter of taking some of the
code out of reabstraction thunk emission and using it in prolog/epilog/return
emission. In the short term, the goal is just to get the conversion
information down to the closure emitter so that we can see that we're
erasing into an `@isolated(any)` type and then actually erase the
closure's isolation properly instead of relying on type-based erasure,
which can't handle parameter/capture isolation correctly.
Although nonescaping closures are representationally trivial pointers to their
on-stack context, it is useful to model them as borrowing their captures, which
allows for checking correct use of move-only values across the closure, and
lets us model the lifetime dependence between a closure and its captures without
an ad-hoc web of `mark_dependence` instructions.
During ownership elimination, We eliminate copy/destroy_value instructions and
end the partial_apply's lifetime with an explicit dealloc_stack as before,
for compatibility with existing IRGen and non-OSSA aware passes.
Sometimes we emit a closure literal with escaping/nonthrowing/nonasync type
into a context that wants a nonescaping/throwing/async function, and it
ends up wrapped in a conversion. We can look through any of these and emit
the closure literal directly with those effects.
Replaced the -disable-copy-propagation flag with
-enable-copy-propagation=false where the latter is a new multi-var
-enable-copy-propagation= which can take one of three values:
- true
- requested-passes-only
- false
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
Literal closures are only ever directly referenced in the context of the expression they're written in,
so it's wasteful to emit them at their fully-substituted calling convention and then reabstract them if
they're passed directly to a generic function. Avoid this by saving the abstraction pattern of the context
before emitting the closure, and then lowering its main entry point's calling convention at that
level of abstraction. Generalize some of the prolog/epilog code to handle converting arguments and returns
to the correct representation for a different abstraction level.
When the closure of startAsyncLet is no-escaping, the captured values (= the partial_apply arguments) must be kept alive until the endAsyncLet builtin.
ClosureLifetimeFixup adds the generated mark_dependence as a second operand to endAsyncLet, which keeps all the arguments alive until this point.
When a method is called with fewer than two parameter lists,
transform it into a fully-applied call by wrapping it in a
closure.
Eg,
Foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }
foo.bar => { self in { args... self.bar(args...) } }(self)
super.bar => { args... in super.bar(args...) }
With this change, SILGen only ever sees fully-applied calls,
which will allow ripping out some code.
This new way of doing curry thunks fixes a long-standing bug
where unbound references to protocol methods did not work.
This is because such a reference must open the existential
*inside* the closure, after 'self' has been applied, whereas
the old SILGen implementation of curry thunks really wanted
the type of the method reference to match the opened type of
the method.
A follow-up cleanup will remove the SILGen curry thunk
implementation.
Fixes rdar://21289579 and https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-75.
This just eliminates -enable-sil-ownership from all target-swift-frontend and
target-swift-emit-silgen RUN lines. Both of those now include
enable-sil-ownership in their expansion.
This beyond being slightly cleaner ensures that we do not try to promote in
PredictableMemOpts any loads from the alloc_stack. Doing this would force us to
insert a copy in ossa which then would break is_escaping_closure even when we
don't escape.
rdar://problem/46188001
In this commit I added a more convenient API for doing this sort of operation.
Specifically: SILBuilder::emitScopedBorrowOperation. This performs either a
load_borrow or begin_borrow, then calls a user provided closure, and finally
inserts the end_borrow after the scope has closed.
rdar://43398898
Most of this patch is just removing special cases for materializeForSet
or other fairly mechanical replacements. Unfortunately, the rest is
still a fairly big change, and not one that can be easily split apart
because of the quite reasonable reliance on metaprogramming throughout
the compiler. And, of course, there are a bunch of test updates that
have to be sync'ed with the actual change to code-generation.
This is SR-7134.
