Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik Eckstein
7cceaff5f3 SIL: don't print operand types in textual SIL
Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.

```
  %3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```

Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.

But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:

* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located

* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger

The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
2024-11-21 18:49:52 +01:00
Emil Pedersen
b2930992a8 [DebugInfo] Remove Expr from debug variables used as DenseMap keys
We do keep the fragment part of the expression as it is important
to identify fragments separately.

A variable with less fragments should be considered a superset of
variables with more fragments, but that would require to change a
lot of code.
2024-05-10 16:09:26 -07:00
Anton Korobeynikov
d84847ac9d Reland Allow normal function results of @yield_once coroutines (#71645)
* Allow normal function results of @yield_once coroutines

* Address review comments

* Workaround LLVM coroutine codegen problem: it assumes that unwind path never returns.
This is not true to Swift coroutines as unwind path should end with error result.
2024-03-27 13:09:02 -07:00
Nate Cook
e317febc9d Revert "Allow normal function results of @yield_once coroutines (#69843)"
This reverts commit aa5b505014.
2024-02-07 14:57:31 -06:00
Anton Korobeynikov
aa5b505014 Allow normal function results of @yield_once coroutines (#69843)
This adds SIL-level support and LLVM codegen for normal results of a coroutine.

The main user of this will be autodiff as VJP of a coroutine must be a coroutine itself (in order to produce the yielded result) and return a pullback closure as a normal result.

For now only direct results are supported, but this seems to be enough for autodiff purposes.
2024-02-06 22:13:15 -08:00
Michael Gottesman
4a309575d7 [sil] Rename [moved] flag on debug_value/alloc_stack to moveable_value_debuginfo.
This is in preparation for wiring up debug info support for noncopyable
values. Originally this flag name made sense since it was set when we performed
consume operator checking. Now I am going to use it for noncopyable types as
well. I think the new name uses_moveable_value_debuginfo actually describes what
the flag is supposed to do, tell IRGen that the value may be moved since it
needs to use moveable value debug info emission.
2023-03-19 15:38:42 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
50a0b91560 [move-function] Propagate debug_value undef rather than treat it as an invalidation.
The reason that I am doing this is that otherwise in funclets we may show an
invalidated value being available if we have an llvm.dbg.addr for a reinit value
later in the funclet. This ensures that we have the undef at the beginning of
the funclet so before that llvm.dbg.addr we will properly show no value.
2022-03-21 14:20:53 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
056132cca0 [move-function] Add a new pass that propagates debug_value [moved] into coroutine func-lets.
NOTE: debug_value [moved] appearing in the source code implies a _move was
used. So this will not effect current stable swift code.

This is just a first version of this that I am using to commit/bring up tests
for IRGen supporting a full dataflow version of this patch.

Big picture is that there is a bunch of work that is done in the LLVM level in
the coroutine splitter to work around communicating live variables in the
various coroutine func-lets. This logic is all done with debug.declare and we
would need to update that logic in the coroutine splitter to handle
debug.addr. Rather than do this, after some conversation, AdrianP and I realized
that we could get the same effect of a debug.declare by just redeclaring the
current live set of debug_value after each possible coroutine funclet start. To
do this in full generality, we need a full dataflow but just to bring this up we
initially perform a dominance propagation algorithm of the following sort:

1. We walk the CFG along successors. By doing this we guarantee that we visit
   blocks after their dominators.

2. When we visit a block, we walk the block from start->end. During this walk:

   a. We grab a new block state from the centralized block->blockState map. This
      state is a [SILDebugVariable : DebugValueInst].

   b. If we see a debug_value, we map blockState[debug_value.getDbgVar()] =
      debug_value. This ensures that when we get to the bottom of the block, we
      have pairs of SILDebugVariable + last debug_value on it.

   c. If we see any coroutine funclet boundaries, we clone the current tracked
      set of our block state and then walk up the dom tree dumping in each block
      any debug_value with a SILDebugVariable that we have not already
      dumped. This is maintained by using a visited set of SILDebugVariable for
      each funclet boundary.

The end result is that at the beginning of each funclet we will basically
declare the debug info for an addr.

This is insufficient of course for moves that are in conditional control flow,
e.x.:

```
let x = Klass()
if boolValue {
  await asyncCall()
  let _ = _move(x)
}
```

but this at least lets me begin to write tests for this in lldb using straight
line code and work out the rest of the issues in CodeGen using those tests.
2022-03-21 14:20:06 -07:00