Add the list of symbols from the swift-5.0 release and only use that symbols to refer to pre-specializations in a Onone build.
This ensures that future Onone executables can link to an old swift 5.0 libswiftSwiftOnoneSupport library.
rdar://problem/48924409
* Make Range conditionally a Collection
* Convert ClosedRange to conditionally a collection
* De-gyb Range/ClosedRange, refactoring some methods.
* Remove use of Countable{Closed}Range from stdlib
* Remove Countable use from Foundation
* Fix test errors and warnings resulting from Range/CountableRange collapse
* fix prespecialize test for new mangling
* Update CoreAudio use of CountableRange
* Update SwiftSyntax use of CountableRange
* Restore ClosedRange.Index: Hashable conformance
* Move fixed typechecker slowness test for array-of-ranges from slow to fast, yay
* Apply Doug's patch to loosen test to just check for error
Rather than mangling the complete generic signature of a constrained
extension, only mangle the requirements not already satisfied by the
nominal type. For example, given:
extension Dictionary where Value: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s8HashableRzs9EquatableR_r0_lE3baryyF
// NEW: _T0s10DictionaryV2t3s9EquatableR_rlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
In the existing mangling, we mangle the `Key: Hashable` requirement that’s
part of the generic signature. With this change, we only mangle the new
requirement (`Value: Equatable`).
This is a win for constrained extensions *except* in the case of a
constrained extension of a nominal type with a single, unconstrained
generic parameter:
extension Array where Element: Equatable {
// OLD: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzlE3baryyF
// NEW would be: _T0Sa2t3s9EquatableRzrlE3baryyF
public func bar() { }
}
Check explicily for this shortcut mangling and fall back to the old
path, so this change is a strict improvement.
This reverts commit 1b3d29a163, reversing
changes made to b32424953e.
We're seeing a handful of issues from turning on inlining of generics,
so I'm reverting to unblock the bots.
All unoptimized tests should now pass when Swift is built with
'build-script -- --swift-stdlib-enable-resilience=1'.
There are still some issues when the tests themselves are built
with optimizations via 'check-swift-validation-optimize'.
Fixes <rdar://problem/28409189>.
Don't include all the dependent types, which are not really needed to get unique symbol names.
This reduces the symbol length (and therefore the binary size) significantly.
Thanks, rjmccall, for your help!
Change the optimizer to only make specializations [fragile] if both the
original callee is [fragile] *and* the caller is [fragile].
Otherwise, the specialized callee might be [fragile] even if it is never
called from a [fragile] function, which inhibits the optimizer from
devirtualizing calls inside the specialization.
This opens up some missed optimization opportunities in the performance
inliner and devirtualization, which currently reject fragile->non-fragile
references:
TEST | OLD_MIN | NEW_MIN | DELTA (%) | SPEEDUP
--- | --- | --- | --- | ---
DictionaryRemoveOfObjects | 38391 | 35859 | -6.6% | **1.07x**
Hanoi | 5853 | 5288 | -9.7% | **1.11x**
Phonebook | 18287 | 14988 | -18.0% | **1.22x**
SetExclusiveOr_OfObjects | 20001 | 15906 | -20.5% | **1.26x**
SetUnion_OfObjects | 16490 | 12370 | -25.0% | **1.33x**
Right now, passes other than performance inlining and devirtualization
of class methods are not checking invariants on [fragile] functions
at all, which was incorrect; as part of the work on building the
standard library with -enable-resilience, I added these checks, which
regressed performance with resilience disabled. This patch makes up for
these regressions.
Furthermore, once SIL type lowering is aware of resilience, this will
allow the stack promotion pass to make further optimizations after
specializing [fragile] callees.
