Also, make some related changes, like updating a path in the Android doc, making sure the
`unknown` vendor is always used, and using `CPU` instead of `CODEGENERATOR`.
This is the start of the removal of the C++ implementation of libSyntax
in favor of the new Swift Parser and Swift Syntax libraries. Now that
the Swift Parser has switched the SwiftSyntaxParser library over to
being a thin wrapper around the Swift Parser, there is no longer any
reason we need to retain any libSyntax infrastructure in the swift
compiler.
As a first step, delete the infrastructure that builds
lib_InternalSwiftSyntaxParser and convert any scripts that mention
it to instead mention the static mirror libraries. The --swiftsyntax
build-script flag has been retained and will now just execute the
SwiftSyntax and Swift Parser builds with the just-built tools.
In the Swift grammar, the top-level of a source file is a mix of three
different kinds of "items": declarations, statements, and expressions.
However, the existing parser forces all of these into declarations at
parse time, wrapping statements and expressions in TopLevelCodeDecls,
so the primary API for getting the top-level entities in source files
is based on getting declarations.
Start generalizing the representation by storing ASTNode instances at
the top level, rather than declaration pointers, updating many (but
not all!) uses of this API. The walk over declarations is a (cached)
filter to pick out all of the declarations. Existing parsed files are
unaffected (the parser still creates top-level code declarations), but
the new "macro expansion" source file kind skips creating top-level
code declarations so we get the pure parse tree. Additionally, some
generalized clients (like ASTScope lookup) will now look at the list
of items, so they'll be able to walk into statements and expressions
without the intervening TopLevelCodeDecl.
Over time, I'd like to phase out `getTopLevelDecls()` entirely,
relying on the new `getTopLevelItems()` for parsed content. We can
introduce TopLevelCodeDecls more lazily for semantic walks.
I am not sure what is wrong: the text or my understanding of upstream/downstream terminology, but it seems that nameres happens before generics, and nameres results *flow* into generics, so it must be upstream, right?
Made bare @instruction and @block more useful. Rather than referring to
the first instruction and block in the current function, instead, they
now refer to the instruction after the test_specification instruction
(which must always exist) and the block containing the
test_specification instruction.
* Running the entire test suite is unnecessarily burdensome for newcomers, given
the already considerable build times.
* Test failures are not a beginner-friendly indication of an out-of-sync
checkout, nor is such an indication generally worth the expenses.
* We do not want a known issue to block anyone’s workflow.
Added new C++-to-Swift callback for isDeinitBarrier.
And pass it CalleeAnalysis so it can depend on function effects. For
now, the argument is ignored. And, all callers just pass nullptr.
Promoted to API the mayAccessPointer component predicate of
isDeinitBarrier which needs to remain in C++. That predicate will also
depends on function effects. For that reason, it too is now passed a
BasicCalleeAnalysis and is moved into SILOptimizer.
Also, added more conservative versions of isDeinitBarrier and
maySynchronize which will never consider side-effects.
