Commit Graph

3981 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Hoppen
d3270c1476 [CodeCompletion] Calling a static function on a type is not unapplied 2023-07-07 19:51:01 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
928a03a2e0 [CodeCompletion] Migrate conforming methods list to solver-based 2023-07-07 19:51:01 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
00eaed3af9 [CodeCompletion] Migrate postfix expr completion to solver-based 2023-07-07 19:51:01 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
c385fe5e87 [CodeCompletion] Migrate PostfixExprParen to solver-based 2023-07-07 19:50:46 +02:00
Alex Hoppen
6cec68e302 [IDE] Ignore score kinds that represent implicit conversions when solving for code completion
Ignore conversion score increases during code completion to make sure we don't filter solutions that might start receiving the best score based on a choice of the code completion token.
2023-07-07 19:50:46 +02:00
Holly Borla
7a46466b65 Merge pull request #66967 from hborla/extension-macro
[Macros] Generalize `conformance` macros as `extension` macros
2023-06-29 08:57:04 -07:00
Ben Barham
12ebe0aab8 Merge pull request #66944 from bnbarham/index-macro-generics
[Index] Include generic macro arguments
2023-06-28 09:35:36 -07:00
Erik Eckstein
6b1697eb06 use new llvm::Optional APIs to fix deprecation warnings 2023-06-28 14:28:38 +02:00
Holly Borla
725374e0d8 [Macros] Implement attached extension macros. 2023-06-27 21:22:12 -07:00
Ben Barham
9bc26cbf96 [Index] Include generic macro arguments
`ASTWalker` was missing a walk into the generic arguments for
freestanding declarations and expressions. `SemaAnnotator` was missing
the walk into the `TypeRepr` when walking over custom attributes.

Resolves rdar://110856428.
2023-06-27 16:34:44 -07:00
Evan Wilde
250082df25 [NFC] Reformat all the LLVMs
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Evan Wilde
f3ff561c6f [NFC] add llvm namespace to Optional and None
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
                     bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".

I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Keith Smiley
e9ff334778 Fix missing indexing data with overloaded type (#65729)
When you have a type that's ambiguous because it's defined in 2 imported
modules, but you don't have to disambiguate by using the module name,
previously no index references were produced. Now most are for the
common case, but notably nested type constructors and generics still
aren't emitted, partially because of https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/65726

Fixes: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/64598
2023-06-23 09:58:17 -07:00
Ben Barham
a0fa946e10 [Completion] Add targetEnvironment(macCatalyst) platform condition
Resolves rdar://110870396.
2023-06-22 16:31:03 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
9f51c06db6 Merge pull request #66517 from ahoppen/ahoppen/iterator-invalidation
[CodeCompletion] Fix an issue that causes an iterator to be invalidated while iterating
2023-06-12 11:58:14 -07:00
Holly Borla
706411d2e6 [CodeCompletion] Plumb source locations through code completion name lookup. 2023-06-11 23:10:43 -07:00
Holly Borla
cd752cca22 [NameLookup] Plumb source location arguments through all name lookup APIs.
This source location will be used to determine whether to add a name lookup
option to exclude macro expansions when the name lookup request is constructed.
Currently, the source location argument is unused.
2023-06-11 23:09:47 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
0996342b47 [CodeCompletion] Fix an issue that causes an iterator to be invalidated while iterating
In `SourceLookupCache::lookupVisibleDecls`, copy the top level values before iterating them.

If we have 'addinitstotoplevel' enabled, calling 'addConstructorCallsForType' can cause macros to get expanded, which can then cause new members ot get added to 'TopLevelValues', invalidating the current iterator.

I have not been able to reduce this to a test case that doesn’t rely on the `Observation` module in the SDK but here is the test case with which I was able to reproduce the issue very reliably.

```swift
import Foundation
import Observation

@Observable class MyObject {}

extension MyObject {}

// RUN: ~/sbin/sourcekitd-test \
// RUN:   -req=complete.open \
// RUN:   -req-opts=addinitstotoplevel=1 \
// RUN:   -pos=8:1 \
// RUN:   %s \
// RUN:   -- \
// RUN:   %s \
// RUN:   -Xfrontend \
// RUN:   -load-plugin-library \
// RUN:   -Xfrontend \
// RUN:   /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/lib/swift/host/plugins/libObservationMacros.dylib \
// RUN:   -sdk \
// RUN:   /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX14.0.sdk
```

rdar://109202157
2023-06-09 17:11:28 -07:00
Ben Barham
7b74f72440 Merge pull request #66421 from bnbarham/index-macro-conformances
[IDE] Visit auxiliary declarations if walking expansions
2023-06-08 08:26:36 -07:00
Ben Barham
b3af130e90 [IDE] Visit auxiliary declarations if walking expansions
After visiting declarations, also walk into their auxiliary decls if
expansions are being walked.

Resolves rdar://109548265.
2023-06-07 20:02:06 -07:00
Rintaro Ishizaki
c3d1304345 [SourceKit] Add request to expand macros syntactically
Expand macros in the specified source file syntactically (without any
module imports, nor typechecking).

Request would look like:
```
{
  key.compilerargs: [...]
  key.sourcefile: <file name>
  key.sourcetext: <source text> (optional)
  key.expansions: [<expansion specifier>...]
}
```
`key.compilerargs` are used for getting plugins search paths. If
`key.sourcetext` is not specified, it's loaded from the file system.
Each `<expansion sepecifier>` is
```
{
  key.offset: <offset>
  key.modulename: <plugin module name>
  key.typename: <macro typename>
  key.macro_roles: [<macro role UID>...]
}
```
Clients have to provide the module and type names because that's
semantic.

Response is a `CategorizedEdits` just like (semantic) "ExpandMacro"
refactoring. But without `key.buffer_name`. Nested expnasions are not
supported at this point.
2023-06-07 14:26:40 -07:00
Hamish Knight
7a137d6756 [CS] Allow ExprPatterns to be type-checked in the solver
Previously we would wait until CSApply, which
would trigger their type-checking in
`coercePatternToType`. This caused a number of
bugs, and hampered solver-based completion, which
does not run CSApply. Instead, form a conjunction
of all the ExprPatterns present, which preserves
some of the previous isolation behavior (though
does not provide complete isolation).

We can then modify `coercePatternToType` to accept
a closure, which allows the solver to take over
rewriting the ExprPatterns it has already solved.

This then sets the stage for the complete removal
of `coercePatternToType`, and doing all pattern
type-checking in the solver.
2023-06-07 00:35:01 +01:00
mojh7
2dac0512e7 fix minor typo
exmaple -> example
2023-05-23 15:17:53 +09:00
Alex Hoppen
1db0947760 Merge pull request #65837 from ahoppen/ahoppen/fix-asan-failure 2023-05-13 23:56:41 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
e8a32e45be Merge pull request #65805 from ahoppen/ahoppen/complete-constraint-type
[CodeComplete] Offer completions after `~` in an inheritance clause
2023-05-12 13:32:40 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
9dd87e9c4e [CodeCompletion] Fix ASAN failure when completing in parameter packs
Whe completing in parameter packs, we were calling `getParameterAt` with `Res.FuncDeclRef`. But the substitution map in `Res.FuncDeclRef` contained type variables that were allocated in the constraint system’s arena. And that arena had been freed when we call this from `deliverResults`.

The fix is to compute the optional parameters in advance in `sawSolutionImpl`

rdar://109093909
2023-05-10 15:24:19 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
2abae1019f [CodeComplete] Offer completions after ~ in an inheritance clause
We should only be suggesting `Copyable` after `~` in an inheritance clause, in accordance with [SE-0390](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0390-noncopyable-structs-and-enums.md)

rdar://109063223
2023-05-09 20:21:30 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
3ee4668532 [CodeComplete] Fix a nullptr crash
If `FuncDeclRef` is `null` we shouldn’t be trying to get any parameters from it.
2023-05-09 13:41:42 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
a139962622 Merge pull request #65720 from ahoppen/ahoppen/complete-parameter-pack-arg
[CodeCompletion] Fix a crash when completing an argument to a function taking a parameter pack
2023-05-08 10:51:37 -07:00
Keith Smiley
f5fbee2f26 Fix indexing constructors with generic parameters (#65597)
Previously in the case of a constructor like `A<Int>(value: 1)`
`Fn->getLoc()` returned the location of `>(value: 1)` while the actual
location we're looking for is correctly the start of `A<Int>(value: 1)`.
This adjusts the location we're looking up to use the start location of
the constructor instead.

Fixes: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/54532
2023-05-05 15:20:07 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
6d8b1f42c7 [CodeCompletion] Fix a crash when completing an argument to a function taking a parameter pack
We previously asserted that for a call the function type had the same number of parameters as the declaration. But that’s not true for parameter packs anymore because the parameter pack will be exploded in the function type to account for passing multiple arguments to the pack.

To fix this, use `ConcreteDeclRef` instead of a `ValueDecl`, which has a substitution map and is able to account for the exploded parameter packs when accessed using `getParameterAt`.

rdar://100066716
2023-05-05 15:18:57 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
c140fe480c [CodeCompletion] Only show type annotations for macros that return non-void
Showing the type annotation only makes sense if they are not `Void`. That’s consistent with functions where we also don’t show a `Void` return type. Most importantly, we shouldn’t be showing a `Void` type annotation for attached macros.

rdar://108870970
2023-05-04 18:02:26 -07:00
swift-ci
27d9d65872 Merge pull request #65512 from keith/ks/fix-missing-indexing-data-when-using-self-initializer
Fix missing indexing data when using Self initializer
2023-05-04 16:04:07 -07:00
Keith Smiley
1d3a9baed2 Fix missing indexing data when using Self initializer
Fixes: https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/64686
2023-05-04 10:47:15 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
53e57230a4 Merge pull request #65572 from ahoppen/ahoppen/macro-arg-completion
[CodeComplete] Offer code completion for attached macro attributes
2023-05-03 19:07:19 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
01cebd68a8 [CodeComplete] Offer code completion for attached macro attributes
We need to teach code completion how to invoke the type checker for attached macro attributes. After that, everything started working.

rdar://105232015
2023-05-01 21:11:24 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
e4a0b9e8c5 Merge pull request #65521 from ahoppen/ahoppen/name-suggestions
[CodeComplete] Offer completions for the `names:` argument of a macro declaration
2023-05-01 20:05:58 -07:00
Ben Barham
3368e710a2 Merge pull request #65515 from bnbarham/add-attached-type-relation
[Completion] Add convertible type relation for attached macros
2023-05-01 09:52:04 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
1e505791e4 [CodeComplete] Offer completions for the names: argument of a macro declaration
When completing after `names:`, completion should offer the different ways you can specify the names, i.e. `arbitrary`, `named`, etc.

```
@freestanding(declaration, names: #^COMPLETE^#)
```

rdar://108535077
2023-04-28 17:20:45 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
053d215d55 Merge pull request #65427 from ahoppen/ahoppen/macro-attribute-completions
[CodeCompletion] Support completion for macro roles and the 'names:' argument label
2023-04-28 17:20:24 -07:00
Ben Barham
f7d1cc8426 [Completion] Add convertible type relation for attached macros
Resolves rdar://108678938.
2023-04-28 16:15:51 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
6098a3ca2b [CodeCompletion] Support completion for macro roles and the 'names:' argument label
rdar://108163121
2023-04-27 21:48:06 -07:00
Alex Hoppen
cb6304c350 Merge pull request #65428 from ahoppen/ahoppen/macro-keyword-completions
[CodeCompletion] Suggest freestanding after @
2023-04-27 18:21:59 -07:00
Hamish Knight
b8ae0666ad Rename getBriefComment -> getSemanticBriefComment
Make it clear that we will walk the comment providing
decls if needed.
2023-04-26 12:38:38 +01:00
Hamish Knight
c1843479f1 Drop SerializedOK parameter from getRawComment
It doesn't seem like there's any client that's
actually taking advantage of setting it to `false`,
and its default value of `false` is more likely
than not going to cause clients to accidentally
miss comments that they may want. In fact, this
was exactly the case for code completion's brief
field. Finally, the parameter wasn't even
consistently applied, as we would attempt to
deserialize swiftdoc comments even if it were
`false`.
2023-04-26 12:38:37 +01:00
Alex Hoppen
d5e97501fa [CodeCompletion] Suggest freestanding after @
rdar://108163121
2023-04-25 18:06:47 -07:00
Holly Borla
d7388346c5 Merge pull request #65313 from hborla/fix-macro-expansion-walking
[Macros] Fix type-checking local pattern bindings in macro-expanded closures.
2023-04-20 07:39:55 -07:00
Holly Borla
265c8a47d9 [Macros] Fix an issue where the constraint system skipped local declarations
inside closures while type checking a macro expansion.

PreCheckExpr, ConstraintGenerator, and other walkers do not walk into macro
expansions. However, the implementation of this macro walking behavior in
ASTWalker would skip any declaration that appears inside any macro expansion
buffer. This is incorrect for cases where the parent is in the same macro
expansion buffer, because the local declaration is not inside a new macro
expansion. This caused bogus errors when type checking expanded macro expressions
containing closures with local declarations, because pre-check and constraint
generation mistakenly skipped local pattern bindings.
2023-04-19 20:11:38 -07:00
Alexis Laferrière
1ddc7939cd Merge pull request #65168 from xymus/display-public-only
[IDE] Inject Sendable conformance on public types only in `getTopLevelDeclsForDisplay`
2023-04-17 17:36:28 -07:00
Alexis Laferrière
7f32a9e8c4 [IDE] Inject Sendable conformance on public types only
When getTopLevelDeclsForDisplay is called on an imported module, it may
lists non-public decls. If we they try to inject the conformance on
Sendable on internal types, the compiler may crash on failing to
deserialize internal details. As a fix, let's only inject the
conformance on public or package types.

rdar://95430471
2023-04-14 13:40:02 -07:00