Introduce two modes of bridging:
* inline mode: this is basically how it worked so far. Using full C++ interop which allows bridging functions to be inlined.
* pure mode: bridging functions are not inlined but compiled in a cpp file. This allows to reduce the C++ interop requirements to a minimum. No std/llvm/swift headers are imported.
This change requires a major refactoring of bridging sources. The implementation of bridging functions go to two separate files: SILBridgingImpl.h and OptimizerBridgingImpl.h.
Depending on the mode, those files are either included in the corresponding header files (inline mode), or included in the c++ file (pure mode).
The mode can be selected with the BRIDGING_MODE cmake variable. By default it is set to the inline mode (= existing behavior). The pure mode is only selected in certain configurations to work around C++ interop issues:
* In debug builds, to workaround a problem with LLDB's `po` command (rdar://115770255).
* On windows to workaround a build problem.
* add `GlobalVariable.staticInitializerInstructions` to access all initializer instructions of a global
* implement `GlobalVariable.staticInitValue` with `GlobalVariable.staticInitializerInstructions`
* this requires that `InstructionList.reversed()` works without accessing the parent block of the iterator instruction
* allow `Context.erase(instruction:)` to delete instructions from a global's initializer list, which means to handle the case where a deleted instruction has no parent function.
* add new create-functions for instructions
* allow the Builder to build static initializer instructions for global variables
* some refactoring to simplify the implementation
Replace the generic `List` with the (non-generic) `InstructionList` and `BasicBlockList`.
The `InstructionList` is now a bit different than the `BasicBlockList` because it supports that instructions are deleted while iterating over the list.
Also add a test pass which tests instruction modification while iteration.
This fixes a dangling pointer issue when creating a `Swift.String` from `std::string`.
Also fixes a warning:
```
warning: variable 's' was never mutated; consider changing to 'let' constant
var s = SILBasicBlock_debugDescription(bridged)
~~~ ^
let
```
rdar://92963081
rdar://93053488
* split the PassUtils.swift file into PassContext.swift and Passes.swift
* rework `Builder` bridging allowing more insertion point variations, e.g. inserting at the end of a block.
* add Builder.create functions for more instructions
* add `PassContext.splitBlock`
* move SIL modification functions from PassContext to extensions of the relevant types (e.g. instructions).
* rename `Location.bridgedLocation` -> `Location.bridged`
and introduce the StringRef struct.
It's more efficient.
Also, rename the `HasName` protocol to `HasShortDescription`, which introduces the new requirement `shortDescription`. This is need because `name` now has `StringRef` type and not `String` anymore
For inserting new instruction after another instruction. This is especially interesting if the insertion point is a terminator.
In this case, the new instruction(s) are inserted in the successor block(s).
* add `BasicBlockSet`
* add `BasicBlockWorklist`
* add `BasicBlockRange`, which defines a range of blocks from a common dominating “begin” block to a set of “end” blocks.
* add `InstructionRange`, which is similar to `BasicBlockRange`, just on instruction level. It can be used for value lifetime analysis.
* rename `StackList` -> `Stack` and move it to `Optimizer/DataStructures`
* rename `PassContext.passContext` to `PassContext._bridged`
* add notify-functions to PassContext
Improve block/instruction lists and similar collections
* pretty print collections in the form “[a, b, c]”
* also do this for lazy sequences
* define a custom Mirror
* in a collection, only print the name of blocks, functions and globals (instead of the full object)
* replace `BasicBlock.reverseInstructions` with `BasicBlock.instructions.reversed()` - in an efficient way
