ClassDecl::getSuperclass() produces a complete interface type describing the
superclass of a class, including any generic arguments (for a generic type).
Most callers only need the referenced ClassDecl, which is (now) cheaper
to compute: switch those callers over to ClassDecl::getSuperclassDecl().
Fixes an existing test for SR-5993.
Introduce a command-line option to visualize the complete set of output
request dependencies evaluated by a particular compile action. This is
exposing existing visualization facilities to the (-frontend) command line.
When dumping dependencies, clean up the output in two ways:
* Elide redundant but (non-cyclic) references to the same dependency.
* When dumping a cycle, highlight the path to the cycle so it stands out.
As a debugging aid, introduce a new frontend flag `-debug-cycles` that
will emit a debug dump whenever the request-evaluator encounters a cyclic
dependency, while otherwise allowing compilation to continue.
Wire up the request-evaluator with an instance in ASTContext, and
introduce two request kinds: one to retrieve the superclass of a class
declaration, and one to compute the type of an entry in the
inheritance clause.
Teach ClassDecl::getSuperclass() to go through the request-evaluator,
centralizing the logic to compute and extract the superclass
type.
Fixes the crasher from rdar://problem/26498438.
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.
Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.
Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works
Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
rather than Decl.
Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.
There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.
There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
`Int!?` or `[Int!]`.
This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.
ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!
Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
The Swift class model does not support overriding declarations where either
the overridden declaration or the overriding declaration are in an extension.
However, the Objective-C class model does, so marking the declaration as
@objc (when possible) will work around the limitation.
Customize the "cannot override declaration in extension" diagnostic to
suggest adding @objc to the overridden declaration in cases where
@objc is permitted. Fixes SR-6512 / rdar://problem/35787914.
For Swift 3 / 4:
Deprecate the spelling "ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional", emitting a warning
and suggesting "!" in places where they are allowed according to
SE-0054.
In places where SE-0054 disallowed IUOs but we continued to accept them
in previous compilers, emit a warning suggesting "Optional" or "?" as
an alternative depending on context and treat the IUO as an Optional,
noting this in the diagnostic.
For Swift 5:
Treat "ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional" as an error, suggesting
"!" in places where they are allowed by SE-0054.
In places where SE-0054 disallowed IUOs, emit an error suggestion
"Optional" or "?" as an alternative depending on context.
Per SE-0054, implicitly unwrapped optional is not a distinct type in the
type system, but rather just the notion that certain Optionals (denoted
by the sigil "!" rather than "?") can be implicitly unwrapped.
This is a first step in the direction of implementing this notion by
emitting a warning if the type is spelled out.
We allowed them for generic parameter inheritance clauses but
not anywhere else. While arguably this has stylistic benefits,
the restriction was not enforced consistently and was mostly a
result of implementation limitations.
Lift the restriction and fix things up where needed to make them
work. This brings us closer to allowing protocols to constrain
the 'Self' type to a subclass of a class by listing the class in
the protocol's inheritance clause, which was a feature from SE-0156,
but this doesn't quite work.
Fixes <https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-4678> and
<rdar://problem/31785092>.
We were checking the accessibility of the setter incorrectly.
As a result, a 'public internal(set)' property could not override
another 'public internal(set)' property; the setter had to be
public in the override, which is unnecessarily visible.
Fixes <rdar://problem/34085586>.
In today's Swift, only non-optional function parameters can be
non-escaping (and are by default). An optional function parameter uses
a function type as a generic argument to Optional, and like any other
generics that's considered an opaque and therefore possibly escaping
use of the type. This is certainly unfortunate since it means a
function parameter cannot be both Optional and non-escaping.
However, this "unfortunate" becomes a concrete problem when dealing
with Objective-C, which /does/ allow applying its 'noescape' attribute
to a callback block marked 'nullable'. This is fine for /uses/ of
methods with such parameters, but prevents anyone from /overriding/
these methods.
This patch pokes a very narrow hole into the override checking to
accomodate this: if a declaration comes from Objective-C, and it has
an optional, non-escaping closure parameter, it's okay to override it
in Swift with an optional, escaping closure parameter. This isn't
strictly safe because a caller could be relying on the
non-escaping-ness, but we don't have anything better for now. (This
behavior will probably be deprecated in the future.)
(Some people have noted that the old 'noescape' type attribute in
Swift still works, albeit with a warning. That's not something people
should have to type, though---we want to remove it from the language,
as described in SE-0103.)
rdar://problem/32903155
Using the attribute in this position is a relic from the Swift 2
days, and fixing it required letting invalid code fall through to
Sema instead of being diagnosed in Parse proper. Treat 'var'
in this position like 'let' by simply offering to remove it
instead of extracting it into a separate variable.
The general self-derived check doesn't really make sense for
conformance constraints, because we want to distinguish among
different protocol conformances.
The list of directly inherited protocols of a ProtocolDecl is already
encoded in the requirement signature, as conformance constraints where
the subject is Self. Gather the list from there rather than separately
computing/storing the list of "inherited protocols".
Previously, validateDecl() would check if the declaration had an
interface type and use that as an indication not to proceed.
However for functions we can only set an interface type after
checking the generic signature, so a recursive call to validateDecl()
on a function would "steal" the outer call and complete validation.
For generic types, this meant we could have a declaration with a
valid interface type but no generic signature.
Both cases were problematic, so narrow workarounds were put in
place with additional new flags. This made the code harder to
reason about.
This patch consolidates the flags and establishes new invariants:
- If validateDecl() returns and the declaration has no interface
type and the isBeingValidated() flag is not set, it means one
of the parent contexts is being validated by an outer recursive
call.
- If validateDecl() returns and the declaration has the
isBeingValidated() flag set, it may or may not have an interface
type. In this case, the declaration itself is being validated
by an outer recursive call.
- If validateDecl() returns and the declaration has an interface
type and the isBeingValidated() flag is not set, it means the
declaration and all of its parent contexts are fully validated
and ready for use.
In general, we still want name lookup to find things that have an
interface type but are not in a valid generic context, so for this
reason nominal types and associated types get an interface type as
early as possible.
Most other code only wants to see fully formed decls, so a new
hasValidSignature() method returns true iff the interface type is
set and the isBeingValidated() flag is not set.
For example, while resolving a type, we can resolve an unqualified
reference to a nominal type without a valid signature. However, when
applying generic parameters, the hasValidSignature() flag is used
to ensure we error out instead of crashing if the generic signature
has not yet been formed.
This leads to some bad recursion through validateDecl(), even
when called from the ITC. We already had machinery to add
implicit constructors later, it just had to be extended to
do it for the superclass as well.
One minor revision: this lifts the proposed restriction against
overriding a non-open method with an open one. On reflection,
that was inconsistent with the existing rule permitting non-public
methods to be overridden with public ones. The restriction on
subclassing a non-open class with an open class remains, and is
in fact consistent with the existing access rule.
This at least emits notes when someone overrides something but
gets the types a little wrong (more than just mismatched optionals,
as handled in d669d152).
Part of rdar://problem/26183575
