The length could already be given by the input sequence. Also, make it
accept any generic Sequence of bytes, rather than requiring an array.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17034413>
Swift SVN r20480
...because their semantics were unclear. The new idiom is explicit
construction of the target type using the "bitPattern:" argument label:
myInt.toUnsigned() => UInt(bitPattern: myInt)
Fixes <rdar://problem/17000821>
Swift SVN r20479
Rather than embed AST info directly in binaries, we now include a special
symbol table entry that points to the serialized AST as a separate file.
This requires a very recent version of ld.
We still want to support the __SWIFT,__ast section in a binary because
that's how it's modeled in dSYM, so manually test both modes in
ASTSection_linker.swift.
Part of <rdar://problem/15796201>.
Swift SVN r20421
also, dump a bunch of other init() functions from other types.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16925296> #Seed 5: Remove unneeded String initializers
Swift SVN r20395
Lift the precondition that contiguous storage already exist on the use
of Array.withUnsafe[Mutable]PointerToElements. Automatically guarantee
that storage is unique when using the mutable variants of these methods.
Also, fix some---essentially---inout aliasing violations in
test/stdlib/Unicode.swift that were revealed by the new careful
implementation of these methods.
Swift SVN r20339
The global first() and last() algorithms return T?, nil when empty
All .first() and .last() methods became T? vars that are nil when the
Collection is empty
Swift SVN r20326
Arrays of non-verbatim-bridged types (such as Int, and today's String)
are converted to Objective-C lazily, with the objects created due to
element conversion being autoreleased when necessary.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17360154>
Note: test/SIL/Parser/array_roundtrip.swift was XFAIL'd;
see <rdar://problem/17758203>
Swift SVN r20293
Giving the invocation target proxy a type will be bogus when we turn on 'dynamic'. This breaks the NSUndoManager tests because we still can't work with lvalues through AnyObject. <rdar://problem/17755906>
Swift SVN r20283
+= only extends arrays with another sequence of the same element type.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17151420> The use of the overloaded += operator in
Swift is inconsistent and confusing with Arrays.
Note that this commits generated 3 new radars against the type checker:
<rdar://problem/17751308>
<rdar://problem/17750582>
<rdar://problem/17751359>
Swift SVN r20274
This effectively reverts all but the NSRange part of r20241, because
it's better to have consistent behavior across the platforms than have
this feature on just one platform.
Swift SVN r20252
Primarily, this means becoming resilient to Builtin.strideof(x) == 0.
Pretty much the only way to get pointers and arrays to make sense is to
treat zero-sized elements as having a stride of 1, so we do that in our
wrapper for Builtin.strideof. Other points include precondition checks
for radixes in number formatting.
Fixes <rdar://problem/17097768>
Swift SVN r20242
NSRange, NSPoint, NSSize, and NSRect. This time, using Jordan's
suggestion for iOS portability.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16973060>
Conflicts:
stdlib/objc/Foundation/CMakeLists.txt
stdlib/objc/Foundation/Foundation.swift
Swift SVN r20241
Even if the user supplies an ordering predicate that isn't a strict-weak
ordering, algorithms should not index beyond their bounds. Otherwise, a
use of withUnsafeMutableStorage for optimization purposes could easily
do an unsafe memory access.
This commit comments and tests our algorithms that require strict weak
orderings, and fixes safety problems in partition(). Most benchmarks
are unaffected, but the rewrite of partition produces a 27% speedup in
the Phonebook benchmark at -O3 and a 22% speedup at -Ofast.
Also, at -Ofast, QuickSort lost 6% and RC4 gained 6%. These benchmarks
were not noticeably affected at -O3
====================`PrecommitBench_O3`====================
````benchmark`,`baserun0`,`baserun1`,`baserun2`,``optrun0`,``optrun1`,``optrun2`,``delta`,`speedup`
````Phonebook`,``1608.00`,``1676.00`,``1651.00`,``1265.00`,``1278.00`,``1281.00`,`343.00`,```27.1%`
````QuickSort`,```430.00`,```448.00`,```429.00`,```428.00`,```431.00`,```428.00`,```1.00`,````0.2%`
``````````RC4`,```925.00`,```924.00`,```922.00`,```916.00`,```919.00`,```917.00`,```6.00`,````0.7%`
====================`PrecommitBench_Ofast`====================
````benchmark`,`baserun0`,`baserun1`,`baserun2`,``optrun0`,``optrun1`,``optrun2`,``delta`,`speedup`
````Phonebook`,``1521.00`,``1546.00`,``1591.00`,``1252.00`,``1255.00`,``1256.00`,`269.00`,```21.5%`
````QuickSort`,```478.00`,```477.00`,```476.00`,```506.00`,```510.00`,```513.00`,``30.00`,```-5.9%`
``````````RC4`,``1033.00`,``1874.00`,``1030.00`,```974.00`,```982.00`,```975.00`,``56.00`,````5.7%`
Swift SVN r20202
We've decided resilience is wrong for Swift given current constraints;
see rdar://problem/11940897 for more detail.
This reverts commit r20052
Swift SVN r20127
It wasn't properly handling the cases where the bound was in the
opposite direction from the amount, when advancing random access
indices.
Swift SVN r20123
