Previously, missing return diagnostics for unreachable subscripts
differed from the treatment unreachable functions received, leading to
inconsistent diagnostic behavior. This change removes the responsibility
for handling the relevant diagnostics from the AST code, in favor of the
diagnostics implemented via the SIL optimizer. Additionally, where the
AST-generation code would previously have diagnosed a missing return for
an implicit empty getter, it will now admit as valid, deferring the
missing return diagnostics to the later SIL passes.
This looks like it was never properly implemented, since when we generate the
memberwise initializer for the struct in SILGen, it incorrectly tries to apply
the entire initializer expression to each variable binding in the pattern,
rather than destructuring the result and pattern-matching it to the variables.
Since it never worked it doesn't look like anyone is using this, so let's
put up an error saying it's unsupported until we can implement it properly.
Add `StructLetDestructuring` as an experimental feature flag so that tests around
the feature for things like module interface printing can still work.
If you have an empty computed property in an extension:
```swift
struct S {}
extension S {
var foo: Int {
}
}
```
Then Swift will give 2 conflicting errors: one that calls it a computed
property and another that calls it a stored property.
```
5:5: error: computed property must have accessors specified
}
^
4:9: error: extensions must not contain stored properties
var foo: Int {
^
```
This removes the unhelpful second diagnostic by adding a getter to the
property when the first diagnostic is in an extension.
This happens to me frequently. I'll decide to add a computed property,
write its declaration, then pause to decide how to implement it. The
presence of a 2nd error is both distracting and confusing.
We used to take all the captures of a local function and treat them all
as read and write usages of vars from an outer scope. Instead, let's
refactor the analysis to walk into local functions.
Make the message within 80 columns width
Improve diagnostic for read-only properties
Improve diagnostic for read-only properties
Improve diagnostic for read-only properties
* [Sema][Diagnostics] Add fixit for warning when inferring an undesirable type
* [Sema][Diagnostics] Generalize undesirable type warning to include arrays of empty tuples
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-11511
Instead, check them and their error handling right away.
In addition to fixing the crash in the radar, this also causes
us to emit unused variable warnings in functions containing
local functions.
Eventually, TC.definedFunctions should go away altogether.
Fixes <rdar://problem/53956342>.
Accessors logically belong to their storage and can be synthesized
on the fly, so removing them from the members list eliminates one
source of mutability (but doesn't eliminate it; there are also
witnesses for derived conformances, and implicit constructors).
Since a few ASTWalker implementations break in non-trivial ways when
the traversal is changed to visit accessors as children of the storage
rather than peers, I hacked up the ASTWalker to optionally preserve
the old traversal order for now. This is ugly and needs to be cleaned up,
but I want to avoid breaking _too_ much with this commit.
As part of this, lift the now-unnecessary restriction against
combining a non-mutable addressor with a setter. I've also
tweaked some of the diagnostics.
This is in preparation for generalized accessors.
By formalizing ReferenceOwnership as a diagnostic argument kind, we get
less boilerplate, better type safety, better output consistency, and
last but not least: future proofing.
When performing a binding/assignment to a weak or unowned variable/property from an initialiser call, emit a warning that the instance will be immediately deallocated.
The Swift class model does not support overriding declarations where either
the overridden declaration or the overriding declaration are in an extension.
However, the Objective-C class model does, so marking the declaration as
@objc (when possible) will work around the limitation.
Customize the "cannot override declaration in extension" diagnostic to
suggest adding @objc to the overridden declaration in cases where
@objc is permitted. Fixes SR-6512 / rdar://problem/35787914.
Conditional conformances aren't quite ready yet for Swift 4.1, so
introduce the flag `-enable-experimental-conditional-conformances` to
enable conditional conformaces, and an error when one declares a
conditional conformance without specifying the flag.
Add this flag when building the standard library (which will vend
conditional conformances) and to all of the tests that need it.
Fixes rdar://problem/35728337.
* [SR-5856] Fix diagnostic message for static stored properties not supported in protocol extensions
* fix test failure in decl/var/properties.swift
this looks like a better place to test the new behavior, so removing changes to static_var.swift
This eliminates the need for an ugly and incomplete hack to suppress
noescape inference for setter arguments. It also means we stop emitting
redundant diagnostics for problems in storage types.
We don't actually need the TypeLoc for anything, but it was still
getting type-checked, which means it doesn't get the benefit of
inference from the initial value. In some cases the actual type of the
ParamDecl seems to get reset to the TypeLoc's type as well. Just do
the simple thing and set it directly ahead of time.
Fixes a source compatibility issue with Swift 3.0.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3893
`1 { }` was parsed as a call expression with a trailing closure. This made the diagnostics for `var x = 1 { get { ... } }` extremely bad. Resolves SR-3671.
