This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
Andy some time ago already created the new API but didn't go through and update
the old occurences. I did that in this PR and then deprecated the old API. The
tree is clean, so I could just remove it, but I decided to be nicer to
downstream people by deprecating it first.
We have for a long time talked about creating a scope like data structure for
use in the SILOptimizer. The discussion was whether or not to reuse the
infrastructure in SILGen that does this already. There were concerns about doing
so since the code in the SILOptimizer and SILGen can work differently.
With that in mind, I added a small AssertingScope class and built on top of that
a composition SIL level class called SILOptScope that one can use to add various
cleanups. One is able to both destructively pop at end of scope and pop along
early exits.
At an implementation level, I kept it simple and:
1. Represented a scope as a stack of Optional<Cleanup> which are just a wrapper
around a std::function. The Optional is so that we can invalidate a cleanup.
2. Based all of these scopes around the idea that the user of the scope must
invalidate the scope by hand. If not, the scope object will assert at the end
of its RAII scope.
3. Rather than creating a whole class hierarchy, I just used std::function
closures to keep things simple.
