When an optional requirement of an @objc protocol has a selector that
collides with an entity that has a different *Swift* name but produces
an Objective-C method with the same selector, we have an existing
diagnostic complaining about the conflict. In such cases, make a few
suggestions (with Fix-Its) to improve the experience:
* Change Swift name to match the requirement, adding or modifying the
@objc as appropriate.
* Add "@nonobjc" to silence the diagnostic, explicitly opting out of
matching an @objc requirement.
This is intended to help with migration of Swift 2 code into Swift
3. The Swift 2 code will produce selectors that match Objective-C
methods in the protocol from Swift names that don't match; this helps
fix up those Swift names so that we now match.
Fixes the rest of rdar://problem/25159872. In some sense, it's a
stop-gap for more detailed checking of near-misses for optional
requirements, but it's not clear how wide-reaching such changes would
be.
- Extract the cache entry type to a top-level type that can be used in the
signature of the function.
- Rewrite the implementation of the type in terms of standard LLVM ADTs
instead of manual bit manipulation.
- Add support for trivial-with-optional types (none of which exist yet).
- Drop the use of SIL/BridgedTypes.def; the only non-trivial non-object
bridged type today is 'Bool' (for ObjCBool and DarwinBoolean) and that's
already trivially bridged to CBool too.
- Save an Identifier lookup when possible.
- Finally, rename the function to getForeignRepresentationInfo.
No intended functionality change.
With the exception of a specific whitelist of cases where the
Foundation module defines conformances to _ObjectiveCBridgeable for
standard library types, only permit an _ObjectiveCBridgeable
conformance in the same module as the type that's conforming to the
protocol. Among other things, this prevents the optimizer from
concluding that a dynamic cast between a Swift value type and its
bridged Objective-C class type can never succeed. See
34ff1c8e6d
for the optimizer issue. As part of this, bring the whitelist in sync
with reality, now that the compiler enforces it.
Migrate the check for whether a given type is representable in
Objective-C, which is currently used to verify when @objc can be
inferred or verify that an explicitly-written @objc is well-formed,
from Sema into a set of queries on the Type within the AST library, so
it can be used in other parts of the compiler.
As part of this refactoring, clean up and improve a number of aspects
of this code:
* Unify the "trivially representable" and "representable" code paths
into a single code path that covers these cases. Clarify the
different levels of "representable" we have in both the code and
in comments.
* Distinguish between representation in C vs. representation in
Objective-C. While we aren't using this now, I'm anticipating it
being useful to allow exporting C interfaces via @_cdecl (or
similar).
* Eliminate the special cases for bridging String/Array/Dictionary/Set
with their Foundation counterparts; we now consult
_ObjectiveCBridgeable conformances exclusively to get this
information.
* Cache foreign-representation information on the ASTContext in a
manner that will let us more easily get the right answer across
different contexts while providing more sharing than the TypeChecker
version.
Annoyingly, this only seemed to fix a small class of error where we
were permitting Unsafe(Mutable)Pointer<T> to be representable in
Objective-C when T was representable but not trivially representable,
e.g., T=String or T=AnyObject.Type.
Fix some interface type/context type confusion in the AST synthesis from the previous patch, add a unique private mangling for behavior protocol conformances, and set up SILGen to emit the conformances when property declarations with behaviors are visited. Disable synthesis of the struct memberwise initializer if any instance properties use behaviors; codegen will need to be redesigned here.
Parse 'var [behavior] x: T', and when we see it, try to instantiate the property's
implementation in terms of the given behavior. To start out, behaviors are modeled
as protocols. If the protocol follows this pattern:
```
protocol behavior {
associatedtype Value
}
extension behavior {
var value: Value { ... }
}
```
then the property is instantiated by forming a conformance to `behavior` where
`Self` is bound to the enclosing type and `Value` is bound to the property's
declared type, and invoking the accessors of the `value` implementation:
```
struct Foo {
var [behavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private behavior {
@implements(behavior.Value)
private typealias `[behavior].Value` = Int
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
If the protocol requires a `storage` member, and provides an `initStorage` method
to provide an initial value to the storage:
```
protocol storageBehavior {
associatedtype Value
var storage: Something<Value> { ... }
}
extension storageBehavior {
var value: Value { ... }
static func initStorage() -> Something<Value> { ... }
}
```
then a stored property of the appropriate type is instantiated to witness the
requirement, using `initStorage` to initialize:
```
struct Foo {
var [storageBehavior] foo: Int
}
/* behaves like */
extension Foo: private storageBehavior {
@implements(storageBehavior.Value)
private typealias `[storageBehavior].Value` = Int
@implements(storageBehavior.storage)
private var `[storageBehavior].storage`: Something<Int> = initStorage()
var foo: Int {
get { return value }
set { value = newValue }
}
}
```
In either case, the `value` and `storage` properties should support any combination
of get-only/settable and mutating/nonmutating modifiers. The instantiated property
follows the settability and mutating-ness of the `value` implementation. The
protocol can also impose requirements on the `Self` and `Value` types.
Bells and whistles such as initializer expressions, accessors,
out-of-line initialization, etc. are not implemented. Additionally, behaviors
that instantiate storage are currently only supported on instance properties.
This also hasn't been tested past sema yet; SIL and IRGen will likely expose
additional issues.
TypeAlignments.h predates this whole mess; it was used for types with
stronger alignment in PointerLikeTypeTraits than the old default of
"2 by fiat and assumption". All remaining forward-declared types are
AST types, so fold them into TypeAlignments.h.
(The one exception is SILTypeList.h, but that's already gone on master.)
To avoid future ODR issues, explicitly include TypeAlignments.h into
every header that defines a type it forward-declares.
I wish we could use partial specialization to provide PointerLikeTypeTraits
for all derived classes of Decl, TypeBase, etc, but that's not something
you can do in C++ if you don't control the traits class.
As part of the improved import of Objective-C APIs into Swift, strip
the "NS" prefix from entities defined in the Foundation
framework. Addresses rdar://problem/24050011, which is part of
SE-0005. Naturally, this is hidden behind -enable-omit-needless-words.
As part of the improved import of Objective-C APIs into Swift, strip
the "NS" prefix from entities defined in the Foundation
framework. Addresses rdar://problem/24050011, which is part of
SE-0005. Naturally, this is hidden behind -enable-omit-needless-words.
mode (take 2)
Allow untyped placeholder to take arbitrary type, but default to Void.
Add _undefined<T>() function, which is like fatalError() but has
arbitrary return type. In playground mode, merely warn about outstanding
placeholders instead of erroring out, and transform placeholders into
calls to _undefined(). This way, code with outstanding placeholders will
only crash when it attempts to evaluate such placeholders.
When generating constraints for an iterated sequence of type T, emit
T convertible to $T1
$T1 conforms to SequenceType
instead of
T convertible to SequenceType
This ensures that an untyped placeholder in for-each sequence position
doesn't get inferred to have type SequenceType. (The conversion is still
necessary because the sequence may have IUO type.) The new constraint
system precipitates changes in CSSimplify and CSDiag, and ends up fixing
18741539 along the way.
(NOTE: There is a small regression in diagnosis of issues like the
following:
class C {}
class D: C {}
func f(a: [C]!) { for _: D in a {} }
It complains that [C]! doesn't conform to SequenceType when it should be
complaining that C is not convertible to D.)
<rdar://problem/21167372>
(Originally Swift SVN r31481)
The properties of a context indicate those things that are considered
"contained within" the context (among other things). This helps us
avoid producing overly-generic names when we identify a redundancy in
the base name. For example, NSView contains the following:
var gestureRecognizers: [NSGestureRecognizer]
func addGestureRecognizer(gestureRecognizer: NSGestureRecognizer)
func removeGestureRecognizer(gestureRecognizer: NSGestureRecognizer)
Normally, omit-needless-words would prune the two method names down to
"add" and "remove", respectively, because they restate type
information. However, this pruning is not ideal, because a view isn't
primarily a collection of gesture recognizers.
Use the presence of the property "gestureRecognizers" to indicate that
we should not strip "gestureRecognizer" or "gestureRecognizers" from
the base names of methods within that class (or its subclasses).
Note that there is more work to do here to properly deal with API
evolution: a newly-added property shouldn't have any effect on
existing APIs. We should use availability information here, and only
consider properties introduced no later than the entity under
consideration.
When the first parameter of a function has Boolean type, try to create
an argument label for it. We start with the (normally non-API)
parameter name as the argument label, then try to match that against
the end of the base name of the method to eliminate redundancy. Add a
little magic, and here are some diffs:
- func openUntitledDocumentAndDisplay(_: Bool) throws -> NSDocument
+ func openUntitledDocument(display _: Bool) throws -> NSDocument
- func fontMenu(_: Bool) -> NSMenu?
- func fontPanel(_: Bool) -> NSFontPanel?
+ func fontMenu(create _: Bool) -> NSMenu?
+ func fontPanel(create _: Bool) -> NSFontPanel?
- func lockFocusFlipped(_: Bool)
+ func lockFocus(flipped _: Bool)
- func rectForSearchTextWhenCentered(_: Bool) -> NSRect
+ func rectForSearchText(whenCentered _: Bool) -> NSRect
- func dismissPreviewAnimated(_: Bool)
- func dismissMenuAnimated(_: Bool)
+ func dismissPreview(animated _: Bool)
+ func dismissMenu(animated _: Bool)
Swift SVN r32392
Extend GenericSignature to be able to answer queries about the
requirements placed on dependent types, e.g, are the class-bound, to
what protocols must they conform, etc. Implement this using a
lazily-created ArchetypeBuilder on the canonical generic signature.
NFC and as-yet-untested; this is staging for reducing our dependence
on the "all archetypes" list.
Swift SVN r32340
When completing at the sequence position of for each statment (for i in <HRER> {}),
values of sequence type should have higher priority than the rest.
Swift SVN r32202
Allow untyped placeholder to take arbitrary type, but default to Void.
Add _undefined<T>() function, which is like fatalError() but has
arbitrary return type. In playground mode, merely warn about outstanding
placeholders instead of erroring out, and transform placeholders into
calls to _undefined(). This way, code with outstanding placeholders will
only crash when it attempts to evaluate such placeholders.
<rdar://problem/21167372> transform EditorPlaceholderExpr into fatalError()
Swift SVN r31481
the regressions that r31105 introduced in the validation tests, as well as fixing a number
of other validation tests as well.
Introduce a new UnresolvedType to the type system, and have CSDiags start to use it
as a way to get more type information out of incorrect subexpressions. UnresolvedType
generally just propagates around the type system like a type variable:
- it magically conforms to all protocols
- it CSGens as an unconstrained type variable.
- it ASTPrints as _, just like a type variable.
The major difference is that UnresolvedType can be used outside the context of a
ConstraintSystem, which is useful for CSGen since it sets up several of them to
diagnose subexpressions w.r.t. their types.
For now, our use of this is extremely limited: when a closureexpr has no contextual
type available and its parameters are invalid, we wipe them out with UnresolvedType
(instead of the previous nulltype dance) to get ambiguities later on.
We also introduce a new FreeTypeVariableBinding::UnresolvedType approach for
constraint solving (and use this only in one place in CSDiags so far, to resolve
the callee of a CallExpr) which solves a system and rewrites any leftover type
variables as UnresolvedTypes. This allows us to get more precise information out,
for example, diagnosing:
func r22162441(lines: [String]) {
lines.map { line in line.fooBar() }
}
with: value of type 'String' has no member 'fooBar'
instead of: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
This improves a number of other diagnostics as well, but is just the infrastructural
stepping stone for greater things.
Swift SVN r31130
