Regardless of consumes of copies, if the original lexical value is not
consumed on a dead-end path, it must remain live to that dead-end.
rdar://145226757
From talking with @dgregor, it became clear that this comment was easily
interpreted as saying that AssignFresh always introduced a disconnected value...
which is not the case. Instead, AssignFresh just introduces a new value that
could have any form of isolation. The actual isolation of the value is assigned
via tryToTrackValue and eventually SILIsolationInfo::get().
CSE uses OSSA rauw which creates copies and copies that are created to optimize
across borrow scopes are unoptimizable. This PR avoids this situation for now.
executing unknown code
This means we have to claw back some performance by recognizing harmless
releases.
Such as releases on types we known don't call a deinit with unknown
side-effects.
rdar://143497196
rdar://143141695
It's sufficient just to have a struct with a kind and a value. There
aren't any cases where the payload's original type benefits from being
statically preserved--they're only ever obtained as `SILValue`s. Keep
the type safety by way of constructors.
The reason why I am doing this is that in certain cases the AST captures indices
will never actually line up with partial apply capture indices since we seem to
"smush" together closures and locally defined functions.
NOTE: The reason for the really small amount of test changes is that this change
does not change the actual output by design. The only cases I had to change were
a case where we began to emit a better diagnostic and also where I added code
coverage around _ and let _ since those require ignored_use to be implemented so
that they would be diagnosed (previously we just did not emit anything so we
couldn't emit the diagnostic at the SIL level).
rdar://142661388
Don't use previously found owned concrete values in ossa. They will consumed by
forwarding operations like init_existential_ref. Instead create an unconditional cast
of the opened existential to concrete type and use that to create a concrete apply.
This is needed after running the SSAUpdater for an existing OSSA value, because the updater can
insert unnecessary phis in the middle of the original liverange which breaks up the original
liverange into smaller ones:
```
%1 = def_of_owned_value
%2 = begin_borrow %1
...
br bb2(%1)
bb2(%3 : @owned $T): // inserted by SSAUpdater
...
end_borrow %2 // use after end-of-lifetime!
destroy_value %3
```
It's not needed to run this utility if SSAUpdater is used to create a _new_ OSSA liverange.
In preparation for only recording the defs once, replace the
GraphNodeWorklist of defs with a SetVector. Preserve the current
visitation order by creating a worklist of indices to be visited.
Add a type which distinguishes among the types of defs that are pushed
onto the "def-use worklist". Note that it's not possible to rely on the
kind of value because the root may itself be a copy_value. For now, the
distinction is discarded as soon as the def is visited.
In terms of the test suite the only difference is that we allow for non-Sendable
types to be returned from nonisolated functions. This is safe due to the rules
of rbi. We do still error when we return non-Sendable functions across isolation
boundaries though.
The reason that I am doing this now is that I am implementing a prototype that
allows for nonisolated functions to inherit isolation from their caller. This
would have required me to implement support both in Sema for results and
arguments in SIL. Rather than implement results in Sema, I just finished the
work of transitioning the result checking out of Sema and into SIL. The actual
prototype will land in a subsequent change.
rdar://127477211
I am doing this since I discovered that we are not printing certain errors as
early as we used to (due to the refactoring I did here), which makes it harder
to see the errors that we are emitting while processing individual instructions
and before we run the actual dataflow.
A nice side-effect of this is that it will make it easy to dump the error in the
debugger rather than having to wait until the point in the code where the normal
logging takes place.
This makes it so that one does not need to deal with the differences in text in
between the task isolated case and the actor isolated case. This is done by
swallowing the entire part of this message in one method rather than having the
caller do the work.
This is going to let me just pass through the error struct to the diagnostic
rather than having the CRTP and then constructing an info object per CRTP.
Currently, to make it easier to refactor, I changed the code in
TransferNonSendable to just take in the new error and call the current CRTP
routines. In the next commit, I am going to refactor TransferNonSendable.cpp
itself. This just makes it easier to test that I did not break anything.
In Embedded Swift, witness method lookup is done from specialized witness tables.
For this to work, the type of witness_method must be specialized as well.
Otherwise the method call would be done with wrong parameter conventions (indirect instead of direct).
MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations already did most of the vtable specialization work.
So it makes sense to remove the VTableSpecializerPass completely and do everything in MandatoryPerformanceOptimizations.
The reason why is that we want to distinguish inbetween SILFunction's that are
marked as unspecified by SILGen and those that are parsed from textual SIL that
do not have any specified isolation. This will make it easier to write nice
FileCheck tests against SILGen output on what is the inferred isolation for
various items.
NFCI.
