This attribute creates an unavailable extension with a `Sendable` conformance so that the type is explicity marked as not being `Sendable`.
We also fully suppress diagnostics about unavailable Sendable conformances in Swift 5 mode code. (This is not fully developed yet—it should return to being a warning in concurrent contexts.)
The behavior when a @_nonSendable and a Sendable conformance are both on the same type is also not right yet.
Extend the diagnostics for `Sendable` conformances to always diagnose
missing `Sendable` conformances for nominal types that are within the
same module. The intuition here is that if the type is in the same
module, it can be updated and evaluated at the same time as code
requiring the `Sendable` conformance is introduced.
Another part of rdar://78269348.
Rework Sendable checking to be completely based on "missing"
conformances, so that we can individually diagnose missing Sendable
conformances based on both the module in which the conformance check
happened as well as where the type was declared. The basic rules here
are to only diagnose if either the module where the non-Sendable type
was declared or the module where it was checked was compiled with a
mode that consistently diagnoses `Sendable`, either by virtue of
being Swift 6 or because `-warn-concurrency` was provided on the
command line. And have that diagnostic be an error in Swift 6 or
warning in Swift 5.x.
There is much tuning to be done here.
When looking up a conformance to Sendable fails, implicitly create a
"missing" builtin conformance. Such conformances allow type checking
to continue even in the presence of Sendable-related problems.
Diagnose these missing conformances when they are used in an actual
program, as part of availability checking for conformances and when we
are determining Sendability. This allows us to decide between an
error, a warning, and suppressing the diagnostic entirely without
affecting how the program is compiled. This is a step toward enabling
selective enforcement of Sendable.
Part of rdar://78269348.
Add implement conformance of structural types to Sendable as appropriate:
* A tuple type is Sendable when its element types are Sendable
* A metatype type is Sendable
* A function type is Sendable if it is @Sendable, thin, or C
* A builtin type is always Sendable
Implements rdar://76836578.
