Noticed this while preparing copy_value, destroy_value. The problem was that we
were not parsing the SIL Debug Location at the end of
mark_uninitialized_behavior.
This ireapplies commit 255c52de9f.
Original commit message:
Serialize debug scope and location info in the SIL assembler language.
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
At the moment it is only possible to test the effects that SIL
optimization passes have on debug information by observing the
effects of a full .swift -> LLVM IR compilation. This change enable us
to write targeted testcases for single SIL optimization passes.
The new syntax is as follows:
sil-scope-ref ::= 'scope' [0-9]+
sil-scope ::= 'sil_scope' [0-9]+ '{'
sil-loc
'parent' scope-parent
('inlined_at' sil-scope-ref )?
'}'
scope-parent ::= sil-function-name ':' sil-type
scope-parent ::= sil-scope-ref
sil-loc ::= 'loc' string-literal ':' [0-9]+ ':' [0-9]+
Each instruction may have a debug location and a SIL scope reference
at the end. Debug locations consist of a filename, a line number, and
a column number. If the debug location is omitted, it defaults to the
location in the SIL source file. SIL scopes describe the position
inside the lexical scope structure that the Swift expression a SIL
instruction was generated from had originally. SIL scopes also hold
inlining information.
<rdar://problem/22706994>
These are a result of sil-mode being originally based on Swift mode. These swift
statements never show up in SIL output (which does not show Swift bodies), so just remove it.
There's a buggy SIL verifier check that was previously tautological,
and it turns out that it's violated, apparently harmlessly. Since it
was already doing nothing, I've commented it out temporarily while
I figure out the right way to fix SILGen to get the invariant right.
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
memory layout and add a SelectInst API that allows for one to access select inst
operands when one does not care about what the cases actually are.
Previously select_enum, select_enum_addr had the following memory layout:
[operands], [cases]
In constrast, select_value had the following layout:
[operand1, case1, operand2, case 2, ...]
The layout for select_value makes it impossible to just visit operands in a
generic way via a higher level API. This is an important operation for many
analyses such as AA on select insts.
This commit does the following:
1. Adds a new abstract parent class for all select instructions called
SelectInst.
2. Adds a new templated implementation parent class that inherits from
SelectInst called SelectInstBase. This handles the complete implementation of
select for all types by templating on CaseTy.
3. Changes SelectEnumAddrInst, SelectEnumInst, SelectValueInst to be thin
classes that inherit from the appropriately specialized SelectInstBase.
I left in SelectEnumInstBase for now as a subclass of SelectInstBase and parent
class of SelectEnum{,Addr}Inst since it provides specific enum APIs that are
used all over the compiler. All of these methods have equivalent methods on
SelectInstBase. I just want to leave them for a later commit so that this commit
stays small.
Swift SVN r24159
