Introduce an `unsafe` expression akin to `try` and `await` that notes
that there are unsafe constructs in the expression to the right-hand
side. Extend the effects checker to also check for unsafety along with
throwing and async operations. This will result in diagnostics like
the following:
10 | func sum() -> Int {
11 | withUnsafeBufferPointer { buffer in
12 | let value = buffer[0]
| | `- note: reference to unsafe subscript 'subscript(_:)'
| |- warning: expression uses unsafe constructs but is not marked with 'unsafe'
| `- note: reference to parameter 'buffer' involves unsafe type 'UnsafeBufferPointer<Int>'
13 | tryWithP(X())
14 | return fastAdd(buffer.baseAddress, buffer.count)
These will come with a Fix-It that inserts `unsafe` into the proper
place. There's also a warning that appears when `unsafe` doesn't cover
any unsafe code, making it easier to clean up extraneous `unsafe`.
This approach requires that `@unsafe` be present on any declaration
that involves unsafe constructs within its signature. Outside of the
signature, the `unsafe` expression is used to identify unsafe code.
This allows us to load plugins into the sourcekitd service to handle requests (currently only used for code completion). This allows us to implement parts of sourcekitd in Swift and outside of the compiler repository, making it easier to iterated on them because the compiler doesn’t need to be rebuilt.
When Swift passes search paths to clang, it does so directly into the HeaderSearch. That means that those paths get ordered inconsistently compared to the equivalent clang flag, and causes inconsistencies when building clang modules with clang and with Swift. Instead of touching the HeaderSearch directly, pass Swift search paths as driver flags, just do them after the -Xcc ones.
Swift doesn't have a way to pass a search path to clang as -isystem, only as -I which usually isn't the right flag. Add an -Isystem Swift flag so that those paths can be passed to clang as -isystem.
rdar://93951328
Sema now type-checks the alternate ABI-providing decls inside of @abi attributes.
Making this work—particularly, making redeclaration checking work—required making name lookup aware of ABI decls. Name lookup now evaluates both API-providing and ABI-providing declarations. In most cases, it will filter ABI-only decls out unless a specific flag is passed, in which case it will filter API-only decls out instead. Calls that simply retrieve a list of declarations, like `IterableDeclContext::getMembers()` and friends, typically only return API-providing decls; you have to access the ABI-providing ones through those.
As part of that work, I have also added some basic compiler interfaces for working with the API-providing and ABI-providing variants. `ABIRole` encodes whether a declaration provides only API, only ABI, or both, and `ABIRoleInfo` combines that with a pointer to the counterpart providing the other role (for a declaration that provides both, that’ll just be a pointer to `this`).
Decl checking of behavior specific to @abi will come in a future commit.
Note that this probably doesn’t properly exercise some of the new code (ASTScope::lookupEnclosingABIAttributeScope(), for instance); I expect that to happen only once we can rename types using an @abi attribute, since that will create distinguishable behavior differences when resolving TypeReprs in other @abi attributes.
The new `DECL_ATTR_FEATURE_REQUIREMENT` macro in DeclAttr.def can be used to declare that an attribute should only be available when a related language feature is enabled.
Effects:
• `#if hasAttribute(someAttr)` will return `false` unless the required feature is enabled.
• Code completion will not include the attribute unless the required feature is enabled.
• `TypeChecker::checkDeclAttributes()` diagnoses non-implicit uses of the attribute.
Add this mechanism and use it to tie @abi to the ABIAttribute feature. Also design tests for it.
