Currently, this is staged in as `_forget`,
as part of SE-390. It can only be used on
`self` for a move-only type within a consuming
method or accessor. There are other rules, see
Sema for the details.
A `forget self` really just consumes self and
performs memberwise destruction of its data.
Thus, the current expansion of this statement
just reuses what we inject into the end of a
deinit.
Parsing of `forget` is "contextual".
By contextual I mean that we do lookahead to
the next token and see if it's identifier-like.
If so, then we parse it as the `forget` statement.
Otherwise, we parse it as though "forget" is an
identifier as part of some expression.
This way, we won't introduce a source break for
people who wrote code that calls a forget
function.
This should make it seamless to change it from
`_forget` to `forget` in the future.
resolves rdar://105795731
rdar://105837040
* WIP: Store layout string in type metadata
* WIP: More cases working
* WIP: Layout strings almost working
* Add layout string pointer to struct metadata
* Fetch bytecode layout strings from metadata in runtime
* More efficient bytecode layout
* Add support for interpreted generics in layout strings
* Layout string instantiation, take and more
* Remove duplicate information from layout strings
* Include size of previous object in next objects offset to reduce number of increments at runtime
* Add support for existentials
* Build type layout strings with StructBuilder to support target sizes and metadata pointers
* Add support for resilient types
* Properly cache layout strings in compiler
* Generic resilient types working
* Non-generic resilient types working
* Instantiate resilient type in layout when possible
* Fix a few issues around alignment and signing
* Disable generics, fix static alignment
* Fix MultiPayloadEnum size when no extra tag is necessary
* Fixes after rebase
* Cleanup
* Fix most tests
* Fix objcImplementattion and non-Darwin builds
* Fix BytecodeLayouts on non-Darwin
* Fix Linux build
* Fix sizes in linux tests
* Sign layout string pointers
* Use nullptr instead of debug value
This will be enabled by default in Swift 6, but can now also be enabled by passing `-enable-upcoming-feature DisableActorInferenceFromPropertyWrapperUsage` to the compiler.
- Remove the `Rewritten` field and `setRewritten()`. Make `getRewritten()` invoke the request.
- Rename fields `Macro` and `MacroLoc` to `MacroName` and `MacroNameLoc` respectively as well as their getters to match those in `MacroExpansionExpr`.
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
Diagnose situations where a sub-class or a protocol do not have all
of the reflection metadata attributes required by a superclass.
Resolves: rdar://103990788
This ensures that when we're printing multiple module interfaces, we separate out
the namespaces and their members correctly between the produced module interfaces.
- SILPackType carries whether the elements are stored directly
in the pack, which we're not currently using in the lowering,
but it's probably something we'll want in the final ABI.
Having this also makes it clear that we're doing the right
thing with substitution and element lowering. I also toyed
with making this a scalar type, which made it necessary in
various places, although eventually I pulled back to the
design where we always use packs as addresses.
- Pack boundaries are a core ABI concept, so the lowering has
to wrap parameter pack expansions up as packs. There are huge
unimplemented holes here where the abstraction pattern will
need to tell us how many elements to gather into the pack,
but a naive approach is good enough to get things off the
ground.
- Pack conventions are related to the existing parameter and
result conventions, but they're different on enough grounds
that they deserve to be separated.
A lot of existing regression tests rely on there
being some form of move-only classes, despite
them being something that will not be available
to users (and not complete).
This change introduces a `MoveOnlyClasses`
experimental feature so that those tests don't
need to be fully rewritten just yet. You need to
include `-enable-experimental-feature MoveOnlyClasses` along with
`-enable-experimental-move-only` to get move-only classes.
