Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik Eckstein
7cceaff5f3 SIL: don't print operand types in textual SIL
Type annotations for instruction operands are omitted, e.g.

```
  %3 = struct $S(%1, %2)
```

Operand types are redundant anyway and were only used for sanity checking in the SIL parser.

But: operand types _are_ printed if the definition of the operand value was not printed yet.
This happens:

* if the block with the definition appears after the block where the operand's instruction is located

* if a block or instruction is printed in isolation, e.g. in a debugger

The old behavior can be restored with `-Xllvm -sil-print-types`.
This option is added to many existing test files which check for operand types in their check-lines.
2024-11-21 18:49:52 +01:00
Slava Pestov
9ec80df97e SIL: Remove curried SILDeclRefs 2020-03-19 02:20:21 -04:00
Michael Gottesman
aa00865715 [simplify-cfg] Add a visitedBlocks set to hasSameUltimateSuccessor to prevent infinite loops.
Previously, we were not handling properly blocks that we could visit multiple
times. In this commit, I added a SmallPtrSet to ensure that we handle all of the
same cases that we handled previously.

The key reason that we want to follow this approach rather than something else
is that the previous algorithm on purpose allowed for side-entrances from other
checks since often times when we have multiple checks, all of the .none branches
funnel together into a single ultimate block.

This can be seen by the need of this code to support the test two_chained_calls
in simplify_switch_enum_objc.sil.

rdar://55861081
2019-09-30 17:03:06 -07:00
Michael Gottesman
378c6adbd6 [simplify-cfg] When determining/searching for the end of a switch_enums diamond using single successors, make sure we do not have single block self-loop.
Otherwise, we infinite loop.

rdar://52131975
2019-08-16 11:54:29 -07:00
Arnold Schwaighofer
caba405d3e This test requires objc_interop 2019-03-04 08:05:51 -08:00
Arnold Schwaighofer
5298f81249 SimplifyCFG: Simplify switch_enum on optional classes used by objc method calls
In the statement

  optional1?.objc_setter = optional2?.objc_getter?.objc_getter

we can eliminate all optional switches expect for the first switch on
optional1. We must only execute the setter if optional1 has some value.

We can simplify the following switch_enum with a branch as long all
sideffecting instructions in someBB are objc_method calls on the
optional payload or on another objc_method call that transitively uses
the payload.

 switch_enum %optionalValue, case #Optional.some!enumelt.1: someBB,
                             case #Optional.none: noneBB

 someBB(%optionalPayload):
    %1 = objc_method %optionalPayload
    %2 = apply %1(..., %optionalPayload) // self position
    br mergeBB(%2)

 noneBB:
    %4 = enum #Optional.none
    br mergeBB(%4)

rdar://48007302
2019-02-28 13:39:25 -08:00