For years, optimizer engineers have been hitting a common bug caused by passes
assuming all SILValues have a parent function only to be surprised by SILUndef.
Generally we see SILUndef not that often so we see this come up later in
testing. This patch eliminates that problem by making SILUndef uniqued at the
function level instead of the module level. This ensures that it makes sense for
SILUndef to have a parent function, eliminating this possibility since we can
define an API to get its parent function.
rdar://123484595
This just creates a new SILUndef with the same type as the SILValue. This just
prevents one from having to write
SILUndef::get(value->getType(), *value->getModule()).
This removes the ambiguity when casting from a SingleValueInstruction to SILNode, which makes the code simpler. E.g. the "isRepresentativeSILNode" logic is not needed anymore.
Also, it reduces the size of the most used instruction class - SingleValueInstruction - by one pointer.
Conceptually, SILInstruction is still a SILNode. But implementation-wise SILNode is not a base class of SILInstruction anymore.
Only the two sub-classes of SILInstruction - SingleValueInstruction and NonSingleValueInstruction - inherit from SILNode. SingleValueInstruction's SILNode is embedded into a ValueBase and its relative offset in the class is the same as in NonSingleValueInstruction (see SILNodeOffsetChecker).
This makes it possible to cast from a SILInstruction to a SILNode without knowing which SILInstruction sub-class it is.
Casting to SILNode cannot be done implicitly, but only with an LLVM `cast` or with SILInstruction::asSILNode(). But this is a rare case anyway.
This removes the ambiguity when casting from a SingleValueInstruction to SILNode, which makes the code simpler. E.g. the "isRepresentativeSILNode" logic is not needed anymore.
Also, it reduces the size of the most used instruction class - SingleValueInstruction - by one pointer.
Conceptually, SILInstruction is still a SILNode. But implementation-wise SILNode is not a base class of SILInstruction anymore.
Only the two sub-classes of SILInstruction - SingleValueInstruction and NonSingleValueInstruction - inherit from SILNode. SingleValueInstruction's SILNode is embedded into a ValueBase and its relative offset in the class is the same as in NonSingleValueInstruction (see SILNodeOffsetChecker).
This makes it possible to cast from a SILInstruction to a SILNode without knowing which SILInstruction sub-class it is.
Casting to SILNode cannot be done implicitly, but only with an LLVM `cast` or with SILInstruction::asSILNode(). But this is a rare case anyway.
This makes it easier to understand conceptually why a ValueOwnershipKind with
Any ownership is invalid and also allowed me to explicitly document the lattice
that relates ownership constraints/value ownership kinds.
VS2015 had an issue with the deletion of an operator. Since VS2017 is
the minimum version that LLVM uses, we can assume that VS2017+ is in use
(_MSC_VER >= 1910). Clean up the now defunct workaround.
The ownership kind is Any for trivial types, or Owned otherwise, but
whether a type is trivial or not will soon depend on the resilience
expansion.
This means that a SILModule now uniques two SILUndefs per type instead
of one, and serialization uses two distinct sentinel IDs for this
purpose as well.
For now, the resilience expansion is not actually used here, so this
change is NFC, other than changing the module format.
This is in preparation for verifying that when ownership verification is enabled
that only enums and trivial values can have any ownership. I am doing this in
preparation for eliminating ValueOwnershipKind::Trivial.
rdar://46294760
We already assume in the given static method that the module is a non-null
pointer. So rather than us indirecting a ref to a pointer and then dereferencing
the pointer, we instead use the ref in the module implementation and dereference
the pointer.
rdar://46294760
introduce a common superclass, SILNode.
This is in preparation for allowing instructions to have multiple
results. It is also a somewhat more elegant representation for
instructions that have zero results. Instructions that are known
to have exactly one result inherit from a class, SingleValueInstruction,
that subclasses both ValueBase and SILInstruction. Some care must be
taken when working with SILNode pointers and testing for equality;
please see the comment on SILNode for more information.
A number of SIL passes needed to be updated in order to handle this
new distinction between SIL values and SIL instructions.
Note that the SIL parser is now stricter about not trying to assign
a result value from an instruction (like 'return' or 'strong_retain')
that does not produce any.
As there are no instructions left which produce multiple result values, this is a NFC regarding the generated SIL and generated code.
Although this commit is large, most changes are straightforward adoptions to the changes in the ValueBase and SILValue classes.
This is using LLVM's SSAUpdater utility.
I had to abstract it a little further because our 'phi' nodes are slightly
different. The SSAUpdater needs to iterate over phis in a basic block so I
abstracted this in a trait. Therefore, this commit needs a recent version of
puzzle/master which has this change applied.
Swift SVN r19634
