The problem with `is_escaping_closure` was that it didn't consume its operand and therefore reference count checks were unreliable.
For example, copy-propagation could break it.
As this instruction was always used together with an immediately following `destroy_value` of the closure, it makes sense to combine both into a `destroy_not_escaped_closure`.
It
1. checks the reference count and returns true if it is 1
2. consumes and destroys the operand
Don't form a set of unreachable blocks, we only need to check whether
any given block is unreachable, which can be done via
`ReachableBlocks::isVisited`.
When checking whether an instruction is contained in a liveness
boundary, a pointer to a DeadEndBlocks instance must always be passed.
When the pointer is null, it is only checked that the instruction occurs
within the direct live region. When the pointer is non-null, it is
checked whether the instruction occurs within the region obtained by
extending the live region up to the availability boundary within
dead-end regions that are adjacent to the non-lifetime-ending portion of
the liveness boundary.
For a mark_dependence user of the stack, look through the mark_dependence chain
to match the partial_apply.
Since this is a superset of the `markDepChain` logic, remove that.
So that we don't have 2 ways to check for the same.
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Compute, update and handle borrowed-from instruction in various utilities and passes.
Also, used borrowed-from to simplify `gatherBorrowIntroducers` and `gatherEnclosingValues`.
Replace those utilities by `Value.getBorrowIntroducers` and `Value.getEnclosingValues`, which return a lazily computed Sequence of borrowed/enclosing values.
For years, optimizer engineers have been hitting a common bug caused by passes
assuming all SILValues have a parent function only to be surprised by SILUndef.
Generally we see SILUndef not that often so we see this come up later in
testing. This patch eliminates that problem by making SILUndef uniqued at the
function level instead of the module level. This ensures that it makes sense for
SILUndef to have a parent function, eliminating this possibility since we can
define an API to get its parent function.
rdar://123484595
In preparation for inserting mark_dependence instructions for lifetime
dependencies early, immediately after SILGen. That will simplify the
implementation of borrowed arguments.
Marking them unresolved is needed to make OSSA verification
conservative until lifetime dependence diagnostics runs.
The dependent 'value' may be marked 'nonescaping', which guarantees that the
lifetime dependence is statically enforceable. In this case, the compiler
must be able to follow all values forwarded from the dependent 'value', and
recognize all final (non-forwarded, non-escaping) use points. This implies
that `findPointerEscape` is false. A diagnostic pass checks that the
incoming SIL to verify that these use points are all initially within the
'base' lifetime. Regular 'mark_dependence' semantics ensure that
optimizations cannot violate the lifetime dependence after diagnostics.
To verify if a function may read from an indirect argument, don't use AliasAnalysis.
Instead use the CalleeCache to get the list of callees of an apply instruction.
Then use a simple call-back into the swift Function to check if a callee has any relevant memory effect set.
This avoids a dependency from SIL to the Optimizer.
It fixes a linker error when building some unit tests in debug.
When deciding whether to clean up copies of noncopyable captures, I got
the parameter indexing wrong when the closure has non-capture arguments.
Fixing this allows noncopyable captures to work in more general
circumstances.
Without this fix, the new 'consuming' and 'borrowing' keywords cannot
be used with trivial types. Which means, for example, they can't be
used in macro expansions that work on various types.
Fixes patterns like:
public func test1(i: consuming Int) -> Int {
takeClosure { [i = copy i] in i }
}
public func test2(i: borrowing Int) -> Int {
takeClosure { [i = copy i] in i }
}
public func test3(i: consuming Int) -> Int {
takeClosure { i }
}
// Sadly, test4 is still incorrectly diagnosed.
public func test4(i: borrowing Int) -> Int {
takeClosure { i }
}
Fixes rdar://112795074 (Crash compiling function that has a macro annotation and uses `consuming`)
llvm::SmallSetVector changed semantics
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D152497) resulting in build failures in Swift.
The old semantics allowed usage of types that did not have an
`operator==` because `SmallDenseSet` uses `DenseSetInfo<T>::isEqual` to
determine equality. The new implementation switched to using
`std::find`, which internally uses `operator==`. This type is used
pretty frequently with `swift::Type`, which intentionally deletes
`operator==` as it is not the canonical type and therefore cannot be
compared in normal circumstances.
This patch adds a new type-alias to the Swift namespace that provides
the old semantic behavior for `SmallSetVector`. I've also gone through
and replaced usages of `llvm::SmallSetVector` with the
`Swift::SmallSetVector` in places where we're storing a type that
doesn't implement or explicitly deletes `operator==`. The changes to
`llvm::SmallSetVector` should improve compile-time performance, so I
left the `llvm::SmallSetVector` where possible.
SILGen introduces a copy of the capture, because the semantics of escaping partial_apply's
requires the closure to take ownership of the parameters. We don't know when a closure is
strictly nonescaping or its final lifetime until ClosureLifetimeFixup runs, but that replaces
the consume of the copy with a borrow of the copy normally, hoping later passes fix it up.
We can't wait that long for move-only types, which can't be copied, so try to remove the
copy up front when the copy lives long enough and has no interfering uses other than the
partial_apply. rdar://110137169
Optimizations can rely on alias analysis to know that an in-argument (or parts of it) is not actually read.
We have to do the same in the verifier: if alias analysis says that an in-argument is not read, there is no need that the memory location is initialized.
Fixes a false verifier error.
rdar://106806899
Although nonescaping closures are representationally trivial pointers to their
on-stack context, it is useful to model them as borrowing their captures, which
allows for checking correct use of move-only values across the closure, and
lets us model the lifetime dependence between a closure and its captures without
an ad-hoc web of `mark_dependence` instructions.
During ownership elimination, We eliminate copy/destroy_value instructions and
end the partial_apply's lifetime with an explicit dealloc_stack as before,
for compatibility with existing IRGen and non-OSSA aware passes.
Previously, the dealloc_stacks created for the alloc_stacks used to pass
@in_guaranteed arguments to on_stack closures were created after the
users of the closure. When SILGen created these alloc_stacks in the
same block as the users, this happened to work. Now that
AddressLowering creates such alloc_stacks elsewhere, this approach
results in invalid SIL.
Here, the dealloc_stacks are instead at the end of each block in the
dominance frontier of the alloc_stack.
Add `deletableInstructions()` and `reverseDeletableInstructions()` in SILBasicBlock.
It allows deleting instructions while iterating over all instructions of the block.
This is a replacement for `InstructionDeleter::updatingRange()`.
It's a simpler implementation than the existing `UpdatingListIterator` and `UpdatingInstructionIteratorRegistry`, because it just needs to keep the prev/next pointers for "deleted" instructions instead of the iterator-registration machinery.
It's also safer, because it doesn't require to delete instructions via a specific instance of an InstructionDeleter (which can be missed easily).
Now that it can be called on partial_apply instructions,
insertAfterFullEvaluation does not name what the function does. One
could imagine a function which inserted after the applies of
(non-escaping) partial_applies.
Andy some time ago already created the new API but didn't go through and update
the old occurences. I did that in this PR and then deprecated the old API. The
tree is clean, so I could just remove it, but I decided to be nicer to
downstream people by deprecating it first.
