Allow keywords after `#` in freestanding macro expansions
There is no reason why we shouldn’t allow keywords here.
I also thought about allowing keywords after `@` but things become tricky here for two reasons:
- In the parser, we parse a type after the `@`, which could start with a keyword itself (e.g. `any`). If we want to keep the parser logic to parse a type after `@` (which I think we should), then it becomes unclear what `@any T` should parse as.
- We allow a space between `@` and the type name. This makes it very hard for recovery to tell whether `@ struct` refers to an attribute with name `struct` or if the user forgot to write the attribute name after `@`.
Since almost all keywords are lowercase and attached member macros are usually spelled with an uppercase name, there are a lot fewer chances for clashes here, so I don’t think it’s worth allowing keywords after `@`.
https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/66444
rdar://110472060
* Unify macro expansion parsing logic between MacroExpansionExpr and
MacroExpansionDecl
* Diagnose whitespace between '#' and the macro name
* Diagnose keyword as a macro name
Always parse macro expansions, regardless of language mode, and
eliminate the fallback path for very, very, very old object literals
like `#Color`. Instead, check for the feature flag for macro
declaration and at macro expansion time, since this is a semantic
restriction.
While here, refactor things so the vast majority of the macro-handling
logic still applies even if the Swift Swift parser is disabled. Only
attempts to expand the macro will fail. This allows us to enable the
macro-diagnostics test everywhere.
I thought it would be useful to allow some uses of a module to be
'@_implementationOnly' and others to not be in case someone wanted to
change from one to the other gradually, but it turns out that if
you're trying to /make/ an import implementation-only, you want to
know everywhere you used it.
rdar://problem/50748157
This is an attribute that gets put on an import in library FooKit to
keep it from being a requirement to import FooKit. It's not checked at
all, meaning that in this form it is up to the author of FooKit to
make sure nothing in its API or ABI depends on the implementation-only
dependency. There's also no debugging support here (debugging FooKit
/should/ import the implementation-only dependency if it's present).
The goal is to get to a point where it /can/ be checked, i.e. FooKit
developers are prevented from writing code that would rely on FooKit's
implementation-only dependency being present when compiling clients of
FooKit. But right now it's not.
rdar://problem/48985979
- Remove stray newline
- Adjust wording when recommending backticks for a keyword identifier
- Provide fix-it when encountering a keyword as an identifier
rdar://problem/25761380
When declaring a function like func repeat(){}, the diagnostic is
"expected an identifier" but 'repeat' looks like a reasonable
identifier at first glance, so actually say why it isn't.
rdar://problem/25761380
Before:
error: cannot import module being compiled
After:
warning: file 'foo.swift' is part of module 'Foo'; ignoring import
rdar://problem/22635888
Swift SVN r31995
The case where this comes up is when people name their app and framework
targets the same thing, or when they've renamed their test target module
in an attempt to avoid issues with NSClassFromString and differing
runtime names. We currently do various wrong things when this happens,
so just emit an error instead.
I left a hole for our overlays, which use '@exported import <the-current-module>'
to get at their Clang modules. The previous commit means this can be
replaced by -import-underlying-module, but that doesn't help our tests,
which use -enable-source-import for their overlays. Which we should stop doing.
rdar://problem/21254367
Swift SVN r29440
If 'x.init' appears as a member reference other than 'self.init' or 'super.init' within an initializer, treat it as a regular static member lookup for 'init' members. This allows a more explicit syntax for dynamic initializations; 'self.someMetatype()' looks too much like it's invoking a method. It also allows for partial applications of initializers using 'someMetatype.init' (though this needs some SILGen fixes, coming up next). While we're in the neighborhood, do some other correctness and QoI fixes:
- Only lookup initializers as members of metatypes, not instances, and add a fixit (instead of crashing) to insert '.dynamicType' if the initializer is found on an instance.
- Make it so that constructing a class-constrained archetype type correctly requires a 'required' or protocol initializer.
- Warn on unused initializer results. This seems to me like just the right thing to do, but is also a small guard against the fact that 'self.init' is now valid in a static method, but produces a newly-constructed value instead of delegating initialization (and evaluating to void).
Swift SVN r29344
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Fixes rdar://problem/17229052
Make it clear C_ARGV var is unsafe.
Made it impossible to set the argc/unsafeArgv outside of the stdlib.
Refactored tests to not use C_ARG{C,V}.
Made C_ARG{C,V} unavailable.
Swift SVN r23249
They were never really useful to users, because their APIs were
insufficiently public. They have been replaced with a single class,
ManagedBuffer<Value,Element>, which is really designed for user
consumption.
Swift SVN r22636
We don't want typos in import statements to take down the whole REPL, but we
/do/ want the REPL to be honoring fatal errors that effectively take down the
ASTContext.
This doesn't (yet) apply to the real LLDB REPL, which does not use
SourceFileKind::REPL for its input. The right option to test there is
LangOpts.DebuggerSupport, but that's currently being set for Playgrounds as
well. I've filed <rdar://problem/18090611> for LLDB to adjust their input.
Part of <rdar://problem/17994094>
Swift SVN r21383
Mechanically add "Type" to the end of any protocol names that don't end
in "Type," "ible," or "able." Also, drop "Type" from the end of any
associated type names, except for those of the *LiteralConvertible
protocols.
There are obvious improvements to make in some of these names, which can
be handled with separate commits.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17165920> Protocols `Integer` etc should get
uglier names.
Swift SVN r19883
Introduce the new BooleanLiteralConvertible protocol for Boolean
literals. Take "true" and "false" as real keywords (which is most of the
reason for the testsuite churn). Make Bool BooleanLiteralConvertible
and the default Boolean literal type, and ObjCBool
BooleanLiteralConvertible. Fixes <rdar://problem/17405310> and the
recent regression that made ObjCBool not work with true/false.
Swift SVN r19728
In most cases this means adding @public to things that get serialized;
in a few cases it means using a modern public stdlib API instead of
a legacy thing I was trying to keep @internal.
Swift SVN r19350
There's a lot more work to do here, but start to categorize tests
along the lines of what a specification might look like, with
directories (chapters) for basic concepts, declarations, expressions,
statements, etc.
Swift SVN r9958
